Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Moderated Mediation of Perceived Intoxication and Sexual Arousal on Determinants of Sexual Risk Behavior in Men Who Have Sex with Men

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Behavioral interventions remain the preferred strategy for reducing HIV-related risk behavior among men who have sex with men (MSM), one of the populations most affected by HIV. To improve intervention efforts, research is needed to identify cognitive-motivational factors that may play a role in sexual risk behaviors among MSM. This study sought to replicate and extend previous work from a heterosexual population that identified a serial mediation effect of perceived intoxication and subjective sexual arousal in the relationship between alcohol consumption and determinants of sexual risk in a population of MSM. Exploratory moderated mediation analyses tested subjective sexual arousal as a moderator of the indirect effect of alcohol consumption on determinants of sexual risk via perceived intoxication. Participants (N = 117 MSM, ages 21–50) were randomly assigned to one of six experimental conditions based on two manipulations: beverage condition (alcohol, placebo, or control) and sexual arousal (low or high). Dependent measures were likelihood to engage in risky sex and condom negotiation skills. Results did not support the serial mediation effect but showed some support for the moderated mediation model in the prediction of behavioral skills. Implications for alcohol and arousal myopia theories of risky behavior and HIV prevention efforts are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Johnson AS, Hall HI, Hu X, Lansky A, Holtgrave DR, Mermin J. Trends in diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States, 2002-2011. J Am Med Assoc. 2014;312(4):432–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson WD, Diaz RM, Flanders WD, Goodman M, Hill AN, Holtgrave D et al. Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001230.pub2.

  3. Kalichman SC, Weinhardt L. Negative affect and sexual risk behavior: comment on Crepaz and Marks (2001). Health Psychol. 2001;20(4):300–1. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Patterson DA, Wolf S, Hall M, Golder S. Beliefs and behaviors regarding substance use and HIV risk among men who have sex with men (MSM) in a mid-sized U.S. community. J HIV AIDS Soc Serv. 2009;8(2):188–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15381500903025605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baliunas D, Rehm J, Irving H, Shuper P. Alcohol consumption and risk of incident human immunodeficiency virus infection: a meta-analysis. Int J Public Health. 2010;55(3):159–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-0095-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shuper PA, Joharchi N, Irving H, Rehm J. Alcohol as a correlate of unprotected sexual behavior among people living with HIV/AIDS: review and meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(6):1021–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9589-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper ML. Toward a person × situation model of sexual risk-taking behaviors: Illuminating the conditional effects of traits across sexual situations and relationship contexts. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;98(2):319–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017785.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weinhardt LS, Carey MP. Does alcohol lead to sexual risk behavior? Findings from event-level research. Annu Rev Sex Res. 2000;11:125–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Berry MS, Johnson MW. Does being drunk or high cause HIV sexual risk behavior? A systematic review of drug administration studies. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2017.08.009.

  10. Rehm J, Shield KD, Joharchi N, Shuper PA. Alcohol consumption and the intention to engage in unprotected sex: Systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Addiction. 2012;107(1):51–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03621.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maisto SA, Palfai T, Vanable PA, Heath J, Woolf-King SE. The effects of alcohol and sexual arousal on determinants of sexual risk in men who have sex with men. Arch Sex Behav. 2012;41(4):971–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-011-9846-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loewenstein G. Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1996;65(3):272–92. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loewenstein G, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(2):267–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blanton H, Gerrard M. Effect of sexual motivation on men’s risk perception for sexually transmitted disease: there must be 50 ways to justify a lover. Health Psychol. 1997;16(4):374–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.16.4.374.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ariely D, Loewenstein G. The heat of the moment: the effect of sexual arousal on sexual decision making. J Behav Decis Mak. 2006;19(2):87–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wray TB, Simons JS, Maisto SA. Effects of alcohol intoxication and autonomic arousal on delay discounting and risky sex in young adult heterosexual men. Addict Behav. 2015;42:9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Steele CM, Josephs RA. Alcohol myopia: Its prized and dangerous effects. Am Psychol. 1990;45(8):921–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.8.921.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ebel-Lam AP, MacDonald TK, Zanna MP, Fong GT. An experimental investigation of the interactive effects of alcohol and sexual arousal on intentions to have unprotected sex. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2009;31(3):226–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530903058383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. MacDonald TK, MacDonald G, Zanna MP, Fong G. Alcohol, sexual arousal, and intentions to use condoms in young men: applying alcohol myopia theory to risky sexual behavior. Health Psychol. 2000;19(3):290–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. George WH, Davis KC, Norris J, Heiman JR, Stoner SA, Schacht RL, et al. Indirect effects of acute alcohol intoxication on sexual risk-taking: the roles of subjective and physiological sexual arousal. Arch Sex Behav. 2009;38(4):498–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9346-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prause N, Staley C, Finn P. The effects of acute ethanol consumption on sexual response and sexual risk-taking intent. Arch Sex Behav. 2011;40(2):373–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis KC, Hendershot CS, George WH, Norris J, Heiman JR. Alcohol’s effects on sexual decision making: an integration of alcohol myopia and individual differences. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(6):843–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Engle KB, Williams TK. Effect of an ounce of vodka on alcoholics’ desire for alcohol. Q J Stud Alcohol. 1972;33(4-A):1099-105.

