Skip to main content
Log in

Advantages of flexible musculoskeletal robot structure in sensory acquisition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Artificial Life and Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphological computation is the concept for which a well-designed hardware can bear part of the computational cost required for robot’s control and perception. So far, many musculoskeletal robots have been developed by taking inspiration from human’s one and shown superior motion performances. The use of pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs) has been the key to realize these high performance. Additionally, PAMs have the possibility of being used as sensors for environmental information because they are flexible and backdrivable. In this research, we focus on clarifying how PAMs can contribute to morphological computation of robots driven by these actuators. In particular, we propose an analysis method based on transfer entropy and apply this method to the experimental data acquired by a musculoskeletal robot that opens a door.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pfeifer R, Bongard J (2006) How the body shapes the way we think. In: A new view of intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge

  2. Niiyama R, Nishikawa S, Kuniyoshi Y (2010) Athlete robot with applied human muscle activation patterns for bipedal running. In: Proceedings of IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots (Humanoids 2010), pp 498–503

  3. Niiyama R, Nagakubo A, Kuniyoshi Y (2007) Mowgli: a bipedal jumping and landing robot with an artificial musculoskeletal system. In: Proceedings of IEEE-RAS international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA 2007), pp 2546–2551 (ThC5.2)

  4. Hosoda K, Takayama H, Takuma T (2008) Bouncing monopod with bio-mimetic muscular-skeleton system. In: Proceedings of IEEE-RAS international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS2008), pp 3083–3088

  5. Neumann DA, Wong DL (2002) Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: foundations for physical rehabilitation. Mosby, St Louis

  6. Arieta AH, Yokoi H (2004) Integration of a multi-d.o.f. individual adaptable with tactile feedback for an emg prosthetic system. Intell Auton Syst 8:1013–1021

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chou CP, Hannaford B (1996) Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 12(1):90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tondu B, Ippolito S, Guiochet J, Daidie A (2005) A seven degrees-of-freedom robot-arm driven by pneumatic artificial muscle for humanoid robots. Int J Robot Res 24(4):257–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakamura N, Sekiguchi M, Kawashima K, Kagawa T, Fujita T (2002) Developing a robot arm using pneumatic artificial rubber muscles. Bath workshop on power transmission and motion control, pp 365–376

  10. Yoshikawa Y, Sumioka H, Asada M (2009) Learning of joint attention from detecting causality based on transfer entropy. J Robot Mechatron 20(3):378–385

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuhei Ikemoto.

About this article

Cite this article

Ikemoto, S., Nishigori, Y. & Hosoda, K. Advantages of flexible musculoskeletal robot structure in sensory acquisition. Artif Life Robotics 17, 63–69 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-012-0017-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10015-012-0017-5

Keywords

Navigation