Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

High red deer density depresses body mass of roe deer fawns

  • Population ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many previous studies have pointed out that, when resources are limited, the potential for competition should be high among sympatric species that display overlaps in habitat and nutritional niches. However, reliable evidence of competition between red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) has not been yet reported for life history traits directly measuring performance such as body mass, reproduction, or survival. From long-term monitoring of deer populations in the reserve of La Petite Pierre (France), we measured the sex-specific responses of roe deer fawn body mass to changes in red deer density after accounting for possible confounding effects of date of shooting, climatic conditions, and roe deer density. As expected under the hypothesis of competition, red deer density in a given year had a marked negative influence on body mass of roe deer fawns born the same year and the following year. Fawn mass of roe deer males and females responded in similar ways to changes in red deer density. Our study provides the first evidence of a negative response of roe deer performance to high red deer density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acevedo P, Ruiz-Fons F, Vicente J, Reyes-Garcia AR, Alzaga V, Gortazar C (2008) Estimating red deer abundance in a wide range of management situations in Mediterranean habitats. J Zool 276:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R, Gaillard JM, Liberg O, San Jose C (1998) Variations in life history parameters. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 285–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen R, Gaillard JM, Linnell JDC, Duncan P (2000) Factors affecting maternal care in an income breeder, the European roe deer. J Anim Ecol 69:672–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltzinger C (2003) Sélection des sites de repos par le cerf (Cervus elaphus) et le chevreuil (Capreolus capreolus) en forêt tempérée de moyenne montagne. PhD thesis, Ecole Nationale du Génie Rural, des Eaux et des Forêts, Paris

  • Bartos L, Vankova D, Miller KV, Siler J (2002) Interspecific competition between white-tailed, fallow, red, and roe deer. J Wildl Manage 66:522–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Townsend CR, Harper JL (2006) Ecology from individuals to ecosytems. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonenfant C, Gaillard JM, Loison A, Klein F (2002) Sex- and age-dependent effects of population density on life history traits of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a temperate forest. Ecography 25:446–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonenfant C, Gaillard JM, Coulson T, Festa-Bianchet M, Loison A, Garel M, Loe LE, Blanchard P, Pettorelli N, Owen-Smith N, Du Toit J, Duncan P (2009) Empirical evidence of density-dependence in population of large herbivores. Adv Ecol Res 41:313–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference, a practical information theoretic approach. Springer Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley G (1977) Analysis of vertebrate populations. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE (1988) Reproductive success in male and female red deer. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Reproductive success. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 325–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolman PM, Wäber K (2008) Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer. Wildl Res 35:202–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • du Toit JT, Owen-Smith N (1989) Body size, population metabolism and habitat specialization among African large herbivores. Am Nat 133:736–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti F, Sforzi A, Lovari S (2008) Intolerance amongst deer species at feeding: roe deer are uneasy banqueters. Behav Processes 78:487–491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flerov KK (1952) Fauna of USSR. In: Mammals, vol 1, No 2. New Series 55. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, USSR

  • Focardi S, Aragno P, Montanaro P, Riga F (2006) Inter-specific competition from fallow deer Dama dama reduces habitat quality for the Italian roe deer Capreolus capreolus italicus. Ecography 29:407–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1987) A review of density dependence in population of large mammals. In: Genoway HH (ed) Current mammalogy. Plenum, New York, pp 401–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Jullien JM (1993) Effects of cohort, sex, and birth date on body development of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) fawns. Oecologia 94:57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Delorme D, Boutin JM, van Laere G, Boisaubert B (1996) Body mass of roe deer fawns during winter in 2 contrasting populations. J Wildl Manage 60:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Boutin JM, Delorme D, van Laere G, Duncan P, Lebreton JD (1997) Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations. Oecologia 112:502–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Liberg O, Andersen R, Hewison AMJ (1998) Population dynamics of roe deer. In: Andersen R, Duncan P, Linnell JDC (eds) The European roe deer: the biology of success. Scandinavian University Press, Oslo, pp 309–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JM, Duncan P, Delorme D, van Laere G, Pettorelli N, Maillard D, Renaud G (2003) Effects of hurricane Lothar on the population dynamics of European roe deer. J Wildl Manage 67:767–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garel M, Loison A, Gaillard JM, Cugnasse JM, Maillard D (2004) The effects of a severe drought on mouflon lamb survival. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 271:471–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garel M, Bonenfant C, Hamann JL, Klein F, Gaillard JM (2010) Are abundance indices derived from spotlight counts reliable to monitor red deer populations? Wildl Biol 16(1) (in press)

