Skip to main content
Log in

Early slip detection with a tactile sensor based on retina

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The interest in tactile sensors is increasing as their use in complex unstructured environments is demanded, like in telepresence, minimal invasive surgery, robotics etc. The array of pressure data provided by these devices can be treated with different image processing algorithms to extract miscellaneous information. However, as in the case of vision chips or artificial retinas, problems arise when the size of the array and the computational complexity increase. Having a look at the skin, the information collected by every mechanoreceptor is not sent to the brain for its processing, but some complex pre-processing is performed to fit the limited throughput of the nervous system. This is specially important for high bandwidth demanding tasks, as the case of slip detection with tactile sensors, which is demanding in computing requirements. Here we show some results from a tactile processor based on circuitry proposed for an artificial retina that has been modified to mimic the way the biological skin works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Tactile elements

  2. Ideally, it can be assumed that the scale factors are the same. However, to take into account signal-dependent non-idealities, these scale factors should be considered only similar.

References

  1. Lee, M. H., & Nicholls, H. R. (1999). Tactile sensing for mechatronics-a state of the art survey. Mechatronics, 9, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee, M. H. (2000). Tactile sensing, new directions, new challenges. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 19(7), 636–643.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Iwashita, A., & Shimojo, M. (2004). Development of a mixed signal LSI for tactile data processing. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 5, 4408–4413.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Canepa, G., Petrigliano, R., Campanella, M., & De Rossi, D. (1998). Detection of incipient object slippage by skin-like sensing and neural network processing. IEEE Transactions on Systems and Cybernetics, 28(3), 348–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Howe, R. D. (1994). Tactile sensing and control of robotic manipulation. Journal of Advanced Robotics, 8, 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujimoto, I., Yamada, Y., Morizono, T., Umetani, Y., & Maeno, T. (2003). Development of artificial finger skin to detect incipient slip for realization of static friction sensation, Proceedings of IEEE Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems, 15–21.

  7. Stansfield, S. A. (1993). Experiments in robotic sensorimotor control during grasp. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23, 891–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Howe, R. D., & Cutkosky, M. R. (1989). Sensing skin acceleration for slip and texture perception. Proceedings of IEEE Robotics Automation, 145–150.

  9. Mead, C. (1989). Analog VLSI and neural systems, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.

  10. Peine, W. J., & Howe, R. D. (1998). Do humans sense finger deformation or distributed pressure to detect lumps in soft tissue? Proeedings of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, 64, 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holweg, E. G. M., Hoeve, H., Jongkind, W., Marconi, L., Melchiorri, C., & Bonivento, C. (1996). Slip detection by tactile sensors: Algorithms and experimental results. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

  12. Alessio, T. D. (1999). Measurement errors in the scanning of piezoresistive sensors arrays. Sensors and Actuators, 72, 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Silva-Martínez, J., & Solís-Bustos, S. (1999). Design considerations for high performance very ow frequency filters. Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, ISCAS’99, 2, 648–651.

  14. Veeravalli, A., Sánchez-Sinencio E., & Silva-Martínez, J. (2002). Transconductance amplifier structures with very small transconductances: A comparative design approach. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 37, 770–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodríguez-Vázquez, A., Delgado-Restituto, M., & Domínguez-Castro, R. (1999). Comparators: Architectures for voltage and current input with CMOS implementation examples. Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 3, 557–600.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by project TIC2003-09817-C02, and has been motivated from maintained research collaboration between Seville and Málaga.

The authors thank ZOFLEX® for providing samples of pressure-activated conductive rubber sheets.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rocío Maldonado-López.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maldonado-López, R., Vidal-Verdú, F., Liñán, G. et al. Early slip detection with a tactile sensor based on retina. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 53, 97–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-007-9059-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-007-9059-3

Keywords

Navigation