Abstract
Learning to control forces is known to reduce the amount of movement variability (e.g., standard deviation; SD) while also altering the temporal structure of movement variability (e.g., approximate entropy; ApEn). Such variability control has not been explored in stroke survivors during reaching movements in dynamic environments. Whether augmented feedback affects such variability control, is also unknown. Chronic stroke survivors, assigned randomly to a control/experimental group, learned reaching movements in a dynamically changing environment while receiving either true feedback of their movement (control) or augmented visual feedback (experimental). Hand movement variability was analyzed using SD and ApEn. A significant change in variability was determined for both SD and ApEn. Post hoc tests revealed that the significant decrease in SD was not retained after a week. However, the significant increase in ApEn, determined on both days of training, showed significant retention effects. In dynamically changing environments, chronic stroke survivors reduced the amount of movement variability and made their movement patterns less repeatable and possibly more flexible. These changes were not affected by augmented visual feedback. Moreover, the learning patterns characteristically involved the control of the nonlinear dynamics rather than the amount of hand movement variability. The absence of transfer effects demonstrated that variability control of hand movement after a stroke is specific to the task and the environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bock, O., and S. Schneider. Sensorimotor adaptation in young and elderly humans. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 26:761–767, 2002.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevalence and most common causes of disability among adults—United States, 2005. MMWR Morb. Mortal Wkly. Rep. 58:421–426, 2009.
Christou, E. A., B. Poston, J. A. Enoka, and R. M. Enoka. Different neural adjustments improve endpoint accuracy with practice in young and old adults. J. Neurophysiol. 97:3340–3350, 2007.
Enoka, R. M., E. A. Christou, S. K. Hunter, K. W. Kornatz, J. G. Semmler, A. M. Taylor, et al. Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 1:1–12, 2003.
Folstein, M. F., S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh. “mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J. Psychiatr. Res. 12:189–198, 1975.
Frassinetti, F., V. Angeli, F. Meneghello, S. Avanzi, and E. Ladavas. Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain. 125:608–623, 2002.
Griffin, L., P. E. Painter, A. Wadhwa, and W. W. Spirduso. Motor unit firing variability and synchronization during short-term light-load training in older adults. Exp. Brain Res. 197(4):337–345, 2009. Epub 2009 Jul 4.
Harbourne, R. T., and N. Stergiou. Movement variability and the use of nonlinear tools: principles to guide physical therapist practice. Phys. Ther. 89:267–282, 2009.
Hong, S. L., and K. M. Newell. Entropy conservation in the control of human action. Nonlinear Dyn. Psychol. Life Sci. 12(2):163–190, 2008.
Kornatz, K. W., E. A. Christou, and R. M. Enoka. Practice reduces motor unit discharge variability in a hand muscle and improves manual dexterity in old adults. J. Appl. Physiol. 98:2072–2080, 2005.
Kuznetsov, N. A., and M. A. Riley. Spatial resolution of visual feedback affects variability and structure of isometric force. Neurosci. Lett. 470(2):121–125, 2010. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
Laidlaw, D. H., M. Bilodeau, and R. M. Enoka. Steadiness is reduced and motor unit discharge is more variable in old adults. Muscle Nerve 23:600–610, 2000.
Lipsitz, L. A., and A. L. Goldberger. Loss of “complexity” and aging: potential applications of fractals and chaos theory to senescence. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 267:1806–1809, 1992.
Moritz, C. T., B. K. Barry, M. A. Pascoe, and R. M. Enoka. Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. J. Neurophysiol. 93:2449–2459, 2005.
Mukherjee M, Liu W. Muscle Activation Patterns in Healthy Subjects and Stroke Survivors in an Unpredictable Robotic Environment. Int J Mech Autom 2(1):1-14, 2012.
Nakayama, H., H. S. Jorgensen, H. O. Raaschou, and T. S. Olsen. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75:852–857, 1994.
Newell, K. M., and D. E. Vaillancourt. Dimensional change in motor learning. Hum. Mov. Sci. 20:695–715, 2001.
Newell, K. M., M. P. Broderick, K. M. Deutsch, and A. B. Slifkin. Task goals and change in dynamical degrees of freedom with motor learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29:379–387, 2003.
Patton, J. L., M. E. Stoykov, M. Kovic, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. Exp. Brain Res. 168(3):368–383, 2005.
Pincus, S. M., and A. L. Goldberger. Physiological time-series analysis: what does regularity quantify? Am. J. Physiol. 266(4 Pt 2):H1643–H1656, 1994.
Pincus, S. M. Irregularity and asynchrony in biologic network signals. Methods Enzymol. 321:149–182, 2000.
Reinkensmeyer, D. J., M. G. Iobbi, L. E. Kahn, D. G. Kamper, and C. D. Takahashi. Modeling reaching impairment after stroke using a population vector model of movement control that incorporates neural firing-rate variability. Neural Comput. 15(11):2619–2642, 2003.
Rossetti, Y., G. Rode, L. Pisella, A. Farne, L. Li, D. Boisson, and M. T. Perenin. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 395:166–169, 1998.
Scheidt, R. A., and T. Stoeckmann. Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. J. Neurophysiol. 97(4):2824–2836, 2007. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
Seidler, R. D. Older adults can learn to learn new motor skills. Behav. Brain Res. 183:118–122, 2007.
Sosnoff, J. J., and K. M. Newell. The generalization of perceptual-motor intra-individual variability in young and old adults. J. Gerontol. B 6:304–310, 2006.
Sosnoff, J. J., and S. J. Voudrie. Practice and age-related loss of adaptability in sensorimotor performance. J. Mot. Behav. 41(2):137–146, 2009.
Stergiou, N., U. H. Buzzi, M. J. Kurz, and J. Heidel. Nonlinear tools in human movement. In: Innovative Analysis of Human Movement, edited by N. Stergiou. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2004.
Theiler, J., S. Eubank, A. Longtin, B. Galdrikian, and J. D. Farmer. Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58:77–94, 1992.
Timmer, J., S. Häussler, M. Lauk, and C. H. Lücking. Pathological tremors: deterministic chaos or nonlinear stochastic oscillators? Chaos 10:278, 2000.
Volpe, B. T., M. Ferraro, D. Lynch, P. Christos, J. Krol, C. Trudell, H. I. Krebs, and N. Hogan. Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 5:465–470, 2005.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by grants awarded to Dr. Mukul Mukherjee by the American Heart Association (#0820136Z) and the Alzheimer’s Association, to Mr. Panos Koutakis by the Alexander S. Onassis Public Benefit Foundation and to Dr. Stergiou by the US Department of Education/NIDRR (H133G080023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mukherjee, M., Koutakis, P., Siu, KC. et al. Stroke Survivors Control the Temporal Structure of Variability During Reaching in Dynamic Environments. Ann Biomed Eng 41, 366–376 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0670-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-012-0670-9