Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Ecological and Human Biomonitoring Investigation of Mercury Contamination at the Aamjiwnaang First Nation

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
EcoHealth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Aamjiwnaang First Nations community is located in Canada’s ‘Chemical Valley’ situated in southwest Ontario near Sarnia. Mercury pollution in the region has been known since the 1940s but little is known about levels in the environment and area residents. The current study, using ecological and human exposure assessment methods, was conducted at the community’s request to help fill these gaps. First, Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory and the U.S. Toxics Release Inventory were queried to investigate mercury releases from area facilities. In 2010, 700 pounds of mercury were emitted into the air, 25 pounds were released into water bodies, and 93 thousand pounds were disposed of on-site via underground injections or into landfills, and together these show continued releases into the region. Second, mercury levels were measured in stream sediment and nearby soil from sites at Aamjiwnaang (n = 4) and off Reserve (n = 19) in Canada and the U.S. during three seasons that spanned 2010–2011. Total mercury in sediment across all sites and sampling seasons ranged from 5.0 to 398.7 µg/kg, and in soils ranged from 1.2 to 696.2 µg/kg. Sediment and soil mercury levels at Aamjiwnaang were higher than the reference community, and Aamjiwnaang’s Talfourd Creek site had the highest mercury levels. Third, a biomonitoring study was performed with 43 mother-child pairs. Hair (mean ± SD of all participants: 0.18 ± 0.16 µg/g) and blood (1.6 ± 2.0 µg/L) mercury levels did not differ between participants studied on- and off-Reserve, likely because of limited seafood intake (<1 serving/week). Urine mercury levels (0.5 ± 0.8 µg/L) were significantly higher (1.5–2.5 times) in mother-child pairs living on-Reserve versus those living off-Reserve. In general, the study links evidence of mercury sources, environmental fate, and human exposures, and in doing so it shows that mercury levels in ecological and human samples are similar to values found in other areas, though there are some trends and evidence of contamination at Aamjiwnaang that warrant attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basu N, Abare M, Buchanan S, Cryderman D, Nam D-H, Sirkin S, Schmidtt S, Hu H (2010) A combined ecological and epidemiologic investigation of exposure to metals amongst Indigenous Peoples near the Marlin Mine in Western Guatemala. Science of the Total Environment 409:70–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Basu N, Tutino R, Zhang Z, Cantonwine D, Goodrich J, Somers E, Rodriguez L, Schnaas L, Solano M, Mercado A, Peterson K, Sanchez B, Hernández-Avila M, Hu H, Tellez-Rojo M (2014) Mercury Levels in Pregnant Women, Children, and Seafood from Mexico City. Environmental Research 135: 63–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Buchman M (2008) NOAA OR&R Report 08-1: NOAA Screening Quick Reference Tables. Seattle, WA. Office of Response and Restoration Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, p. 34

  • Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health and Human Services (2012) Fourth National Report on Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals, Updated Tables, September 2012 CDC, Atlanta, GA, pp 308. http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/pdf/FourthReport_UpdatedTables_Sep2012.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2012

  • Chan L, ReceveurO, Batal M, David W, Schwartz H, Ing A, Fediuk K, Black A, Tikhonov C (2014) First Nations Food, Nutrition and Environment Study (FNFNES): Results from Ontario (2011/2012). Ottawa: University of Ottawa

  • Clarkson T (1993) Mercury: major issues in environmental health. Environmental Health Perspectives 100:31–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gewurtz S, Bhavsar S, Jackson D, Fletcher R, Awad E, Moody R, Reiner E (2010) Temporal and spatial trends of organochlorines and mercury in fishes from the St. Clair River/Lake St. Clair corridor, Canada. Journal of Great Lakes Research 3(1):100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez H (1991) Mercury pollution caused by a chlor-alkali plant. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 56(1)83–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrich JM, Chou H-N, Gruninger S, Franzblau A, Basu N (2016) Exposures of Dental Professionals to Elemental Mercury and Methylmercury. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 26:78–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harnly M, Seidel S, Rojas P, Fornes R, Flessel P, Smith D, Kreutzer R, Goldman L (1997) Biological monitoring for mercury within a community with soil and fish contamination. Environmental Health Perspectives 105(4):424–429.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Harris S, Harper B (1997) A Native American exposure scenario. Risk Analysis 17(6):789–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrick C, Goodman E, Guthrie C, Blythe R, Hendriz G, Smith R, Galloway J (1982) A model of mercury contamination in a woodland stream. Journal of Ecological Modelling 15:1–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jarosinka D, Barregard L, Biesiada M, Muszynska-Graca M, Dabkowska B, Denby B, Pacyna J, Fudala J, Zielonka U (2006) Urinary mercury in adults in Poland living near a chloralkali plant. Science of the Total Environment 368: 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnlein H, Receveur O (1996). Dietary change and traditional food systems of indigenous peoples. Annual Review of Nutrition 16:417–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legrand M, Feeley M, Tikhonov C, Schoen D, Li-Muller A (2010) Methylmerury blood guidance value for Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health 101(1): 28–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luginaah I, Smith K, Lockridge A (2010). Surrounded by Chemical Valley and ‘living in a bubble’: the case of the Aamjiwnaang First Nation, Ontario. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 53(3): 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald E, Rang S (2007) Exposing Canada’s Chemical Valley: An Investigation of Cumulative Air Pollution Emissions in the Sarnia. Ontario Area: Ecojustice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch A, Hill K (1989) Distribution of mercury in Lake St. Clair and the St. Clair River sediments. Water Pollution Research Journal of Canada 24(1):1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam D-H, Basu N (2011) Rapid methods to detect organic mercury and total selenium in biological samples. Chemistry Central Journal 5:3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nriagu J, Basu N, Charles S (2012) Environmental justice: the mercury connection. In: Mercury in the Environment: Pattern and Process, Chap. 15. Bank M (editor). Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaee M, Long R, Renne E, Basu N (2015) Mercury exposure assessment and spatial distribution in a Ghanaian small-scale gold mining community. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12(9):10755–10782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • OME (1970) Summary Report on Mercury Pollution of the St. Clair River System. Ontario Water Resources Commission, Ontario Ministry of the Environment.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) Detroit River-Western Lake Erie Basin Indicator Project, Indicator: Mercury in Lake St. Clair Walleye. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997) Mercury study report to congress. Volume 3: Fate and transport of mercury in the environment. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1988) Upper Great Lakes Connecting Channels Study. Washington DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/greatlakes/uglcc/ Accessed 20 June 2015

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sharilyn Johnston, Christine Rogers, Wilson Plain Jr. and members of the Aamjiwnaang Environment Committee for their guidance and support. We thank Mozhgon Rajaee and other lab members for their technical assistance, and Caitlyn Kowalsky and Lawrence Kowalsky for their assistance with human subjects research. DK was supported by a University of Michigan Rackham Graduate Research Fellowship and by the U.S. National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) Environmental Toxicology Research Training Grant (T32 ES07062). The research was funded by the Great Lakes Commission’s GLAD program, the Michigan Institute of Clinical Health Research’s CTSA program (UL1RR024986), and the University of Michigan School of Public Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niladri Basu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cryderman, D., Letourneau, L., Miller, F. et al. An Ecological and Human Biomonitoring Investigation of Mercury Contamination at the Aamjiwnaang First Nation. EcoHealth 13, 784–795 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-016-1162-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-016-1162-4

Keywords

Navigation