Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predictions in ungauged basins: an approach for regionalization of hydrological models considering the probability distribution of model parameters

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regionalization of model parameters by developing appropriate functional relationship between the parameters and basin characteristics is one of the potential approaches to employ hydrological models in ungauged basins. While this is a widely accepted procedure, the uniqueness of the watersheds and the equifinality of parameters bring lot of uncertainty in the simulations in ungauged basins. This study proposes a method of regionalization based on the probability distribution function of model parameters, which accounts the variability in the catchment characteristics. It is envisaged that the probability distribution function represents the characteristics of the model parameter, and when regionalized the earlier concerns can be addressed appropriately. The method employs probability distribution of parameters, derived from gauged basins, to regionalize by regressing them against the catchment attributes. These regional functions are used to develop the parameter characteristics in ungauged basins based on the catchment attributes. The proposed method is illustrated using soil water assessment tool model for an ungauged basin prediction. For this numerical exercise, eight different watersheds spanning across different climatic settings in the USA are considered. While all the basins considered in this study were gauged, one of them was assumed to be ungauged (pseudo-ungauged) in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology in ungauged basin simulation. The process was repeated by considering representative basins from different climatic and landuse scenarios as pseudo-ungauged. The results of the study indicated that the ensemble simulations in the ungauged basins were closely matching with the observed streamflow. The simulation efficiency varied between 57 and 61 % in ungauged basins. The regional function was able to generate the parameter characteristics that were closely matching with the original probability distribution derived from observed streamflow data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulla FA, Lettenmaier DP (1997) Development of regional estimation equations for a macroscale hydrologic model. J Hydrol 197:230–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Engel B, Hantush M (2007) Multiobjective sensitivity analysis of sediment and nitrogen processes with a watershed model. Water Resour Res 43(6):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Allen PM, Bernhardt G (1993) A comprehensive surface-ground water flow model. J Hydrol 142(1–4):47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling assessment: part I. Model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(1):73–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Athira P, Sudheer KP (2014) A method to reduce the computational requirement while assessing uncertainty of complex hydrological models. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0958-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Athira P, Sudheer KP, Cibin R, Chaubey I (2011) Sensitivity analysis of stream flow generation parameters of SWAT model. Paper No. 1111731, Annual Conference of the ASABE, Louisville, KY

  • Bao Zhenxin, Zhang Jianyun, Liu Jiufu, Guobin Fu, Wang Guoqing, He Ruimin, Yan Xiaolin, Jin Junliang, Liu Hongwei (2012) Comparison of regionalization approaches based on regression and similarity for predictions in ungauged catchments under multiple hydro-climatic conditions. J Hydrol 466–467:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardossy A (2007) Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:703–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastola S, Ishidaira H, Takeuchi K (2008) Regionalization of hydrological model parameters under parameter uncertainty: a case study involving TOPMODEL and basins across the globe. J Hydrol 357:188–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (2000) On model uncertainty, risk and decision making. Hydrol Process 14(14):2605–2606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Binley AM (1992) The future of distributed models: Model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298. doi:10.1002/hyp.3360060305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K, Freer J (2001) Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the glue methodology. J Hydrol 249(14):11–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulygina N, McIntyre N, Wheater H (2009) Conditioning rainfall-runoff model parameters for ungauged catchments and land management impacts analysis. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:893–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buytaert W, Beven K (2009) Regionalization as a learning process. Water Resour Res 45:W11419. doi:10.1029/2008WR007359

    Google Scholar 

  • Carota C, Parmigiani G, Polson NG (1996) Diagnostic measures for model. J Am Stat Assoc 91(434):753–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellarin A (2014) Regional prediction of flow-duration curves using a three-dimensional kriging. J Hydrol 513:179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellarin A, Camorani G, Brath A (2007) Predicting annual and long-term flow-duration curves in ungauged basins. Adv Water Resour 30(4):937–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaubey I, Costello TA, White KL, Cotter AS (2003) Stochastic validation of SWAT model. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on total maximum daily load (TMDL) environmental regulations–II. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, pp 168–176

