Abstract
Biological motion point-light displays provide a powerful method for studying motion perception. Nonhuman animals are capable of discriminating point-light displays, but it remains unknown how they perceive biological motion in these displays. We trained two groups of pigeons to discriminate video stimuli using two different classification rules. The motion-congruent group was trained to discriminate full-detail and corresponding point-light displays of pigeons from full-detail and point-light displays of humans. The motion-incongruent group was trained to discriminate full-detail pigeons and point-light humans from the other displays. Both groups acquired the discrimination. When tested with novel displays, pigeons showed good transfer of learning. Transfer was poorest with the point-light displays in the motion-congruent group. The results indicate that the pigeons failed to make the connection between the full-detail displays and their point-light counterparts even when the common motion was available as a cue.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Blake R (1993) Cats perceive biological motion. Psychol Sci 4:54–57. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00557.x
Brown J, Kaplan G, Rogers LJ, Vallortigara G (2010) Perception of biological motion in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): by females only. Anim Cogn 13:555–564. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0306-0
Cook RG, Katz JS (1999) Dynamic object perception by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 25:194–210. doi:10.1037//0097-7403.25.2.194
Cook RG, Roberts S (2007) The role of video coherence on object-based motion discriminations by pigeons. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 33:287–298. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.33.3.287
Dittrich WH, Lea SEG (1993) Motion as a natural category for pigeons: generalization and a feature-positive effect. J Exp Anal Behav 59:115–129. doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.59-115
Dittrich WH, Lea SEG, Barrett J, Gurr PR (1998) Categorization of natural movements by pigeons: visual concept discrimination and biological motion. J Exp Anal Behav 70:281–299. doi:10.1901/jeab.1998.70-281
Jitsumori M, Natori M, Okuyama K (1999) Recognition of moving video images of conspecifics by pigeons: effects of individuals, static and dynamic motion cues, and movement. Anim Learn Behav 27:303–315. doi:10.3758/BF03199729
Johansson G (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 14:201–211. doi:10.3758/BF03212378
MacKinnon LM, Troje NF, Dringenberg HC (2010) Do rats (Rattus norvegicus) perceive biological motion? Exp Brain Res 205:571–576. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2378-0
Nakayasu T, Watanabe E (2014) Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish. Anim Cogn 17:559–575. doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0687-y
Parron C, Deruelle C, Fagot J (2007) Processing of biological motion point-light displays by baboons (Papio papio). J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 33:381–391. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.381
Qadri MAJ, Cook RG (2015) Experimental divergences in the visual cognition of birds and mammals. Comp Cogn Behav Rev 10:73–105. doi:10.3819/ccbr.2015.100004
Qadri MAJ, Asen Y, Cook RG (2014) Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons. J Vis 14:16. doi:10.1167/14.5.16
Regolin L, Tommasi L, Vallortigara G (2000) Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Anim Cogn 3:53–60. doi:10.1007/s100710050050
Ryan CME, Lea SEG (1994) Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds. Behav Processes 33:155–175. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(94)90064-7
Tomonaga M (2001) Visual search for biological motion patterns in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Psychologia 44:46–59
Troje NF, Aust U (2013) What do you mean with “direction”? Local and global cues to biological motion perception in pigeons. Vision Res 79:47–55. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2013.01.002
Wasserman EA, Kiedinger RE, Bhatt RS (1988) Conceptual behavior in pigeons: categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 14:235–246. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.14.3.235
Watanabe S (1993) Object-picture equivalence in the pigeon: an analysis with natural concept and pseudoconcept discriminations. Behav Processes 30:225–231. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(93)90134-D
Watanabe S, Ito Y (1991) Discrimination of individuals in pigeons. Bird Behav 9:20–29. doi:10.3727/015613890791749136
Yamamoto E, Watanabe S (2007) Dissociation of effects of entopallium lesions upon individual discrimination and behavioral state discrimination in pigeons (Columba livia). In: Watanabe S, Tsujii T, Keenan JP (eds) Comparative social cognition. Keio University Press, Japan, pp 61–77
Acknowledgments
The present research was supported by a grant from the Global Center of Excellence program to Keio University (D09), JSPS KAKENHI (15J09751), and KAKENHI (22700271, 25730100).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamamoto, E., Goto, K. & Watanabe, S. Pigeons (Columba livia) fail to connect dots in learning biological motion. Anim Cogn 18, 1187–1191 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0880-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0880-2