Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) applications have rapidly gained renewed popularity and are extensively employed for replicating real-life scenarios that may otherwise be impractical to recreate. All such VR applications require that the environments being used provide high levels of immersion and mimic their real-world counterpart in terms of size, distance, depth, and action capabilities. Many VR applications being developed for training and entertainment require users to traverse an immersive virtual environment (IVE), where determining whether one can pass through an opening or aperture is one of the most frequently made decisions. In this experiment, we empirically compare passability judgments made in an IVE to those made in the real world. Participants judged whether they could pass through various widths of an adjustable sliding doorway in the real world and in a to-scale virtual replica viewed through an HTC Vive head-mounted display. If uncertain of their initial judgments, participants were permitted to walk towards the doorway. Results indicate that participants accurately perceive their ability to pass through doorways in both the real world and VR. However, participants in VR required more exposure to dynamic information via movement through the IVE in order to reach a real-world level of perceptual accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balcetis E, Dunning D (2010) Wishful seeing: more desired objects are seen as closer. Psychol Sci 21(1):147–152
Bhargava A et al (2018) Towards revisiting passability judgments in real and immersive virtual environments. In 2018 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces (VR). https://doi.org/10.1109/vr.2018.8446189
Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW (1992) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks
Buck LE et al (2019) Interpersonal affordances and social dynamics in collaborative immersive virtual environments: passing together through apertures. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics 25(5):2123–2133
Cesari P (2005) An invariant guiding stair descent by young and old adults. Exp Aging Res 31(4):441–455
Cesari P, Formenti F, Olivato P (2003) A common perceptual parameter for stair climbing for children, young and old adults. Hum Mov Sci 22(1):111–124
Creem-Regehr SH et al (2015) Egocentric distance perception in the Oculus Rift (DK2). In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on applied perception—SAP’15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804408.2804422
Fath AJ, Fajen BR (2011) Static and dynamic visual information about the size and passability of an aperture. Perception 40(8):887–904
Franchak JM, Celano EC, Adolph KE (2012) ‘Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion. Exp Brain Res 223(2):301–310
Geuss M et al (2010) Can I pass?: using affordances to measure perceived size in virtual environments. In: The 7th symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization
Geuss MN et al (2015) Effect of display technology on perceived scale of space. Hum Factors 57(7):1235–1247
Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
Grechkin TY et al (2010) How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments? ACM Trans Appl Percep 7(4):1–18
Grechkin TY, Plumert JM, Kearney JK (2014) Dynamic affordances in embodied interactive systems: the role of display and mode of locomotion. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Gr 20(4):596–605
Hofmann DA (1997) An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J Manag 23(6):723–744
Interrante V, Ries B, Anderson L (2006) Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited. In: IEEE virtual reality conference (VR 2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/vr.2006.52
Ishak S, Adolph KE, Lin GC (2008) ‘Perceiving affordances for fitting through apertures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34(6):1501–1514
Janeh O et al (2017) Walking in Virtual Reality. ACM Trans Appl Percep 14(2):1–15
Jones JA et al (2008) The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. In: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization—APGV’08. https://doi.org/10.1145/1394281.1394283
Jones JA et al (2011) Peripheral visual information and its effect on distance judgments in virtual and augmented environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization—APGV’11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2077451.2077457
Jones JA et al (2012) Comparability of narrow and wide field-of-view head-mounted displays for medium-field distance judgments. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on applied perception—SAP’12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2338676.2338701
Kelly JW et al (2013) More than just perception-action recalibration: walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space. Atten Percept Psychophys 75(7):1473–1485
Kelly JW et al (2014) Recalibration of perceived distance in virtual environments occurs rapidly and transfers asymmetrically across scale. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Gr 20(4):588–595
Kelly JW, Cherep LA, Siegel ZD (2017) Perceived Space in the HTC Vive. ACM Trans Appl Percept 15(1):2:1–2:16
Kenyon RV et al (2008) Accommodation and size-constancy of virtual objects. Ann Biomed Eng 36(2):342–348
Klein E, Swan JE, Schmidt GS, Livingston MA, Staadt OG (2009) Measurement protocols for medium-field distance perception in large-screen immersive displays. In: 2009 IEEE virtual reality conference. IEEE, pp 107–113
Knapp J, Loomis J (2003) Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In: Virtual and adaptive environments, pp 21–46
Konczak J, Meeuwsen HJ, Cress ME (1992) Changing affordances in stair climbing: the perception of maximum climbability in young and older adults. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18(3):691–697
Kuhl SA, Creem-Regehr SH, Thompson WB (2010) Individual differences in accuracy of blind walking to targets on the floor. J Vis 6(6):726
Lappin JS, Shelton AL, Rieser JJ (2006) Environmental context influences visually perceived distance. Percept Psychophys 68(4):571–581
Li B, Walker J, Kuhl SA (2018) The effects of peripheral vision and light stimulation on distance judgments through HMDs. ACM Trans Appl Percept 15(2):1–14
Lin Q, Rieser J, Bodenheimer B (2015) Affordance judgments in HMD-based virtual environments. ACM Trans Appl Percept 12(2):1–21
Loomis JM, Philbeck JW (2008) Measuring spatial perception with spatial updating and action. In: Embodiment, ego-space, and action. Psychology Press, pp 17–60
Napieralski PE et al (2011) Near-field distance perception in real and virtual environments using both verbal and action responses. ACM Trans Appl Percept 8(3):1–19
Nguyen TD et al (2009) Effects of scale change on distance perception in virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 6th symposium on applied perception in graphics and visualization—APGV’09. https://doi.org/10.1145/1620993.1620999
Pagano CC, Isenhower RW (2008) Expectation affects verbal judgments but not reaches to visually perceived egocentric distances. Psychon Bull Rev 15(2):437–442
Peng C-YJ, Lee KL, Ingersoll GM (2002) An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting. J Educ Res 96(1):3–14
Pointon G, Thompson C, Creem-Regehr S, Stefanucci J, Joshi M, Paris R, Bodenheimer B (2018) Judging action capabilities in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. ACM, p 6
Proffitt DR et al (2003) The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychol Sci 14(2):106–112
Renner RS, Velichkovsky BM, Helmert JR (2013) The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments—a review. ACM Comput Surv 46(2):1–40
Siegel ZD, Kelly JW (2017) Walking through a virtual environment improves perceived size within and beyond the walked space. Atten Percept Psychophys 79(1):39–44
Stefanucci JK, Geuss MN (2009) Big people, little world: the body influences size perception. Perception 38(12):1782–1795
Stefanucci JK, Gagnon KT, Lessard DA (2011) Follow your heart: emotion adaptively influences perception. Soc Pers Psychol Compass 5(6):296–308
Stefanucci JK et al (2012) Evaluating the accuracy of size perception in real and virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the ACM symposium on applied perception—SAP’12. https://doi.org/10.1145/2338676.2338692
Stefanucci JK et al (2015) Evaluating the accuracy of size perception on screen-based displays: displayed objects appear smaller than real objects. J Exp Psychol Appl 21(3):215–223
Thompson WB et al (2004) Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Pres Teleoper Virt Environ 13(5):560–571
Warren WH Jr (1984) Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10(5):683–703
Warren WH Jr, Whang S (1987) Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 13(3):371–383
Witt JK, Proffitt DR, Epstein W (2004) Perceiving distance: a role of effort and intent. Perception 33(5):577–590
Witt JK et al (2007) Seeing beyond the target: environmental context affects distance perception. Perception 36(12):1752–1768
Woltman H et al (2012) An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tut Quant Methods Psychol 8(1):52–69
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 31723 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhargava, A., Lucaites, K.M., Hartman, L.S. et al. Revisiting affordance perception in contemporary virtual reality. Virtual Reality 24, 713–724 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00432-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00432-y