Skip to main content
Log in

Intensity of regionally applied tastes in relation to administration method: an investigation based on the “taste strips” test

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To compare various methods to apply regional taste stimuli to the tongue. “Taste strips” are a clinical tool to determine gustatory function. How a patient perceives the chemical environment in the mouth is a result of many factors such as taste bud distribution and interactions between the cranial nerves. To date, there have been few studies describing the different approaches to administer taste strips to maximize taste identification accuracy and intensity. This is a normative value acquisition pilot and single-center study. The investigation involved 30 participants reporting a normal sense of smell and taste (18 women, 12 men, mean age 33 years). The taste test was based on spoon-shaped filter paper strips impregnated with four taste qualities (sweet, sour, salty, and bitter) at concentrations shown to be easily detectable by young healthy subjects. The strips were administered in three methods (held stationary on the tip of the tongue, applied across the tongue, held in the mouth), resulting in a total of 12 trials per participant. Subjects identified the taste from a list of four descriptors, (sweet, sour, salty, bitter) and ranked the intensity on a scale from 0 to 10. Statistical analyses were performed on the accuracy of taste identification and rated intensities. The participants perceived in order of most to least intense: salt, sour, bitter, sweet. Of the four tastes, sour consistently was least accurately identified. Presenting the taste strip inside the closed mouth of the participants produced the least accurate taste identification, whereas moving the taste strip across the tongue led to a significant increase in intensity for the sweet taste. In this study of 30 subjects at the second concentration, optimized accuracy and intensity of taste identification was observed through administration of taste strips laterally across the anterior third of the extended tongue. Further studies are required on more subjects and the additional concentrations prior to determining the ideal taste strip application method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Leopold D (2012) Disorders of taste and smell. Medscape. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/861242-overview. Accessed on 7 June 2013

  2. Bromley Steven (2000) Smell and taste disorders: a primary care approach. Am Fam Physician 61(2):427–436

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hummel T, Basile L, Hüttenbrink K (2012) Smell and taste disorders. National Center for Biotechnology Information. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3341581/. Accessed on 7 June 2013

  4. Heckmann JG, Stössel C (2005) Taste disorders in acute stroke: a prospective observational study on taste disorders in 102 stroke patients. Stroke 36(8):1690–1694 Epub 2005 Jul 7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Landis B, Welge-Luessen A (2009) “Taste strips”—a rapid, lateralized, gustatory bedside identification test based on impregnated filter papers. J Neurol 256:242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mueller C, Kallert S (2003) Quantitative assessment of gustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated “taste strips”. Rhinology 41:2–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Purves D, Augustine GJ, Fitzpatrick D, et al. (Eds.) (2001) Neuroscience. 2nd edition. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates. The Organization of the Taste System. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11018/

  8. Grushka M, Ching V, Epstein J (2006) Burning mouth syndrome. Taste and smell. an update. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 63:278–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Breslin P, Huang L (2006) Human taste: peripheral anatomy, taste transduction, and coding. Taste and smell: an update. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 63:152–190

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dzendolet E, Meiselman HL (1976) Gustatory quality changes as a function of solution concentration. Percept Psychophys 2:29–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Christensen C (1986) Role of saliva in human taste perception. Taste and smell an update. 2006, 63, pp 414–428

  12. Settle R (1986) Diabetes mellitus and the chemical senses. Taste and smell an update. 2006, 63, pp 487–513

  13. Gent J, Goodspeed R, Zagraniski R, Catalanotto F (1987) Taste and smell problems: validation of questions for the clinical history. 60: 27–35

  14. Welge-Lüssen A, Patrick Dörig M, Krone F, Hummel T (2011) A study about the frequency of taste disorders. J Neurol 258:386–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Halpern P (1986) What to control in studies of taste. Taste and smell an update. 2006, 63, pp 126–153

  16. Meiselman H (1971) Effect of presentation procedure on taste intensity functions. Percep Psychophys 10(1):15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the editorial help from Anna Fomitchova, Research Tech of Weill Medical College of Cornell University, and Nicholas Guros, Associate Validation Specialist of Genzyme Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Manzi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manzi, B., Hummel, T. Intensity of regionally applied tastes in relation to administration method: an investigation based on the “taste strips” test. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 271, 411–415 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2748-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2748-x

Keywords

Navigation