Abstract
Exotic dancers have received little research attention despite evidence of high-risk behaviours within exotic dance clubs (EDCs). We developed and assessed the reliability and validity of a risk environment score, examining differences between dancers (n = 107) and other staff (n = 172). In the summer of 2013, anonymous surveys were administered via A-CASI in EDCs (N = 26) in Baltimore among exotic dancers and staff. Surveys consisted of a brief demographic section followed by 65 statements. The overall domain had an alpha = 0.77 and subdomains had the following: social (alpha = 0.87), economic (alpha = 0.92), drug (alpha = 0.89), and policy (alpha = 0.66). In a factor analysis, each domain contributed significantly to the overall latent construct. The results indicate a high level of HIV/STI risk for dancers in EDCs and underscore the need for targeted interventions in these environments. As we continue to unpack the function of the broader environment in STI/HIV risk transmission, the scale could be instructive for other settings.
Resumen
Existen pocos estudios sobre las bailarinas exóticas a pesar de la evidencia de que tienen comportamientos de alto riesgo dentro de clubes de danza exótica. Desarrollamos una puntuación de riesgo del entorno y evaluamos su validez y confiabilidad al examinar las diferencias entre bailarinas (n = 107) y otro personal (n = 172). En el verano de 2013, bailarinas y otro personal completaron una encuesta anónima en clubes de danza exótica (N = 26) en Baltimore usando la tecnología ACASI. La encuesta constó de una breve sección demográfica y de 65 declaraciones. Calculamos el coeficiente alfa para el dominio global (alfa = 0.77) y para los siguientes subdominios: social (alfa = 0.87), económico (alfa = 0.92), droga (alfa = 0.89) y política (alfa = 0.66). En un análisis factorial, cada dominio contribuyó significativamente al constructo latente global. Los resultados indican que hay un alto nivel de riesgo de VIH/ITS para las bailarinas en clubes de danza exótica y recalcan la necesidad de intervenciones formuladas específicamente para estos lugares. Esta escala podría ser útil para otros lugares a medida que continuemos a determinar la función del entorno más amplio en el riesgo de la transmisión de VIH/ITS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blankenship KM, Koester S. Criminal law, policing policy, and HIV risk in female street sex workers and injection drug users. J Law Med Ethics. 2002;30(4):548–9.
Burris S, Blankenship KM, Donoghoe M, Sherman S, Vernick JS, Case P, et al. Addressing the “risk environment” for injection drug users: the mysterious case of the missing cop. Milbank Q. 2004;82(1):125–56.
Blankenship KM, Friedman SR, Dworkin S, Mantell JE. Structural interventions: concepts, challenges and opportunities for research. J Urban Health. 2006;83(1):59–72.
Rhodes T, Singer M, Bourgois P, Friedman SR, Strathdee SA. The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(5):1026–44.
Rhodes T. The ‘risk environment’: a framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. Int J Drug Policy. 2002;13(2):85–94.
Rhodes T. Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach. Int J Drug Policy. 2009;20(3):193–201.
Blankenship KM, Burris S, West B, Irwin K, Niccolai L, Kershaw T, et al. Policing and commercial sex work in India. AIDS Science Day. New Haven, CT: Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS; 2007.
Goldenberg SM, Strathdee SA, Gallardo M, Rhodes T, Wagner KD, Patterson TL. Over here, it’s just drugs, women and all the madness: the HIV risk environment of clients of female sex workers in Tijuana, Mexico. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(7):1185–92.
Urada LA, Morisky DE, Hernandez LI, Strathdee SA. Social and structural factors associated with consistent condom use among female entertainment workers trading sex in the Philippines. AIDS Behav. 2012;17(2):523–535.
Deering KN, Rusch M, Amram O, Chettiar J, Nguyen P, Feng CX, et al. Piloting a ‘spatial isolation’ index: the built environment and sexual and drug use risks to sex workers. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25(3):533–42.
Shannon K, Strathdee SA, Shoveller J, Rusch M, Kerr T, Tyndall MW. Structural and environmental barriers to condom use negotiation with clients among female sex workers: implications for HIV-prevention strategies and policy. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(4):659–65.
Shannon K, Goldenberg SM, Deering KN, Strathdee SA. HIV infection among female sex workers in concentrated and high prevalence epidemics: why a structural determinants framework is needed. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014;9(2):174–82.