  • Chiang SM, Tsay TK, Nix SJ (2002) Hydrologic regionalization of watersheds. I: methodology development. J Water Resour Plan Manag 128(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cibin (2008) Application of spatially distributed hydrological models for predictions in ungauged basins: an approach to minimize predictive uncertainty. Indian Institute of technology, Chennai

  • Cibin R, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2010) Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model. Hydrol Process 24(9):1133–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cibin R, Athira P, Sudheer KP, Chaubey I (2014) Application of distributed hydrological models for predictions in ungauged basins: a method to quantify predictive uncertainty. Hydrol Process. doi:10.1002/hyp.9721

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolinsky JU, Jenkinson ID, Colquhoun GJ (2007) Application of genetic programming to the calibration of industrial robots. Comput Ind 58(3):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez W, Vogel RM, Sankarasubramanian A (2000) Regional calibration of a watershed model. Hydrol Sci J 45(5):689–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs MS, Maier HR, Dandy GC (2012) A generic framework for regression regionalization in ungauged catchments. Environ Model Softw 27–28:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami M, O’Connor KM, Bhattarai KP (2007) Development of regionalization procedures using a multi-model approach for flow simulation on an ungauged catchment. J Hydrol 333:517–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotzinger J, Bardossy A (2007) Comparison of four regionalization methods for a distributed hydrological model. J Hydrol 333:374–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan CT (2002) Statistical methods in hydrology. Iowa State Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • He M, Hogue TS, Franz KJ, Margulis SA, Vrugt JA (2011) Corruption of parameter behavior and regionalization by model and forcing data errors: a Bayesian example using the SNOW17 model. Water Resour Res 47:W07546. doi:10.1029/2010WR009753

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelmans G, Muys B, Feyen J (2006) Regionalization of the parameters of a hydrological model: comparison of linear regression models with artificial neural network. J Hydrol 319:245–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes DA (2010) Hydrological models: mathematics or science? Hydrol Process 24:2199–2201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundecha Y, Bardossy A (2004) Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. J Hydrol 292:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin X, Xu C-Y, Zhang Q, Singh VP (2010) Parameter and modeling uncertainty simulated by GLUE and a formal Bayesian method for a conceptual hydrological model. J Hydrol 383:147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokkonen T, Jakeman AJ, Young PC, Koivusalo HJ (2003) Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina. Hydrol Process 17(11):2219–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koza John R (1992) Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuczera G, Mroczkowski M (1998) Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of data. Water Resour Res 34(6):1481–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb R, Crewett J, Kay AL (2000) Progress in the spatial generalization of continuous simulation flood frequency modeling. In: River flood defence, vol. 1, edited by: Toensmann, F. and Koch, M., Kassel Rep. Hydraul Eng 9:117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Xia J, Xu CY, Singh VP (2010) Evaluation of the subjective factors of the GLUE method and comparison with the formal Bayesian method in uncertainty assessment of hydrological models. J Hydrol 390(3–4):210–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay DJC (2003) Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-64298-1

  • Madsen H (2003) Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modeling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Adv Water Resour 26:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masih I, Uhlenbrook S, Maskey S, Ahmad MD (2010) Regionalization of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model based on similarity of the flow duration curve: a case study from the semi-arid Karkheh basin, Iran. J Hydrol 391:188–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre N, Lee H, Wheater H, Young A, Wagener T (2005) Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments. Water Resour Res 41(12):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz R, Bloschl G (2004) Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. J Hydrol 287:95–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR, King KW (2002) Soil water assessment tool theoretical documentation. Version 2000. Texas Water Resource Institute, college station, Texas. TWRI Report, TR-191

  • Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2005) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2005. USDA‐ARS Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple. www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/doc.html. Accessed 1 November 2006

  • Oudin L, Andréassian V, Perrin C, Michel C, Le Moine N (2008) Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: a comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. Water Resour Res 44:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudin L, Kay A, Andréassian V, Perrin C (2010) Are seemingly physically similar catchments truly hydrologically similar? Water Resour Res 46:W11558. doi:10.1029/2009WR008887

