Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-lethal effects of an invasive species in the marine environment: the importance of early life-history stages

  • Conservation Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies examining the effects of invasive species have focussed traditionally on the direct/lethal effects of the invasive on the native community but there is a growing recognition that invasive species may also have non-lethal effects. In terrestrial systems, non-lethal effects of invasive species can disrupt early life-history phases (such as fertilisation, dispersal and subsequent establishment) of native species, but in the marine environment most studies focus on adult rather than early life-history stages. Here, we examine the potential for an introduced sessile marine invertebrate (Styela plicata) to exert both lethal and non-lethal effects on a native species (Microcosmus squamiger) across multiple early life-history stages. We determined whether sperm from the invasive species interfered with the fertilisation of eggs from the native species and found no effect. However, we did find strong effects of the invasive species on the post-fertilisation performance of the native species. The invasive species inhibited the settlement of native larvae and, in the field, the presence of the invasive species was associated with a ten-fold increase in the post-settlement mortality of the native species, as well as an initial reduction of growth in the native. Our results suggest that larvae of the native species avoid settling near the invasive species due to reduced post-settlement survival in its presence. Overall, we found that invasive species can have complex and pervasive effects (both lethal and non-lethal) across the early life-history stages of the native species, which are likely to result in its displacement and to facilitate further invasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almany GR (2003) Priority effects in coral reef fish communities. Ecology 84:1920–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman S, Whitlatch RB (2007) Effects of small-scale disturbance on invasion success in marine communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bando KJ (2006) The roles of competition and disturbance in a marine invasion. Biol Invasions 8:755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes AL, Totland O, Hegland SJ, Nielsen A (2007) Do alien plant invasions really affect pollination success in native plant species? Biol Conserv 138:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard SG, Whitlatch RB, Osman RW (2004) Checking the landing zone: do invertebrate larvae avoid settling near superior spatial competitors? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 280:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard SG, Sedlack B, Reinhardt JF, Litty C, Gareau K, Whitlatch RB (2007) Fragmentation of colonial ascidians: differences in reattachment capability among species. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:166–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butman CA, Grassle JP, Webb CM (1988) Substrate choices made by marine larvae settling in still water and in a flume flow. Nature 333:771–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE, Goldwasser L (2001) Exposing the mechanism and timing of impact of nonindigenous species on native species. Ecology 82:1330–1343

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd J, Lambert CC (2000) Mechanism of the block to hybridisation and selfing between the sympatric ascidians Ciona intestinalis and Ciona savignyi. Mol Reprod Dev 55:109–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton JT (1999) The scale and ecological consequences of biological invasions in the world’s oceans. In: Sandlund OT (ed) Invasive species and biodiversity management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian CE (2001) Consequences of a biological invasion reveal the importance of mutualism for plant communities. Nature 413:635–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AN, Carlton JT (1998) Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary. Science 279:555–557

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AR, Butler AJ, van Altena I (1991) Settlement behaviour of ascidian larvae: preliminary evidence for inhibition by sponge allelochemicals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 72:117–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edlund AF, Koehl MAR (1998) Adhesion and reattachment of compound ascidians to various substrata: weak glue can prevent tissue damage. J Exp Biol 201:2397–2402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elkin C, Marshall DJ (2007) Desperate larvae: influence of deferred costs and habitat requirements on habitat selection. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 335:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueredo CC, Giani A, Bird DF (2007) Does allelopathy contribute to Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii (Cyanobacteria) bloom occurrence and geographic expansion? J Phycol 43:256–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galil BS (2007) Loss or gain? invasive aliens and biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 55:314–322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin LA, Qian PY (1997) Juvenile mortality in benthic marine invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 146:265–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribben PE, Wright JT (2006) Sublethal effects on reproduction in native fauna: are females more vulnerable to biological invasion? Oecologia 149:352–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grosberg RK (1981) Competitive ability influences habitat choice in marine invertebrates. Nature 290:700–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz E (2002) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:22–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper FM, Hart MW (2005) Gamete compatibility and sperm competition affect paternity and hybridization between sympatric Asterias sea stars. Biol Bull 209:113–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt CL (2002) Distribution and biodiversity of Australian tropical marine bioinvasions. Pac Sci 56:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollebone AL, Hay ME (2007) Propagule pressure of an invasive crab overwhelms native biotic resistance. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 342:191–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kott P (1985) The Australian Ascidiacea, Part 1. Phlebobranchia and Stolidobranchia. Mem Queensl Mus 23:1–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurle CM, Croll DA, Tershy BR (2008) Introduced rats indirectly change marine rocky intertidal communities from algae- to invertebrate-dominated. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:3800–3804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert C (2000) Germ-cell warfare in ascidians: sperm from one species can interfere with the fertilisation of a second species. Biol Bull 198:22–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert CC (2001) Fertilization-induced glycosidase release and interspecific sperm competition in ascidians. In: Sawada H, Yokosawa H, Lambert CC (eds) The biology of ascidians. Springer, Tokyo, pp 24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert G (2007) Invasive sea squirts: a growing global problem. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:3–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitan DR (1995) The ecology of fertilization in free-spawning invertebrates. In: McEdward L (ed) Ecology of marine invertebrate larvae. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 123–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitan DR, Petersen C (1995) Sperm limitation in the sea. Trends Ecol Evol 10:228–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack MC, D’Antonio CM (1998) Impacts of biological invasions on disturbance regimes. Trends Ecol Evol 13:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack RP, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz FA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado M, Young CM (1999) Effects of the duration of larval life on post-larval stages of the demosponge Sigmadocia caerulea. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 232:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DJ, Styan CA, Keough MJ (2000) Intraspecific co-variation between egg and body size affects fertilisation kinetics of free-spawning marine invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 195:305–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DJ, Bolton TF, Keough MJ (2003a) Offspring size affects the post-metamorphic performance of a colonial marine invertebrate. Ecology 84:3131–3137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall DJ, Pechenik JA, Keough MJ (2003b) Larval activity levels and delayed metamorphosis affect post-larval performance in the colonial ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 246:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JJ, Byers JE (2005) As good as dead? Sublethal predation facilitates lethal predation on an intertidal clam. Ecol Lett 8:160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan S (1995) Life and death in the plankton: larval mortality and adaptation. In: McEdward L (ed) Ecology of marine invertebrate larvae. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 279–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Nystrom P, Svensson O, Lardner B, Bronmark C, Graneli W (2001) The influence of multiple introduced predators on a littoral pond community. Ecology 82:1023–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (1995) The influence of resident adults on recruitment: a comparison to settlement. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 190:169–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pangle KL, Peacor SD (2006) Non-lethal effect of the invasive predator Bythotrephes longimanus on Daphnia mendotae. Freshwater Biol 51:1070–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pechenik JA (2006) Larval experience and latent effects—metamorphosis is not a new beginning. Integr Comp Biol 46:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazzi L, Ceccherelli G (2002) Effects of competition between two introduced Caulerpa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 225:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reusch TBH, Williams SL (1999) Macrophyte canopy structure and the success of an invasive marine bivalve. Oikos 84:398–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rius M, Pascual M, Turon X (2008) Phylogeography of the widespread marine invader Microcosmus squamiger (Ascidiacea) reveals high genetic diversity of introduced populations and non-independent colonizations. Divers Distrib 14:818–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GM, Carlton JT, Grosholz ED, Hines AH (1997) Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. Am Zool 37:621–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GM, Fofonoff P, Hines AH, Grosholz ED (1999) Non-indigenous species as stressors in estuarine and marine communities: assessing invasion impacts and interactions. Limnol Oceanogr 44:950–972