  • Gill RMA (1990) Monitoring the status of European and North American cervids, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Hamann JL, Klein F, Saint-Andrieux C (1997) Domaine vital diurne et déplacements des biches (Cervus elaphus) sur le secteur de la Petite Pierre (Bas Rhin). Gibier Faune Sauvage 14:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemami MR, Watkinson AR, Dolman PM (2004) Habitat selection by sympatric muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland commercial pine forest. For Ecol Manage 194:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewison AJM, Gaillard JM, Angibault JM, van Laere G, Vincent JP (2002) The influence of density on post-weaning growth in roe deer Capreolus capreolus fawns. J Zool 257:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann RR (1989) Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarman PJ (1974) Social organization of antelope in relation to their ecology. Behaviour 48:215–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BK, Kern JW, Wisdom MJ, Findholt SL, Kie JG (2000) Resource selection and spatial separation of mule deer and elk during spring. J Wildl Manage 64:685–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjellander P, Gaillard JM, Hewison AJM (2006) Density-dependent responses of fawn cohort body mass in two contrasting roe deer populations. Oecologia 146:521–530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latham J (1999) Interspecific interactions of ungulates in European forests: an overview. For Ecol Manage 120:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham J, Staines BW, Gorman ML (1997) Correlations of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer densities in Scottish forests with environmental variables. J Zool 242:681–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham J, Staines BW, Gorman ML (1999) Comparative feeding ecology of red (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Scottish plantation forests. J Zool 247:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshal JP, Bleich VC, Andrew NG (2008) Evidence for interspecific competition between feral ass Equus asinus and mountain sheep Ovis canadensis in a desert environment. Wildl Biol 14:228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner JM, Pemberton JM, Brotherstone S, Albon SD (2000) Estimating variance components and heritabilities in the wild: a case study using the “animal model” approach. J Evol Biol 13:804–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morellet N, Gaillard JM, Hewison AJM, Ballon P, Boscardin Y, Duncan P, Klein F, Maillard D (2007) Indicators of ecological change: new tools for managing populations of large herbivores. J Appl Ecol 44:634–643

    Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Ostbye E (2006) Effect of climate and density on individual and population growth of roe deer Capreolus capreolus at northern latitudes: the Lier valley, Norway. Wildl Biol 12:321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud A, Perez-Barberia FJ, Gordon IJ (2001) The effect of season, sex and feeding style on home range area versus body mass scaling in temperate ruminants. Oecologia 127:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith N (2002) Adaptative herbivore ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Barberia FJ, Perez-Fernandez E, Robertson E, Alvarez-Enriquez B (2008) Does the Jarman-Bell principle at intra-specific level explain sexual segregation in polygynous ungulates? Sex differences in forage digestibility in Soay sheep. Oecologia 157:21–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Duncan P, Ouellet JP, van Laere G (2001) Population density and small-scale variation in habitat quality affect phenotypic quality in roe deer. Oecologia 128:400–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, van Laere G, Duncan P, Kjellander P, Liberg O, Delorme D, Maillard D (2002) Variations in adult body mass in roe deer: the effects of population density at birth and of habitat quality. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 269:747–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, Gaillard JM, Duncan P, Maillard D, van Laere G, Delorme D (2003) Age and density modify the effects of habitat quality on survival and movements of roe deer. Ecology 84:3307–3316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettorelli N, et al. (2006) Using a proxy of plant productivity (NDVI) to find key periods for animal performance: the case of roe deer. Oikos 112:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portier C, Festa-Bianchet M, Gaillard JM, Jorgenson JT, Yoccoz NG (1998) Effects of density and weather on survival of bighorn sheep lambs (Ovis canadensis). J Zool 245:271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putman R (1996) Competition and resources partitioning in temperate ungulate assemblies. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Staines BW, Welch D (1984) Habitat selection and impact of red (Cervus elaphus L.) and roe (Capreolus capreolus L.) deer in a Sitka spruce plantation. Proc R Soc Edin Sec B 82:303–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Storms D, Said S, Fritz H, Hamann JL, Saint-Andrieux C, Klein F (2006) Influence of hurricane Lothar on red and roe deer winter diets in the Northern Vosges, France. For Ecol Manage 237:164–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storms D, et al. (2008) Seasonal variation in diet composition and similarity of sympatric red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus. Wildl Biol 14:237–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://R-projectorg

  • Therrien JF, Côté SD, Festa-Bianchet M, Ouellet JP (2007) Conservative maternal care in an iteroparous mammal: a resource allocation experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toïgo C, Gaillard JM, van Laere G, Hewison M, Morellet N (2006) How does environmental variation influence body mass, body size, and body condition? Roe deer as a case study. Ecography 29:301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wal R, Van Wijnen H, Van Wieren S, Beucher O, Bos D (2000) On facilitation between herbivores: how brent geese profit from brown hares. Ecology 81:969–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Soest PJ (1996) Allometry and ecology of feeding behavior and digestive capacity in herbivores: a review. Zoo Biol 15:455–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch D, Staines BW, Catt DC, Scott D (1990) Habitat usage by red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer in a Scottish Sitka spruce plantation. J Zool 221:453–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer O, Said S, Miroir J, Duncan P, Gaillard JM, Klein F (2004) The effects of hurricane Lothar on habitat use of roe deer. For Ecol Manage 195:237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by the Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage (ONCFS). The national reserve is managed by the ONCFS and the Office National des Forêts. We are grateful to wildlife technicians, foresters and many volunteers for help in counts. We are also grateful to hunters for having taken measurements on roe deer fawns. We thank Christophe Bonenfant, Mathieu Garel, and the members of the GROS research group for stimulating discussions. Finally, we thank Atle Mysterud and one anonymous reviewer for their comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Michel Gaillard.

Additional information

Communicated by Jörg Ganzhorn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richard, E., Gaillard, JM., Saïd, S. et al. High red deer density depresses body mass of roe deer fawns. Oecologia 163, 91–97 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1538-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1538-z

Keywords

Navigation