    Google Scholar 

  • Palanisamy B, Workman SR (2014) Observed hydrographs: on their ability to infer a time-invariant hydrological transfer function for flow prediction in ungauged basins. Hydrol Process 28:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parajka J, Merz R, Bloschl G (2005) A comparison of regionalization methods for catchment model parameters. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil S, Stieglitz M (2012) Controls on hydrologic similarity: role of nearby gauged catchments for prediction at an ungauged catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:551–562. doi:10.5194/hess-16-551-2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razavi T, Coulibaly P (2013) Streamflow prediction in ungauged basins: review of regionalization methods. J Hydrol Eng 18:958–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaniego L, Bárdossy A, Kumar R (2010) Streamflow prediction in ungauged catchments using copula-based dissimilarity measures. Water Resour Res 46:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel J, Coulibaly P, Metcalfe R (2011) Estimation of continuous streamflow in Ontario ungauged basins: comparison of regionalization methods. J Hydrol Eng 16:447–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert Jan (1999) Regionalization of parameters for a conceptual rainfall-runoff model. Agric For Meteorol 98:279–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivapalan M, Takeuchi K, Franks SW, Gupta VK, Karambiri H, Lakshmi V, Liang X, Mcdonnell JJ, Mendiondo EM, O’connell PE, Oki T, Pomeroy JW, Schertzer D, Uhlenbrook S, Zehe E (2003) IAHS decade on predictions in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences. Hydrol Sci J 48(6):857–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobol IM (1993) Sensitivity estmates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math Model Comput Exp 1:404–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 38(6):913–920. doi:10.1029/tr038i006p00913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun W, Ishidaira H, Bastola S (2012) Calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins based on satellite radar altimetry observations of river water level. Hydrol Process 26:3524–3537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Bouten W, Sorooshian S (2003) A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters. Water Resour Res 39(8):1201. doi:10.1029/2002WR001642

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrugt JA, Braak CJF, Gupta HV, Robinson BA (2008) Equifinality of formal (DREAM) and informal (GLUE) Bayesian approaches in hydrologic modeling? Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:1011–1026. doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0274-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagener T, Wheater HS (2006) Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty. J Hydrol 320:132–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagener T, Wheater HS, Gupta HV (2004) Rainfall–runoff modelling in gauged and ungauged catchments. Imperial College Press, London, p 300

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winsemius HC, Schaefli B, Montanari A, Savenije HHG (2009) On the calibration of hydrological models in ungauged basins: a framework for integrating hard and soft hydrological information. Water Resour Res 45:W12422. doi:10.1029/2009WR007706

    Google Scholar 

  • Worzel WP, Yu J, Almal A, Chinnaiyan AM (2009) Applications of genetic programming in cancer research. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 41(2):405–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong LH, Wan M, Wei XJ, O’Connor KM (2009) Indices for assessing the prediction bounds of hydrological models and application by generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation. Hydrol Sci J 54(5):852–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav M, Wagener T, Gupta H (2007) Regionalization of constraints on expected watershed response behavior for improved predictions in ungauged basins. Adv Water Resour 30(8):1756–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wagener T, Reed P, Bhushan R (2008) Reducing uncertainty in predictions in ungauged basins by combining hydrologic indices regionalization and multiobjective optimization. Water Resour Res 44(10):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Vaze J, Chiew FHS, Teng J, Li M (2014) Predicting hydrological signatures in ungauged catchments using spatial interpolation, index model, and rainfall–runoff modelling. J Hydrol 517:936–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H (2007) A multi-objective genetic programming approach to developing Pareto optimal decision trees. Decis Support Syst 43(3):809–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India

    P. Athira & K. P. Sudheer

  2. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    R. Cibin

  3. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering and Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    I. Chaubey

Authors
  1. P. Athira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. P. Sudheer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Cibin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Chaubey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. P. Sudheer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Athira, P., Sudheer, K.P., Cibin, R. et al. Predictions in ungauged basins: an approach for regionalization of hydrological models considering the probability distribution of model parameters. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30, 1131–1149 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1190-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1190-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation