Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Role of income diversification in protecting natural forests: evidence from rural households in forest margins of Sri Lanka

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Income diversification among households living in forest margins helps to maintain a sustainable livelihood. Reducing forest dependency helps in-situ conservation of biodiversity thereby conserving forest resources. This paper presents evidence of income diversification and its effects on forest resource extraction by rural communities living in forest margins. Diversified income sources of typical households include crop farming, off-farm employment, animal husbandry, home gardening and extraction of non-timber forest products and fuelwood. The calculated mean indexes of diversification for the households in forest margins under investigation were 2.53, 2.57, 2.19 and 2.25. Results of the analysis show that the income diversification index had a negative and significant effect on dependency of rural households on forest resource extraction for three forest reserves. A positive relation between the index of income diversification and total income indicates an increase in household income due to increasing diversification income sources. However, given the complex nature of protecting natural forests, income diversification should be part of a broader integrated policy goal to protect natural forests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADB (1997) Report and recommendation for upper watershed development project in Sri Lanka. RRP:SRI 28162, August, 1997, Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines

  • Angelsen A, Wunder S (2003) Exploring the forest-poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications. Center for International Forest Research (CIFOR) occasional paper # 40. Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Barghouti S, Kane S, Sorby K, Ali M (2004) Agricultural diversification for the poor. Guidelines for practitioners. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper 1, World Bank, Washington D.C

  • Bluffstone R, Boscolo M, Molina R (2001) How does community forestry affect rural households? A labor allocation model of the Bolivian Andes. Working paper, University of Redlands, USA

  • Byron N, Arnold M (1999) What futures for the people in tropical forests? World Dev 27(5):789–805. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00025-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish W (2000) Empirical regularities in the poverty environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe. World Dev 28(11):1979–2003. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00066-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caviglia-Harris JL, Sills EO (2005) Land use and income diversification: comparing traditional and colonist populations in the Brazilian Amazon. Agric Econ 32:221–237. doi:10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00238.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coomes OT, Barham BL (1997) Rain forest extraction and conservation in Amazonia. Geogr J 163(2):180–188. doi:10.2307/3060181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOS (1995) Land use patterns in the divisional secretaries of Badulla District. Department of Survey, Colombo, Sri Lanka

  • Ellis F, Freeman HA (2004) Rural livelihoods and poverty reduction strategies in four African countries. J Dev Stud 40(4):1–30. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ersado L (2003) Income diversification in Zimbabwe. Welfare implications from urban and rural areas. FCND discussion paper no. 152. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C. USA

  • Faris R (1999) Deforestation and land use on evolving frontier: An empirical assessment. HIID development discussion paper No. 678. Cambridge: Harvard Institute for International Development

  • Godoy RA, Bawa KS (1993) The economic value of sustainable harvest of plants and animals from the tropical forest: assumptions, hypotheses and methods. Econ Bot 47(3):215–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy RA, Lubowski R, Markandya A (1993) A method for the economic valuation of non-timber forest products. Econ Bot 47(3):220–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Godoy R, Wilkie D, Overman H, Cubas A, Cubas G, Demmer J et al (2000) Valuation of consumption and sale of forest goods from a Central American rain forest. Nature 406:62–63. doi:10.1038/35017647 Medline

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis, 4th edn edn. Macmillan Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunatilake HM (1998) The role of rural development in protecting tropical rainforests: Evidence from Sri Lanka. J Environ Manage 53:273–292. doi:10.1006/jema.1998.0201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasalkar S, Yadhav Y (2004) Role of women in the use of non-timber forest produce. A review. J Soc Sci 8(3):203–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Heltberg R, Arndt TC, Sekhar NU (2000) Fuelwood consumption and forest degradation: A household model for domestic energy substitution in rural India. Land Econ 76(2):213–232. doi:10.2307/3147225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill M (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54:427–432. doi:10.2307/1934352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak SK, Sills EO (2001) Do tropical forests provide natural insurance? The microeconomics of non-timber forest product collection in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Econ 77(4):595–612. doi:10.2307/3146943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardan T, Taylor JE, Stamoulis K, Lanjouw P, Balisacan A (2000) Effect of non-farm employment on rural income equality in developing countries: an investment perspective. J Agric Econ 51(2):266–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon T, Stamoulis K, Balisacan A, Cruz E, Berdeue J, Banks B (1998) Rural non-farm income in developing countries. Special chapter in The State of food and agriculture, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

  • Reddy S, Chakravarty S (1999) Forest dependency and income distribution in a subsistence economy: Evidence from India. World Dev 27(7):1141–1149. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00057-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repetto R, Gillis M (1998) Public policies and misuse of forest resources. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Pérez M, Ndoye O, Eyebe A, Lema Ngono D (2002) A gender analysis of forest products markets in Cameroon. Afr Today 49(3):96–126. doi:10.2979/AFT.2002.49.3.96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Pérez M, Byron N (1999) A methodology to analyze divergent case studies of non-timber forest products and their development potential. For Sci 45(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr SJ (2000) A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation. Food Policy 25:479–498. doi:10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00022-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shively GE (2001) Agricultural change, rural labor markets and forest clearing: An illustrative case from the Philippines. Land Econ 77(2):268–284. doi:10.2307/3147094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tachibana T, Nguyen TM, Otsuka K (2001) Agricultural intensification versus extensification: A case study of deforestation in the northern hill region of Vietnam. J Environ Econ Manage 41:44–69. doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takashi Y, Barham B, Coomes O (2000) Rapid rural appraisal in humid tropical forests. World Dev 28(11):1961–1977. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(00) 00062-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2004) Small Grants Programme for Operations to Promote Tropical Forests (SGP PTF). Country guideline paper for Sri Lanka (2004–2007), Colombo, Sri Lanka, United Nations Development Program

  • Valdivia C, Dunn E, Jette C (1996) Diversification as a risk management strategy in an Andean agro pastoral community. Am J Agric Econ 78:1329–1334. doi:10.2307/1243516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedeld P, Angelsen A, Sjaastad E, Berg GK (2004) Counting on the environment: Forest incomes and the rural poor. Paper # 98, Washington, DC, The World Bank Environment Department

  • Wickramasinghe A, Ruiz Perez M, Blockhus JM (1996) Non-timber forest product gathering in Ritigala forest (Sri Lanka): Household strategies and community differentiation. Hum Ecol 24(4):493–519. doi:10.1007/BF02168864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder (2001) Poverty alleviation and tropical forests-What scope for synergies? World Dev 29(11):1817–33

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1910 East–West Road, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96822, USA

    Prabodh Illukpitiya & John F. Yanagida

Authors
  1. Prabodh Illukpitiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John F. Yanagida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John F. Yanagida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Illukpitiya, P., Yanagida, J.F. Role of income diversification in protecting natural forests: evidence from rural households in forest margins of Sri Lanka. Agroforest Syst 74, 51–62 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9153-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9153-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation