Skip to main content
Log in

Nitrogen, phosphorus and light effects on growth and allocation of biomass and nutrients in wild rice

  • Physiological ecology - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Separating plastic from ontogenetic and growth-limiting responses of plants to changes in resource availability can be challenging because there are a total of eight combinations of these three types of responses. These can, however, be uniquely distinguished on plots of root:shoot ratios against total biomass through time. We used this approach to separate ontogenetic, plastic, and growth-limiting responses of wild rice (Zizania palustris L.) to changes in nitrogen, phosphorus, and light availabilities. Relative growth rate was limited primarily by nitrogen but responded to increased light and phosphorus after nitrogen limitations were alleviated. Nitrogen addition increased relative growth rate because it simultaneously increased unit leaf rate, specific leaf area, and leaf weight ratio. Increased light did not change relative growth rate because decreased specific leaf area and leaf weight ratio compensated the increased unit leaf rate. Phosphorus did not change either relative growth rate or its underlying components. Plants responded ontogenetically to increased nitrogen and light availabilities by accelerating their developmental rate, and plastically by decreasing or increasing their root:shoot ratios, respectively. Plants did not respond either ontogenetically or plastically to increased phosphorus availability. Ontogenetic changes in growth can be separated from plastic and growth-limiting responses by plotting root:shoot ratio against total biomass in the context of the eight possible responses identified above, and also by examining how the underlying components of relative growth rate respond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken SG, Lee PF, Punter D, Stewart JM (1988) Wild rice in Canada. Agriculture Canada, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibold OW, Good AG, Sutherland JM (1989) Annual variation in wild rice (Zizania palustris L.) growth and potential yield in Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Sci 69:653–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants—an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:363–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III (1980) The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:233–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clay SA, Oelke EA (1987) Effects of giant burreed (Spaganium eurycarpum) and shade on wild rice (Zizania palustris). Weed Sci 35:640–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Day WR, Lee PF (1989) Ecological relationships of wild rice, Zizania aquatica. 8. Classification of sediments. Can J Bot 67:1381–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans GC (1972) The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gedroc JJ, McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS (1996) Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? Funct Ecol 10:44–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grava J, Raisanen KA (1978) Growth and nutrient accumulation and distribution in wild rice. Agron J 70:1077–1081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon ME, Lajtha K (1999) Analysis of detritus and organic horizons for mineral and organic constituents. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P (eds) Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 148–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R (1990) Basic growth analysis. Unwin Hyman, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keenan TJ, Lee PF (1988) Ecological relationships of wild rice, Zizania aquatica. 7. Sediment nutrient depletion following introduction of wild rice to a shallow boreal lake. Can J Bot 66:236–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larcher W (1995) Physiological plant ecology, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS (1998) Can plants track changes in nutrient availability via changes in biomass partitioning? Plant Soil 202:201–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughay KDM, Coleman JS (1999) Biomass allocation in plants: ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients. Ecology 80:2581–2593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meziane D, Shipley B (1999) Interacting components of interspecific relative growth rate: constancy and change under different conditions of light and nutrient supply. Funct Ecol 13:611–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner BG, Sultan SE, Morgan SG, Padilla DK, Relyea RA (2005) Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 20:685–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney HA (1972) The carbon balance of plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 3:315–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oelke EA, Grava J, Noetzel D, Barron B, Percich J, Schertz C, Strait J, Stucker R (1982) Wild rice production in Minnesota. University of Minnesota Extension Bulletin 464, St. Paul, MN

  • Poorter H, Nagel O (2000) The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Aust J Plant Physiol 27:595–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio G, Zhu J, Lynch JP (2003) A critical test of the two prevailing theories of plant response to nutrient availabilities. Am J Bot 90:143–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryser P, Eek L (2000) Consequences of phenotypic plasticity vs. interspecific differences in leaf and root traits for acquisition of aboveground and belowground resources. Am J Bot 87:402–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley B, Meziane M (2002) The balanced-growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Funct Ecol 16:326–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taub DR (2002) Analysis of interspecific variation in plant growth responses to nitrogen. Can J Bot 80:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1988) Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer VR, Stone EL (1978) Comparative foliar analysis of young balsam fir fertilized with nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and lime. Soil Sci Soc Am J 42:125–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RD, Pastor J, Dewey BW (2010) Litter quantity and nitrogen immobilization cause oscillations in productivity of wild rice (Zizania palustris L.) in Northern Minnesota. Ecosystems 13:485–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (2004) Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6(4):207–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir CE, Dale HM (1960) A developmental study of wild rice, Zizania aquatica L. Can J Bot 38:719–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB (1988) A review of evidence on the control of shoot:root ratio, in relation to models. Ann Bot 61:433–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Zhang Z, Yang F, Wang X (2004) Studies on leaf photosynthetic temperature characteristics of wild rice. J Jilin Agric Univ 26:488–490

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Ecosystems Ecology Program. We are grateful to the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, especially Nancy Schuldt and Tom House, for their assistance, support, and supply of sediment for this project. We thank two anonymous reviews for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Pastor.

Additional information

Communicated by Kouki Hikosaka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sims, L., Pastor, J., Lee, T. et al. Nitrogen, phosphorus and light effects on growth and allocation of biomass and nutrients in wild rice. Oecologia 170, 65–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2296-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2296-x

Keywords

Navigation