Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Graph-guided joint prediction of class label and clinical scores for the Alzheimer’s disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Brain Structure and Function Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and its prodromal stage, i.e., mild cognitive impairment, is very important for early treatment. Over the last decade, various machine learning methods have been proposed to predict disease status and clinical scores from brain images. It is worth noting that many features extracted from brain images are correlated significantly. In this case, feature selection combined with the additional correlation information among features can effectively improve classification/regression performance. Typically, the correlation information among features can be modeled by the connectivity of an undirected graph, where each node represents one feature and each edge indicates that the two involved features are correlated significantly. In this paper, we propose a new graph-guided multi-task learning method incorporating this undirected graph information to predict multiple response variables (i.e., class label and clinical scores) jointly. Specifically, based on the sparse undirected feature graph, we utilize a new latent group Lasso penalty to encourage the correlated features to be selected together. Furthermore, this new penalty also encourages the intrinsic correlated tasks to share a common feature subset. To validate our method, we have performed many numerical studies using simulated datasets and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative dataset. Compared with the other methods, our proposed method has very promising performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bain LJ, Jedrziewski K, Morrison-Bogorad M, Albert M, Cotman C, Hendrie H, Trojanowski JQ (2008) Healthy brain aging: a meeting report from the Sylvan M. Cohen annual retreat of the University of Pennsylvania Institute on Aging. Alzheimer’s Dement J Alzheimer’s Assoc 4:443–446

  • Bouwman FH, van der Flier WM, Schoonenboom NS, van Elk EJ, Kok A, Rijmen F, Blankenstein MA, Scheltens P (2007) Longitudinal changes of csf biomarkers in memory clinic patients. Neurology 69(10):1006–1011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brookmeyer R, Johnson E, Ziegler-Graham K, Arrighi HM (2007) Forecasting the global burden of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement 3:186–191

  • Cai T, Liu W, Luo X (2011) A constrained \(l_{1}\) minimization approach to sparse precision matrix estimation. J Am Stat Assoc 106(494):594–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng B, Zhang D, Chen S, Kaufer DI, Shen D (2013) Semi-supervised multimodal relevance vector regression improves cognitive performance estimation from imaging and biological biomarkers. Neuroinformatics 11(3):339–353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Santi S, de Leon MJ, Rusinek H, Convit A, Tarshish CY, Roche A, Tsui WH, Kandil E, Boppana M, Daisley K et al (2001) Hippocampal formation glucose metabolism and volume losses in MCI and AD. Neurobiol Aging 22(4):529–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Du AT, Schuff N, Kramer JH, Rosen HJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Rankin K, Miller BL, Weiner MW (2007) Different regional patterns of cortical thinning in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Brain 130:1159–1166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne S, Caroli A, Geroldi C, Frisoni GB, Collins DL (2005) Predicting clinical variable from MRI features: application to MMSE in MCI. In: Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention—MICCAI 2005, Springer, pp 392–399

  • Fan Y, Kaufer D, Shen D (2010) Joint estimation of multiple clinical variables of neurological diseases from imaging patterns. In: 2010 IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, IEEE, pp 852–855

  • Fjell AM, Walhovd KB, Fennema-Notestine C, McEvoy LK, Hagler DJ, Holland D, Brewer JB, Dale AM (2010) CSF biomarkers in prediction of cerebral and clinical change in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 30:2088–2101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198

  • Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2008) Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 9:432–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hampson M, Peterson BS, Skudlarski P, Gatenby JC, Gore JC (2002) Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images. Hum Brain Mapp 15(4):247–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He X, Niyogi P (2004) Locality preserving projections. In: Thrun S, Saul LK (eds) Neural information processing systems, vol 16. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 153

  • Hebert LE, Beckett LA, Scherr PA, Evans DA (2001) Annual incidence of Alzheimer disease in the United States projected to the years 2000 through 2050. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 15:169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jack C, Petersen RC, Xu YC, O’Brien PC, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, Boeve BF, Waring SC, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E (1999) Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment. Neurology 52(7):1397–1397