Sherman SG, Lilleston P, Reuben J. More than a dance: The production of sexual health risk in the exotic dance clubs in Baltimore, USA. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(3):475–81.
Reuben J, Serio-Chapman C, Welsh C, Matens R, Sherman S. Correlates of current transactional sex among a sample of female exotic dancers in Baltimore, MD. J Urban Health. 2010;88(2):342–51.
Sherman SG, Reuben J, Chapman CS, Lilleston P. Risks associated with crack cocaine smoking among exotic dancers in Baltimore, MD. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011;114(2–3):249–52.
Lilleston PS, Reuben J, Sherman SG. This is our sanctuary: perceptions of safety among exotic dancers in Baltimore, Maryland. Health Place. 2012;18(3):561–7.
Lilleston PS, Reuben J, Sherman SG. Exotic dance in Baltimore: from entry to STI/HIV risk. Women and Health. 2015;55(5):595–611.
Maticka-Tyndale E, Lewis J, Clark JP, Zubick J, Young S. Exotic dancing and health. Women Health. 2000;31(1):87–108.
Frank K. G-strings and sympathy: strip club regulars and male desire. Durham: Duke University Press; 2002.
Spencer A. The erotic economy. Unpublished manuscript Available from http://www.woodhullfoundation.org. 2005.
Vanwesenbeeck I. Another decade of social scientific work on sex work: a review of research 1990–2000. Ann Rev Sex Res. 2001;12:242–89.
Cureton EE. Validity, reliability and baloney. Educ Psychol Meas. 1950;10(1):94–96.
Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993.
Hoyle RH. Handbook of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indixes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria vs. new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999;6:1–55.
Yu C-Y. Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles; 2002.
Bentler PM. On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personal Individ Differ. 2007;42(5):825–9.
Hoyle RH, Duvall JL. Determining the number of factors in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2004. pp. 301–315.
Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods. 2000;3(1):4–70.
Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol. 1995;50(9):741–9.
Kenny DA, Kaniskan B, McCoach DB. The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociol Methods Res. 2015;44(3):486–507.
Gerbing DW, Anderson JC. Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Sage Focus Editions. 1993;154:40.
Lilleston PS, Reuben J, Sherman SG. Safety and transactional sex work on the block. Health Place. 2011;18(3):561–7.
Dworkin SL, Blankenship K. Microfinance and HIV/AIDS prevention: assessing its promise and limitations. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(3):462–9.
Kim JC, Watts CH, Hargreaves JR, Ndhlovu LX, Phetla G, Morison LA, et al. Understanding the impact of a microfinance-based intervention on women’s empowerment and the reduction of intimate partner violence in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1794–802.
Manopaiboon C, Bunnell RE, Kilmarx PH, Chaikummao S, Limpakarnjanarat K, Supawitkul S, et al. Leaving sex work: barriers, facilitating factors and consequences for female sex workers in northern Thailand. AIDS Care. 2003;15(1):39–52.
Minh TT, Nhan DT, West GR, Durant TM, Jenkins RA, Huong PT, et al. Sex workers in Vietnam: how many, how risky? AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16(5):389–404.
Maticka-Tyndale E, Lewis J, Clark JP, Zubick J, Young S. Social and cultural vulnerability to sexually transmitted infection: the work of exotic dancers. Can J Public Health. 1999;90(1):19–22.
Hayduk L, Cummings G, Boadu K, Pazderka-Robinson H, Boulianne S. Testing! testing! one, two, three–testing the theory in structural equation models! Personal Individ Differ. 2007;42(5):841–50.
Grossman M, NIAAA research monograph No 25 NPN, 1993, pp. 91–123. The economic analysis of addictive behavior. In: Hilton ME, Bloss G, editors. Economics and the prevention of alcohol related problems. 25. Bethesda: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; 1993. pp. 91–123.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (5R21DA033855-02; T-32DA007292) and the Johns Hopkins University Center for AIDS Research (1P30AI094189). M.R. Brantley was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (T32 AI050056-12) and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31 DA038540).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sherman, S.G., Brantley, M.R., Zelaya, C. et al. The Development of an HIV Risk Environment Scale of Exotic Dance Clubs. AIDS Behav 21, 2147–2155 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1749-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1749-y