Abstract
Response inhibition processes are one of the most important executive control functions and have been subject to intense research in cognitive neuroscience. However, knowledge on the neurophysiology and functional neuroanatomy on response inhibition is biased because studies usually employ experimental paradigms (e.g., sustained attention to response task, SART) in which behavior is susceptible to impulsive errors. Here, we investigate whether there are differences in neurophysiological mechanisms and networks depending on the response mode that predominates behavior in a response inhibition task. We do so comparing a SART with a traditionally formatted task paradigm. We use EEG-beamforming in two tasks inducing opposite response modes during action selection. We focus on theta frequency modulations, since these are implicated in cognitive control processes. The results show that a response mode that is susceptible to impulsive errors (response mode used in the SART) is associated with stronger theta band activity in the left temporo-parietal junction. The results suggest that the response modes applied during response inhibition differ in the encoding of surprise signals, or related processes of attentional sampling. Response modes during response inhibition seem to differ in processes necessary to update task representations relevant to behavioral control.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron AR, Robbins TW, Poldrack RA (2014) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on. Trends Cogn Sci 18:177–185. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.003
Band GP, van Boxtel GJ (1999) Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms. Acta Psychol (Amst) 101:179–211
Bari A, Robbins TW (2013) Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control. Prog Neurobiol 108:44–79. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005
Beste C, Domschke K, Kolev V et al (2010a) Functional 5-HT1a receptor polymorphism selectively modulates error-specific subprocesses of performance monitoring. Hum Brain Mapp 31:621–630. doi:10.1002/hbm.20892
Beste C, Willemssen R, Saft C, Falkenstein M (2010b) Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: basal ganglia disease effects. Neuropsychologia 48:366–373. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.023
Beste C, Ness V, Falkenstein M, Saft C (2011) On the role of fronto-striatal neural synchronization processes for response inhibition—evidence from ERP phase-synchronization analyses in pre-manifest Huntington’s disease gene mutation carriers. Neuropsychologia 49:3484–3493. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.08.024
Beste C, Ness V, Lukas C et al (2012) Mechanisms mediating parallel action monitoring in fronto-striatal circuits. Neuroimage 62:137–146. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.019
Bressler SL, Richter CG (2014) Interareal oscillatory synchronization in top-down neocortical processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 31C:62–66. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.08.010
Busch NA, VanRullen R (2010) Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:16048–16053. doi:10.1073/pnas.1004801107
Carter L, Russell PN, Helton WS (2013) Target predictability, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain Cogn 82:35–42. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.002
Cavanagh JF, Frank MJ (2014) Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends Cogn Sci 18:414–421. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
Cavanagh JF, Zambrano-Vazquez L, Allen JJB (2012) Theta lingua franca: a common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. Psychophysiology 49:220–238. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01293.x
Chmielewski WX, Mückschel M, Dippel G, Beste C (2015) Concurrent information affects response inhibition processes via the modulation of theta oscillations in cognitive control networks. Brain Struct Funct. doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1137-1
Cohen MX (2014) A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling. Trends Neurosci 37:480–490. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.06.004
Cohen MX, Donner TH (2013) Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. J Neurophysiol 110:2752–2763. doi:10.1152/jn.00479.2013
De Blasio FM, Barry RJ (2013) Prestimulus delta and theta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task. Int J Psychophysiol 87:279–288. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.016
Diamond A (2013) Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 64:135–168. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
Dockree PM, Kelly SP, Roche RAP et al (2004) Behavioural and physiological impairments of sustained attention after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 20:403–414. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.019
Dockree PM, Bellgrove MA, O’Keeffe FM et al (2006) Sustained attention in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and healthy controls: enhanced sensitivity with dual-task load. Exp Brain Res 168:218–229. doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0079-x
Falkenstein M, Hoormann J, Hohnsbein J (1999) ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol (Amst) 101:267–291
Fallgatter AJ (2001) Electrophysiology of the prefrontal cortex in healthy control and schizophrenic patients: a review. J Neural Transm 108:679–694
Fassbender C, Hester R, Murphy K et al (2009) Prefrontal and midline interactions mediating behavioural control. Eur J Neurosci 29:181–187. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06557.x
Fiebelkorn IC, Snyder AC, Mercier MR et al (2013) Cortical cross-frequency coupling predicts perceptual outcomes. Neuroimage 69:126–137. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.021
Geng JJ, Vossel S (2013) Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: contextual updating? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:2608–2620. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.010
