Abstract
Individual differences in impulsivity occur at a cognitive and/or behavioural level and are associated with differing life outcomes. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence to support the long-term stability of these characteristics in non-human animals. This study reports on the stability of convergent measures of impulsivity in domestic dogs assessed more than 6 years apart. Measures were (1) owner assessment by means of a questionnaire, the validated ‘Dog Impulsivity Assessment Scale’ (DIAS) and (2) dogs’ performance in a delayed reward choice test. Dogs had 15-min free access to two food dispensers, one dispensing a piece of food immediately, the other dispensing three pieces after a delay, which increased by 1 s every other time the dogs sampled it. Maximum delay reached in this task reflects decision-making, or cognitive impulsivity, whereas the rate of extra presses on the delayed reward device during the delay can be considered as a measure of motor or behavioural impulsivity. DIAS scores were strongly and significantly correlated across years. The maximum delay reached in the behaviour test was also highly stable, whereas paw-pressing rate was uncorrelated between the years. These results demonstrate that cognitive but not motor impulsivity is highly consistent over time in dogs.
References
Anokhin AP, Golosheykin S, Grant JD, Heath AC (2011) Heritability of delay discounting in adolescence: a longitudinal twin study. Behav Genet 41:175–184. doi:10.1007/s10519-010-9384-7
Arce E, Santisteban C (2006) Impulsivity: a review. Psicothema 18:213–220
Audrain-McGovern J, Rodriguez D, Epstein LH, Cuevas J, Rodgers K, Wileyto EP (2009) Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking? Drug Alcohol Depend 103(3):99–106
Casey BJ, Somerville LH, Gotlib IH, Ayduk O, Franklin NT, Askren MK, Jonides J, Berman MG, Wilson NL, Teslovich T, Glover G, Zavas V, Mischel W, Shoda Y (2011) Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later. PNAS 108:14998–15003. doi:10.1073/pnas.1108561108
Cervantes MC, Delville Y (2009) Serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT3 receptors in an impulsive-aggressive phenotype. Behav Neurosci 123:589–598. doi:10.1037/a0015333
Cherek DR, Moeller FG, Dougherty DM, Rades H (1997) Studies of violent and nonviolent male parolees: II. Laboratory and psychometric measurements of impulsivity. Biol Psychiatry 41:523–529
Dougherty DM, Bjork JM, Harper RA, Marsh DM, Moeller FG, Mathias CW, Swann AC (2003) Behaviorial impulsivity paradigms: a comparison in hospitalized adolescents with disruptive behaviour disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 44:1145–1157. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00197
Fratkin L, Sinn DL, Patall EA, Gosling SD (2013) Personality consistency in dogs: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e54907. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0054907
Jimura K, Chushak MS, Braver TS (2013) Impulsivity and self-control during interfemoral decision making linked to the neural dynamics of reward value representation. J Neurosci 33:344–357
Kalenscher T, Ohmann T, Güntürkün O (2006) The neuroscience of impulsive and self-controlled decisions. Int J Psychophsiol 62:203–211
Kirby KN (2009) One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychon Bull Rev 16:457–462
Lessells CM, Boag PT (1987) Unrepeatable repeatability’s: a common mistake. Auk 104:116–121
Logue AW, Peña-Correal TE (1985) The effect of food deprivation on self control. Behav Process 10:355–368. doi:10.1016/0376-63578590036-1
Mills DS (2010) Personality. In: Mills DS (ed) Encyclopaedia of applied animal behaviour. CABI, Wallingford, pp 463–465
Mischel W, Shoda Y, Peake EK (1988) The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. J Pers Soc Psychol 54:687–696. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.978
Odum AL (2011) Delay discounting: trait variable? Behav Process 87:1–9
Réale D, Reader SM, Sol D, McDougall PT, Dingemanse NJ (2007) Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol Rev 82:291–318
Reynolds B (2006) A review of delay-discounting research with humans: relations to drug use and gambling. Behav Pharmacol 17:651–667. doi:10.1097/FBP.0b013e3280115f99
Stamps J, Groothuis TG (2010) The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives. Biol Rev 85:301–325. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00103.x
Van den Berg L, Schilder MBH, de Vries H, Leegwater PAG, van Oost BA (2006) Phenotyping of aggressive behaviour in Golden retriever dogs with a questionnaire. Behav Genet 36:882–902
Van den Bergh F, Spronk M, Ferreira L, Bloemarts E, Groenink L, Olivier B, Oosting R (2006) Relationship of delay aversion and response inhibition to extinction learning, aggression, and sexual behaviour. Behav Brain Res 175:75–81. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.003
Winstanley CA, Eagle DM, Robbins TW (2006) Behaviorial models of impulsivity in relation to ADHD: translation between clinical and preclinical studies. Clin Psychol Rev 26:379–395. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.01.001
Wright HF, Mills DS, Pollux PMJ (2011) Development and validation of a psychometric tool for assessing impulsivity in the domestic dog Canis familiaris. Int J Comp Psychol 24:210–225. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.019
Wright HF, Mills DS, Pollux PMJ (2012) Behavioural and physiological correlates of impulsivity in the domestic dog Canis familiaris. Physiol Behav 105:676–682. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.019
Zaichenko MI, Merzhanova GKh (2011) Studies of impulsivity in rats in conditions of choice between food reinforcements of different value. Neurosci Behav Physiol 41:445–451
Acknowledgments
This research was financed by an Exchange Visit Grant awarded to SR by CompCog, an European Science Fund (ESF) Research Networking Programme. SR is furthermore funded by the FWF (Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung) Project P21418 and the DK CogCom Programme (FWF Doctoral Programmes W1234). Our thanks go to Raquel Matos for help with experiments, Tom Pike, Claudia Wascher and an anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on the manuscript and to the dog owners and our canine participants for taking part in this study.
Ethical standard
This research was approved by the University of Lincoln’s ethics committee and complies with British animal welfare legislation.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riemer, S., Mills, D.S. & Wright, H. Impulsive for life? The nature of long-term impulsivity in domestic dogs. Anim Cogn 17, 815–819 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0701-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-013-0701-4