Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of lipid shell microbubble on ultrasound mediated EGFP gene delivery to transplanted tumors: initial experience

  • Published:
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of ultrasound (US) mediated enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene delivery in subcutaneous transplanted tumors of human cervical carcinoma (Hela) and the contribution of lipid shell microbubble (LSMB) on gene transfection.

Methods

LSMB and plasmid were injected into nude mice by tail vein followed local US irradiation (P + LSMB + US group). US exposure parameter was set at 2.0 W/cm2, 2 min, duty cycle 20%. EGFP expression was evaluated by imaging for 7 days. Nude mice undergoing plasmid injection alone (P group), plasmid injection and US exposure (P + US group), plasmid and LSMB injection (P + LSMB group) were used as controls. Frozen section and histological examinations were conducted. Expression of EGFP was scored. Kinetics of protein expression post transfection and localization in vivo were evaluated.

Results

Plasmid injection with LSMB plus US exposure strongly increased gene transfer efficiency. Strong EGFP expression was mainly seen in LSMB + P + US group. It was significantly higher than any of the following groups, P group, US + P group, or LSMB + P group (P < 0.01). In vivo expression level of post-US 3 days was significantly higher than any other time points (P < 0.01). There was not significant expression level of EGFP in other organs or tissues regardless of US exposure. No tissue damage was seen histologically.

Conclusion

The combination of LSMB and US exposure could effectively transfer plasmid DNA to transplanted tumors without causing any apparently adverse effect. LSMB could be effective as a non-viral vector system in in vivo gene delivery. It would be a safe gene delivery method and provide an alternative to current clinical gene therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li SD, Huang L. Gene therapy progress and prospects: non-viral gene therapy by systemic delivery. Gene Ther, 2006, 13: 1313–1319.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mehier-Humbert S, Guy RH. Physical methods for gene transfer: improving the kinetics of gene delivery into cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2005, 57: 733–753.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taniyama Y, Tachibana K, Hiraoka K, et al. Development of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle. Gene Ther, 2002, 9: 372–380.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lawrie A, Brisken AF, Francis SE, et al. Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery. Gene Ther, 2000, 7: 2023–2027.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li T, Tachibana K, Kuroki M, et al, Gene transfer with echo-enhanced contrast agents: comparison between Albunex, Optison, and Levovist in mice — initial results. Radiology, 2003, 229: 423–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suzuki R, Takizawa T, Negishi Y, et al. Gene delivery by combination of novel liposomal bubbles with perfluoropropane and ultrasound. J Control Release, 2007, 117: 130–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi M, Kido K, Aoi A, et al. Spinal gene transfer using ultrasound and microbubbles. J Control Release, 2007, 117: 267–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakakima Y, Hayashi S, Yagi Y, et al. Gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. Cancer Gene Ther, 2005, 12: 884–889.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan KB, Gao YH, Liu P, et al. Preparation of lipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent by mechanical shaking: a preliminary experimental study. Chin J Ultrasound Med (Chinese), 2006, 22: 561–563.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sonoda S, Tachibana K, Uchino E, et al. Gene transfer to corneal epithelium and keratocytes mediated by ultrasound with microbubbles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2006, 47: 558–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Unger EC, Matsunaga TO, McCreery T, et al. Therapeutic applications of microbubbles. Eur J Radiol, 2002, 42: 160–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsunoda S, Mazda O, Oda Y, et al, Sonoporation using microbubble BR14 promotes pDNA/siRNA transduction to murine heart. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2005, 336: 118–127.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leong-Poi H, Kuliszewski MA, Lekas M, et al. Therapeutic arteriogenesis by ultrasound-mediated VEGF165 plasmid gene delivery to chronically ischemic skeletal muscle. Circ Res, 2007, 101: 295–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Duvshani-Eshet M, Machluf M. Efficient transfection of tumors facilitated by long-term therapeutic ultrasound in combination with contrast agent: from in vitro to in vivo setting. Cancer Gene Ther, 2007, 14: 306–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hauff P, Seemann S, Reszka R, et al. Evaluation of gas-filled microparticles and sonoporation as gene delivery system: feasibility study in rodent tumor models. Radiology, 2005, 236: 572–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haag P, Frauscher F, Gradl J, et al. Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound to deliver an antisense oligodeoxynucleotide targeting the human androgen receptor into prostate tumours. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 2006, 102: 103–113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ultrasonography, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Zhiyi Chen, Mingxing Xie, Xinfang Wang, Qing Lv & Shangwei Ding

  2. Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Zhiyi Chen, Mingxing Xie, Xinfang Wang, Qing Lv & Shangwei Ding

Authors
  1. Zhiyi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingxing Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xinfang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qing Lv
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shangwei Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mingxing Xie.

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No. 30670548).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Xie, M., Wang, X. et al. Effects of lipid shell microbubble on ultrasound mediated EGFP gene delivery to transplanted tumors: initial experience. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 7, 424–428 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-008-0058-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-008-0058-3

Key words

Search

Navigation