Gross J, Kujala J, Hamalainen M et al (2001) Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: studying neural interactions in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:694–699. doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.694
Harper J, Malone SM, Bernat EM (2014) Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a Go/Nogo task. Clin Neurophysiol 125:124–132. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.025
Helton WS (2009) Impulsive responding and the sustained attention to response task. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31:39–47. doi:10.1080/13803390801978856
Helton WS, Hollander TD, Warm JS et al (2005) Signal regularity and the mindlessness model of vigilance. Br J Psychol Lond Engl 1953 96:249–261. doi:10.1348/000712605X38369
Herrmann CS, Knight RT (2001) Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:465–476
Huster RJ, Enriquez-Geppert S, Lavallee CF et al (2013) Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. Int J Psychophysiol 87:217–233. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.08.001
Kenemans JL, Bekker EM, Lijffijt M, Overtoom CC, Jonkman LM, Verbaten MN (2005) Attention deficit and impulsivity: selectin, shifting, and stopping. Int J Psychophysiol 58:59–70
Landau AN, Fries P (2012) Attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Curr Biol CB 22:1000–1004. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.054
McVay JC, Kane MJ (2009) Conducting the train of thought: working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35:196–204. doi:10.1037/a0014104
Mückschel M, Stock A-K, Beste C (2014) Psychophysiological mechanisms of interindividual differences in goal activation modes during action cascading. Cereb Cortex N Y N 1994 24:2120–2129. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht066
Mückschel M, Stock AK, Dippel G, Chmielewski WX, Beste C (2016) Interacting sources of interference during sensorimotor integration processes. Neuroimage 125:342–349
Nunez PL, Pilgreen KL (1991) The spline-Laplacian in clinical neurophysiology: a method to improve EEG spatial resolution. J Clin Neurophysiol 8:397–413
O’Connell RG, Dockree PM, Bellgrove MA et al (2007) The role of cingulate cortex in the detection of errors with and without awareness: a high-density electrical mapping study. Eur J Neurosci 25:2571–2579. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05477.x
Ocklenburg S, Güntürkün O, Beste C (2011) Lateralized neural mechanisms underlying the modulation of response inhibition processes. Neuroimage 55:1771–1778. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.035
Oostenveld R, Stegeman DF, Praamstra P, van Oosterom A (2003) Brain symmetry and topographic analysis of lateralized event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 114:1194–1202
Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen J-M (2011) FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:1–9. doi:10.1155/2011/156869
Quetscher C, Yildiz A, Dharmadhikari S et al (2014) Striatal GABA-MRS predicts response inhibition performance and its cortical electrophysiological correlates. Brain Struct Funct. doi:10.1007/s00429-014-0873-y
Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J et al (1997) “Oops!”: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 35:747–758
Roche RAP, Garavan H, Foxe JJ, O’Mara SM (2005) Individual differences discriminate event-related potentials but not performance during response inhibition. Exp Brain Res 160:60–70. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1985-z
Rondi-Reig L, Paradis A-L, Lefort JM et al (2014) How the cerebellum may monitor sensory information for spatial representation. Front Syst Neurosci 8:205. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00205
Staub B, Doignon-Camus N, Bacon E, Bonnefond A (2014) Investigating sustained attention ability in the elderly by using two different approaches: inhibiting ongoing behavior versus responding on rare occasions. Acta Psychol (Amst) 146:51–57. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.003
Stevenson H, Russell PN, Helton WS (2011) Search asymmetry, sustained attention, and response inhibition. Brain Cogn 77:215–222. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.08.007
Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O, Delpuech C, Permier J (1997) Oscillatory gamma-band (30–70 Hz) activity induced by a visual search task in humans. J Neurosci 17:722–734
Vanrullen R, Dubois J (2011) The psychophysics of brain rhythms. Front Psychol 2:203. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00203
VanRullen R, Carlson T, Cavanagh P (2007) The blinking spotlight of attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19204–19209. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707316104
Vossel S, Geng JJ, Fink GR (2014) Dorsal and ventral attention systems: distinct neural circuits but collaborative roles. Neurosci Rev J Bring Neurobiol Neurol Psychiatry 20:150–159. doi:10.1177/1073858413494269
Womelsdorf T, Vinck M, Leung LS, Everling S (2010) Selective theta-synchronization of choice-relevant information subserves goal-directed behavior. Front Hum Neurosci 4:210. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00210
Yordanova J, Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Kolev V (2004) Parallel systems of error processing in the brain. Neuroimage 22:590–602. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.040
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a Grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BE4045/10-2 to CB.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dippel, G., Chmielewski, W., Mückschel, M. et al. Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study. Brain Struct Funct 221, 4091–4101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1148-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1148-y