Skip to main content
Log in

A nonstoichiometric structural model to characterize changes in the nickel hydroxide electrode during cycling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experimental capacities and mass changes are recorded using an electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance during the first nine charge and discharge cycles of nickel hydroxide thin films cycled in 3.0 weight percent (wt%) potassium hydroxide electrolyte. For the first time, the film capacities have been corrected for the oxygen evolution side reaction, and the data used as input into a point defect-containing structural model to track the changes that occur during short-term cycling. Variations in capacity and mass during formation and charge/discharge cycling are related to changes in the point defect parameters, thus providing a structural origin for the unique experimental variations observed here and often reported in the literature, but previously unexplained. Proton-, potassium-, and water-content vary in the active material during charge/discharge cycling. The observed capacity loss, or “capacity fade,” is explained by incomplete incorporation of potassium ions in (or near) the nickel vacancy during charge, as additional protons are then allowed to occupy the vacant lattice site. The increase in water content during reduction parallels the expansion of the electrode that is well known during cycling. This result confirms the origin of the swelling phenomenon as being caused by water incorporation. The model and methodology developed in this paper can be used to correlate electrochemical signatures with material chemical structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. These four end-member materials have the same crystal structure. This structure is different from those proposed for α-Ni (OH)2 and β-Ni (OH)2. Coefficients, 2s and 3s, have been added to the traditional β, α, and γ designations of the “phases” to more clearly differentiate the unique materials, yet retain the connection to the older literature designations and Eq. 1 . Also the β forms are unambiguously defined.

Abbreviations

E :

electrode potential, V

F :

Faraday’s constant, 96487 C/eq.

I :

applied current, A

i o,ox :

exchange current for the oxygen evolution reaction, A

i ox :

current expended for oxygen evolution, A

m :

mass of the film, g

M :

molecular weight of the film, g/mole Ni

n :

the average proton occupancy of a nickel vacancy

Ox :

oxidation state

Q :

capacity per unit mass of film, C/g

R :

universal gas constant, 8.314 J/mol K

T :

temperature, K

t :

time, s

U ref,ox :

standard potential of the oxygen evolution reaction, V

V Ni :

a vacant nickel lattice site

x :

moles of vacancies per mole of lattice sites

X w :

moles of water per mole of lattice sites

y :

moles of vacancies occupied by potassium ions per mole of lattice sites

z :

moles of exchangeable protons on interlamellar H+ sites (0≤z≤1)

αa :

anodic transfer coefficient

Δ:

change in variable

ε:

efficiency of the nickel reaction

λ1 :

moles of OH ions per mole Ni

λ2 :

moles of K+ ions per mole Ni

λ3 :

moles of water per mole Ni

λ4 :

number of electrons per mole Ni

1:

discharged state, nickel hydroxide

2:

charged state, oxyhydroxide

0:

as-deposited film

References

  1. McBreen J (Ed) (1990) The nickel oxide electrode. Plenum, New York

  2. Delichere P, Joiret S, Hugot-le Goff A, Bange K, Hetz B (1988) J Electrochem Soc 135:1856

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carpenter MK, Conell RS, Corrigan DA (1987) Solar Energy Mater 16:333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gross S (1977), Review of electrochemical impregnation of nickel cadmium cells. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

  5. Barnard R, Randall CF, Tye FL (1980) J Appl Electrochem 10:109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barnard R, Randall CF, Tye FL (1981) J Appl Electrochem 11:517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim M, Hwang T, Kim K (1997) J Electrochem Soc 144:1537

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim M, Kim K (1998) J Electrochem Soc 145:507

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Timmerman P, Ratnakumar BV, Di Stefano S (1996) In: Bennet PD, Gross S (Eds) Aqueous batteries, PV 96-16, p 130. The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ

  10. Bode H, Dehmelt K, Witte J (1969), Z anorg Chem 366:1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cornilsen BC, Karjala PJ, Loyselle PL (1988) J Power Sources 22:351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cornilsen BC, Shan X, Loyselle PL (1990) J Power Sources 29:453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheek GT, O’Grady WE (1997) J Electroanal Chem 421:173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernard P, Gabrielli C, Keddam M, Takenouti H, Leonardi J, Blanchard P (1991) Electrochim Acta 36:743

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mo Y, Hwang E, Scherson DA (1996) J Electrochem Soc 143:37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cordoba-Torresi SI, Gabrielli C, Hugot-Le Goff A, Torresi R (1991) J Electrochem Soc 138:1548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haring P, Kotz R (1995) J Electroanal Chem 385:273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kowal A, Niewiara R, Peronczyk B, Haber J (1996) Langmuir 12:2332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalu EE, Srinivasan V, Nwaoga T, Weidner JW (1999) In: Halpert G, Gopikanth ML, Abraham KM, Cieslak WR, Adams WA (Eds) Selected battery topics, PV 98-15, p 639. The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ

  20. Streinz CC, Hartman AP, Motupally S, Weidner JW (1995) J Electrochem Soc 142:1084

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Barnard R, Randell CF, Tye FL (1981) J Appl Electrochem 11:517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Corrigan DA, Knight SL (1989) J Electrochem Soc 136:613

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Loyselle PL, Karjala PJ, Cornilsen BC (1986) In: Selman RJ, Maru HC (Eds) Electrochemical and thermal modeling of battery, fuel cell and photoenergy conversion systems, PV 86-12, p 114. The Electrochemical Society Proceedings Series, Pennington, NJ

  24. Streinz CC, Motupally S, Weidner JW (1995) J Electrochem Soc 143:4051

    Google Scholar 

  25. Srinivasan V, Weidner JW, Newman J (2001) J Electrochem Soc 148:A969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bode H, Dehmelt K, Witte J (1966) Electrochim Acta 11:1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Barnard R, Randall CF (1982) J Appl Electrochem 12:27

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ruetschi P (1984) J Elelctrochem Soc 131:2737

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Office of Research and Development of the United States Central Intelligence Agency and the US Department of Energy under Cooperative Agreement No. DE-FCO2–91ER75666.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John W. Weidner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, V., Cornilsen, B.C. & Weidner, J.W. A nonstoichiometric structural model to characterize changes in the nickel hydroxide electrode during cycling. J Solid State Electrochem 9, 61–76 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-004-0525-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10008-004-0525-x

Keywords

Navigation