Skip to main content
Log in

Robust inventory control under demand and lead time uncertainty

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper a general methodology is proposed based on robust optimization for an inventory control problem subject to uncertain demands and uncertain lead times. Several lead time uncertainty sets are proposed based on the budget uncertainty set, and a set based on the central limit theorem. Robust optimization models are developed for a periodic review, finite horizon inventory control problem subject to uncertain demands and uncertain lead times. We develop an approach based on Benders’ decomposition to compute optimal robust (i.e., best worst-case) policy parameters. The proposed approach does not assume distributional knowledge, makes no assumption regarding order crossovers, and is tractable in a practical sense. Comparing the new approach to an epigraph reformulation method, we demonstrate that the epigraph reformulation approach is overly conservative even when costs are stationary. The approach is benchmarked against the sample average approximation (SAA) method. Computational results indicate that the approach provides more stable and robust solutions compared to SAA in terms of standard deviation and worst-case solution, especially when the realized distribution is different than the sampled distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvarez, P. P., & Vera, J. R. (2011). Application of robust optimization to the sawmill planning problem. Annals of Operations Research, 219, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang, M., Lim, Y. F., & Sim, M. (2012). Robust storage assignment in unit-load warehouses. Management Science, 58(11), 2114–2130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aouam, T., & Brahimi, N. (2013). Integrated production planning and order acceptance under uncertainty: A robust optimization approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(3), 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandi, C., & Berstimas, D. (2012). Tractable stochastic analysis in high dimensions via robust optimization. Mathematical Programming, 134(1), 23–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A., & Ben-Tal, A. (2009). Duality in robust optimization: Primal worst equals dual best. Operations Research Letters, 37(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., & Nemirovski, A. (2009). Robust optimization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal, A., Golany, B., Nemirovski, A., & Vial, J. (2005). Retailer-supplier flexible commitments contracts: A robust optimization approach. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 7(3), 248–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal, A., Goryashko, A., Guslitzer, E., & Nemirovski, A. (2004). Adjustable robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Mathematical Programming, 99(2), 351–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (1999). Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Operations Research Letters, 25(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas, D., & Thiele, A. (2006). A robust optimization approach to inventory theory. Operations Research, 54(1), 150–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienstock, D., & Ozbay, N. (2008). Computing robust basestock levels. Discrete Optimization, 5(2), 389–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohle, C., Maturana, S., & Vera, J. (2010). A robust optimization approach to wine grape harvesting scheduling. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, D., Flisberg, P., & Rönnqvist, M. (2014). Using robust optimization for distribution and inventory planning for a large pulp producer. Computers & Operations Research, 44, 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A., & Scarf, H. (1960). Optimal policies for a multi-echelon inventory problem. Management Science, 6(4), 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, B. T., Miller, A. J., Balasubramanian, H. J., & Huschka, T. R. (2010). Optimal allocation of surgery blocks to operating rooms under uncertainty. Operations Research, 58(4), 802–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrel, V., Murat, C., & Thiele, A. (2014). Recent advances in robust optimization: An overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(3), 471–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorissen, B. L., & Den Hertog, D. (2013). Robust counterparts of inequalities containing sums of maxima of linear functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 227(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayya, J., Bagchi, U., Kim, J., & Sun, D. (2008). On static stochastic order crossover. International Journal of Production Economics, 114, 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X., Xu, S., & Ord, J. (1998). An inventory model with order crossover. Operations Research, 46(3), S112–S119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • José Alem, D., & Morabito, R. (2012). Production planning in furniture settings via robust optimization. Computers & Operations Research, 39(2), 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minoux, M. (2009). Robust linear programming with right-hand-side uncertainty, duality, and applications. In L. Floudas & P. Pardolas (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Optimization (2nd ed.). Boston, US: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minoux, M. (2011). On two-stage robust LP with RHS uncertainty: Complexity results and applications. Journal of Global Optimization, 49(3), 521–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Movahed, K. K., & Zhang, Z. H. (2015). Robust design of (s, S) inventory policy parameters in supply chains with demand and lead time uncertainties. International Journal of Systems Science, 46(12), 2258–2268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., & Zenios, S. A. (1995). Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Operations Research, 43(2), 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riezebos, J. (2006). Inventory order crossovers. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(2), 666–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rikun, A. (2011). Applications of robust optimization to queueing and inventory systems. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  • Soyster, A. (1973). Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Operations Research, 21(5), 1154–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soyster, A., & Murphy, F. (2013). A unifying framework for duality and modeling in robust linear programs. Omega, 41(6), 984–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varas, M., Maturana, S., Pascual, R., Vargas, I., & Vera, J. (2014). Scheduling production for a sawmill: A robust optimization approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 150, 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C., Li, Y., & Cai, X. (2011). Robust optimal policies of production and inventory with uncertain returns and demand. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(2), 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M. (2011). Two-stage minimax regret robust uncapacitated lot-sizing problems with demand uncertainty. Operations Research Letters, 39(5), 342–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipkin, P. (2000). Foundations of Inventory Management. New York City: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Thorsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thorsen, A., Yao, T. Robust inventory control under demand and lead time uncertainty. Ann Oper Res 257, 207–236 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2084-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2084-1

Keywords

Navigation