Skip to main content
Log in

Development of gelatin flakes, a new type of anti-adhesive material: a preliminary study of in vivo rat adhesion models

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To overcome the problems associated with sheet- or film-type anti-adhesive materials, we developed a new type of anti-adhesive material, gelatin flakes. We made two types of gelatin flakes with or without thermal cross-linking, and preliminarily examined their basic properties and the anti-adhesive efficacy using a rodent adhesion model. Both types of the gelatin flakes rapidly turned into gel and tightly attached the injured surfaces, absorbing the moisture and blood, when applied onto the abraded sites of rats. In addition, these flakes could be sprayed into the desired area by compressed air through a device with a long, thin tube, which could be used in laparoscopic surgery. The anti-adhesive effects of both types of gelatin flakes were similar, and both types were significantly superior compared to the non-treated group. Although further investigations are necessary, the gelatin flakes have unique and useful properties and satisfactory anti-adhesive effects, which indicate that they may be applicable in laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Beck DE, Opelka FG, Bailey HR, Rauh SM, Pashos CL. Incidence of small-bowel obstruction and adhesiolysis after open colorectal and general surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:241–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thompson JN, Parker MC, Wilson MS, Menzies D, et al. Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;353:1467–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, Dervenis C, Young R. Peritoneal adhesions: ethiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Dig Surg. 2001;18:260–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boland GM, Weigel RJ. Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2006;132:3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burns JW, Colt MJ, Burgees LS, Skinner KC. Preclinical evaluation of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;57:40–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, Beck DE, Stryker SJ, Wexner SD, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective randomized double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:297–306.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Diamond MP. Reduction of adhesions after uterine myomectomy by Seprafilm membrane (HAL-F): a blinded, prospective randomized, multicenter clinical study: Seprafilm Adhesion Study Group. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:904–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fazio VW, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, van Goor H, Bauer JJ, Wolff BG, et al. Reduction in adhesive small-bowel obstruction by Seprafilm adhesion barrier after intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck DE, Cohen Z, Fleshman JW, Kaufman H, van Goor H, Wolff BG. A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1310–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zeng Q, Yu Z, You J, Zhang Q. Efficacy and safety of Seprafilm for preventing postoperative abdominal adhesion: systemic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2007;31:2125–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsujimoto H, Tanzawa A, Matoba M, Hashimoto A, Suzuki S, Morita S, et al. The anti-adhesive effect of thermally cross-linked gelatin film and its influence on the intestinal anastomosis in canine models. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2013;101:99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirasaki Y, Fukunaga M, Kidokoro A, Hashimoto A, Nakamura T, Tsujimoto H, et al. Development of a novel antiadhesive material, alginate flakes, ex vivo and in vivo. Surg Today. 2011;41:970–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Correll JT, Wise EC. Certain properties of a new physiologically absorbable sponge. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1945;58:233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Correll JT, Vanderpoel JC. Biological absorption of insolubilized gelatin film. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1949;71:134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuda S, Se N, Iwata H, Ikada Y. Evaluation of the antiadhesion potential of UV cross-linked gelatin films in a rat abdominal model. Biomaterials. 2002;23:2901–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Tsujimoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsujimoto, H., Takamori, H., Tsuji, M. et al. Development of gelatin flakes, a new type of anti-adhesive material: a preliminary study of in vivo rat adhesion models. Surg Today 44, 391–394 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0608-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-013-0608-3

Keywords

Navigation