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenk HJ (2006) Root competition: beyond resource depletion. J Ecol 94:725–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder WE, Evans EW (2006) Ecological effects of invasive arthropod generalist predators. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 37:95–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowicz JJ, Fried H, Osman RW, Whitlatch RB (2002) Biodiversity, invasion resistance, and marine ecosystem function: reconciling pattern and process. Ecology 83:2575–2590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoner DS (1994) Larvae of a colonial ascidian use a non-contact mode of substratum selection on a coral reef. Mar Biol 121:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL, Eviner VT, Jeschke JM, Pace ML (2006) Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 21:645–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2002) Field evidence of trait-mediated indirect interactions in a rocky intertidal food web. Ecol Lett 5:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2003) Trait-mediated effects in rocky intertidal food chains: predator risk cues alter prey feeding rates. Ecology 84:629–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD, Silliman BR (2004) Trophic cascades in rocky shore tide pools: distinguishing lethal and nonlethal effects. Oecologia 139:427–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2006) Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 9:1245–1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Keough MJ (2001) Supply-side ecology: the nature and consequences of variations in recruitment of intertidal organisms. In: Bertness MD, Gaines SD, Hay ME (eds) Marine community ecology. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 183–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Veen T, Borge T, Griffith SC, Saetre G-P, Bures S, Gustafsson L, Sheldon BC (2001) Hybridization and adaptive mate choice in flycatchers. Nature 411:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt DE (1998) Effect of larval swimming duration on growth and reproduction of Bugula neritina (Bryozoa) under field conditions. Biol Bull 195:126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek SK, Todd CD (1997) Inhibition and facilitation of bryozoan and ascidian settlement by natural multi-species biofilms: effects of film age and the roles of active and passive larval attachment. Mar Biol 128:463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wonham MJ, Walton WC, Ruiz GM, Frese AN, Galil BS (2001) Going to the source: role of the invasion pathway in determining potential invaders. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 215:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt ASJ, Hewitt CL, Walker DI, Ward TJ (2005) Marine introductions in the Shark Bay World Heritage Property, Western Australia: a preliminary assessment. Divers Distrib 11:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young CM, Svane I (1989) The ecology and behaviour of ascidian larvae. Oceangr Mar Biol Annu Rev 27:45–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Yund PO (2000) How severe is sperm limitation in natural populations of marine free-spawners? Trends Ecol Evol 15:10–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to B. Galletly and A. Crean for assistance in the field. M.R. was supported by a travel grant from the Spanish “Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia” during his stay at the University of Queensland. This project was funded by projects DPO666147 of the Australian Research Council, and CTM2007-66635 and PIE 200730I026 of the Spanish Government. This work was carried out in accordance with the laws of Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Rius.

Additional information

Communicated by Geoffrey C. Trussell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rius, M., Turon, X. & Marshall, D.J. Non-lethal effects of an invasive species in the marine environment: the importance of early life-history stages. Oecologia 159, 873–882 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1256-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1256-y

Keywords

Navigation