  • Kabani N, MacDonald D, Holmes C, Evans A (1998) A 3d atlas of the human brain. NeuroImage 7:S717

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Lee DS, Kang H, Kim BN, Chung MK (2011) Sparse brain network recovery under compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 30(5):1154–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy LK, Fennema-Notestine C, Roddey JC Jr, DJH, Holland D, Karow DS, Pung CJ, Brewer JB, Dale AM (2009) Alzheimer disease: quantitative structural neuroimaging for detection and prediction of clinical and structural changes in mild cognitive impairment. Radiology 251:195–205

  • Meinshausen N, Bühlmann P (2006) High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the lasso. Ann Stat 34(3):1436–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misra C, Fan Y, Davatzikos C (2009) Baseline and longitudinal patterns of brain atrophy in MCI patients, and their use in prediction of short-term conversion to AD: results from ADNI. Neuroimage 44(4):1415–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, McKeel DW, Price JL, Rubin EH, Berg L (2001) Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 58(3):397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL (1984) A new rating scale for alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 141(11):1356–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryali S, Chen T, Supekar K, Menon V (2012) Estimation of functional connectivity in FMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty. Neuroimage 59(4):3852–3861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shen D, Davatzikos C (2002) Hammer: hierarchical attribute matching mechanism for elastic registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 21(11):1421–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sled JG, Zijdenbos AP, Evans AC (1998) A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17(1):87–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stonnington CM, Chu C, Klöppel S, Jack CR Jr, Ashburner J, Frackowiak RS (2010) Predicting clinical scores from magnetic resonance scans in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 51(4):1405–1413

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B 58(1):267–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Fan Y, Bhatt P, Davatzikos C (2010) High-dimensional pattern regression using machine learning: from medical images to continuous clinical variables. NeuroImage 50(4):1519–1535

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Nie J, Yap PT, Shi F, Guo L, Shen D (2011) Robust deformable-surface-based skull-stripping for large-scale studies. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 6893:635–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Yuan L, Lai YC, Shen X, Wonka P, Ye J (2012) Feature grouping and selection over an undirected graph. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, pp 922–930

  • Yang Y, Zou H (2013) gglasso: group lasso penalized learning using a unified BMD algorithm. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gglasso, r package version 1.1

  • Yu G, Liu Y, Thung KH, Shen D (2014) Multi-task linear programming discriminant analysis for the identification of progressive MCI individuals. PloS One 9(5):e96458

  • Yuan M, Lin Y (2006) Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 68:49–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Shen D (2012) Multi-modal multi-task learning for joint prediction of multiple regression and classification variables in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage 59(2):895–907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S (2001) Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20(1):45–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zou H (2006) The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. J Am Stat Assoc 101(476):1418–1429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH Grants AG041721, EB006733, EB008374, EB009634, NSF DMS-1407241 and NIH/NCI Grant R01 CA-149569. Data collection and sharing for this project was funded by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904. ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: Abbott, AstraZeneca AB, Amorfix, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Bioclinica Inc., Biogen Idec, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai Global Clinical Development, Elan Corporation, Genentech, GE Healthcare, Innogenetics, IXICO, Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy, Johnson and Johnson, Eli Lilly and Co., Medpace, Inc., Merck and Co., Inc., Meso Scale Diagnostic, & LLC, Novartis AG, Pfizer Inc, F. Hoffman-La Roche, Servier, Synarc, Inc., and Takeda Pharmaceuticals, as well as non-profit partners the Alzheimer’s Association and Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation, with participation from the US Food and Drug Administration. Private sector contributions to ADNI are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (http://www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study at the University of California, San Diego. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinggang Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, G., Liu, Y. & Shen, D. Graph-guided joint prediction of class label and clinical scores for the Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Struct Funct 221, 3787–3801 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1132-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-015-1132-6

Keywords

Navigation