Abstract
Robotic surgery is being performed more frequently for a variety of gastrointestinal procedures. The place of this modality in treating rectal cancer is not yet clearly established. This review evaluates the literature since the first cases described in 2001 to determine the safety of this approach and to determine its advantages and limitations compared to the laparoscopic approach.
Résumé
La chirurgie robotique s’impose dans de nombreux domaines de la chirurgie viscérale. Sa place dans la prise en charge chirurgicale du cancer du rectum n’est pas encore clairement définie. Cet article de synthèse est une étude de la littérature concernant les articles publiés depuis 2001 en rapport avec l’approche robotisée du cancer rectal avec le système Da Vinci® avec pour objectifs de préciser la fiabilité de l’approche et de déterminer notamment ses avantages et ses inconvénients par rapport à l’approche laparoscopique conventionnelle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Références
Baek JH, Pastor C, Pigazzi A (2010) Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a casematched study. Surg Endosc (Epub ahead of print)
Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM, et al. (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22: 1601–1608
Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16: 1480–1487
Ballantyne GH, Merola P, Weber A, et al. (2001) Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 7: 405–412
Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, et al. (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol (Epub ahead of print)
Choi GS, Park IJ, Kang BM, et al. (2009) A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23: 2831–2835
COST Study Group (2004) A comparaison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2050–2059
Davidoff F, Haynes RB, Sackett DL, et al. (1995) Evidence-based medicine. Br Med J 310: 1085–1086
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. (2005) Short-term end points of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer. Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365: 1718–1726
Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JDI, et al. (2007) Short-term outcomes after roboticassited total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14(11): 3168–3173
Ng KH, Lim YK, Ho KS, et al. (2009) Robotic-assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome. Singapore Med J 50(8): 763–767
Park IJ, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. (2009) Multidimensional analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13: 275–281
Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, et al. (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-terme outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol (Epub ahead of print)
Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17: 1614–1620
Ziogas D, Roukos D (2008) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: may it improve also survival? Surg Endosc 22: 1405–1406
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Bresler, L., Germain, A., Ayav, A. et al. Chirurgie robotique et cancer du rectum. Oncologie 13, 35–38 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10269-010-1974-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10269-010-1974-8