  24. Marlatt GA, Demming B, Reid JB. Loss of control drinking in alcoholics: an experimental analogue. J Abnorm Psychol. 1973;81(3):233–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034532.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson GT, Lawson DM. Expectancies, alcohol, and sexual arousal in male social drinkers. J Abnorm Psychol. 1976;85(6):587–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.85.6.587.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson GT, Lawson DM. Expectancies, alcohol, and sexual arousal in women. J Abnorm Psychol. 1978;87(3):358–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.87.8.358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Maisto SA, Carey MP, Carey KB, Gordon CM. The effects of alcohol and expectancies on risk perception and behavioral skills relevant to safer sex among heterosexual young adult women. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63(4):476–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maisto SA, Carey MP, Carey KB, Gordon CM, Schum JL. Effects of alcohol and expectancies on HIV-related risk perception and behavioral skills in heterosexual women. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004;12(4):288–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.12.4.288.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Davis KC, George WH, Norris J, Schacht RL, Stoner SA, Hendershot CS, et al. Effects of alcohol and blood alcohol concentration limb on sexual risk-taking intentions. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009;70(4):499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peplau LA. Human sexuality: how do men and women differ? Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2003;12(2):37–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chivers ML, Seto MC, Blanchard R. Gender and sexual orientation differences in sexual response to sexual activities versus gender of actors in sexual films. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;93(6):1108–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rupp HA, Wallen K. Sex differences in response to visual sexual stimuli: a review. Arch Sex Behav. 2008;37(2):206–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rieger G, Savin-Williams RC. The eyes have it: sex and sexual orientation differences in pupil dilation patterns. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(8):e40256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Neave N, Menaged M, Weightman DR. Sex differences in cognition: the role of testosterone and sexual orientation. Brain Cognit. 1999;41(3):245–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rahman Q, Wilson GD. Large sexual-orientation-related differences in performance on mental rotation and judgement of line orientation tasks. Neuropsychology. 2003;17(1):25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rahman Q, Abrahams S, Wilson GD. Sexual-orientation-related differences in verbal fluency. Neuropsychology. 2003;17(2):240–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Collaer ML, Hines M. Human behavioral sex differences: a role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychol Bull. 1995;118(1):55–107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Caplan PJ, Caplan JB. Thinking critically about research on sex and gender. New York: HarperCollins College Publishers; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rahman Q, Wilson GD, Abrahams S. Biosocial factors, sexual orientation and neurocognitive functioning. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29(7):867–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Maisto SA, Simons JS. Research on the effects of alcohol and sexual arousal on sexual risk in men who have sex with men: Implications for HIV prevention interventions. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(1):158–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1220-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Edwards JR, Lambert LS. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods. 2007;12(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cahalan D, Cissin I, Crossley H. American drinking practices. New Brunswick: Rutgers Center for Alcohol Studies; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Woolf-King SE, Maisto S, Carey M, Vanable P. Selection of film clips and development of a video for the investigation of sexual decision making among men who have sex with men. J Sex Res. 2010;47(6):589–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490903216748.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Abbey A, Saenz C, Buck PO. The cumulative effects of acute alcohol consumption, individual differences and situational perceptions on sexual decision making. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66(1):82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behav Res. 2007;42(1):185–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hayes AF. An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Aiken LS, West SG, Reno RR. Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sher KJ, Walitzer KS. Individual differences in the stress-response-dampening effect of alcohol: a dose-response study. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986;95(2):159–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.95.2.159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Moberg CA, Curtin JJ. Alcohol selectively reduces anxiety but not fear: startle response during unpredictable versus predictable threat. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118(2):335–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015636.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Dermen KH, Cooper ML. Sex-related alcohol expectancies among adolescents: I. Scale development. Psychol Addict Behav. 1994;8(3):152–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.8.3.152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Cooper ML, O’Hara RE, Martins J. Does drinking improve the quality of sexual experience?: Sex-specific alcohol expectancies and subjective experience on drinking versus sober sexual occasions. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(Suppl 1):40–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1136-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Gilmore AK, George WH, Nguyen HV, Heiman JR, Davis KC, Norris J. Influences of situational factors and alcohol expectancies on sexual desire and arousal among heavy-episodic drinking women: acute alcohol intoxication and condom availability. Arch Sex Behav. 2013;42(6):949–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0109-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. George WH, Stoner SA, Norris J, Lopez PA, Lehman GL. Alcohol expectancies and sexuality: a self-fulfilling prophecy analysis of dyadic perceptions and behavior. J Stud Alcohol. 2000;61(1):168–76. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2000.61.168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Alexander MG, Fisher TD. Truth and consequences: using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self-reported sexuality. J Sex Res. 2003;40(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fisher TD. Sex of experimenter and social norm effects on reports of sexual behavior in young men and women. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36(1):89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9094-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cooper ML. Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: evaluating the evidence. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;supplement, (14):101–17.

  61. Hughes KYR, Anderson VN. What turns women on? Black and White women’s sexual arousal. Int J Sex Health. 2007;19(2):17–31. https://doi.org/10.1300/J514v19n02_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA14480 and 2K05 AA16928).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine A. Buckheit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buckheit, K.A., Mitzel, L.D., Maisto, S.A. et al. Moderated Mediation of Perceived Intoxication and Sexual Arousal on Determinants of Sexual Risk Behavior in Men Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav 23, 1460–1470 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2343-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2343-7

Keywords

Navigation