Skip to main content
Log in

Use of surfactants to remove water-based inks from plastic film: effect of calcium ion concentration and length of surfactant hydrophobe

  • Original Contribution
  • Published:
Colloid and Polymer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effective plastic film deinking could permit the reuse of recycled polymer to produce clear film, reduce solid waste for landfills, reduce raw material demand for polymer production, and aid process economics. In this study, the deinking of a commercial polyethylene film printed with water-based ink was studied using surfactants in the presence of hardness ions (calcium ions) at various pH levels. The electrostatic properties of ink particles in a washing bath were also investigated. Synthetic anionic surfactant or fatty acid soap in the presence of calcium ions at alkaline pH levels was found to be nearly as effective at deinking as cationic, nonionic, or amphoteric surfactants alone. However, adding calcium ions decreases the deinking effectiveness of cationic, nonionic, and amphoteric surfactants. Increasing the length of the ionic surfactant hydrophobe enhances deinking. Zeta potential measurements showed that water-based ink particles in water reach the point of zero charge (PZC) at a pH of about 3.6, above which ink particles are negatively charged, so cationic surfactant tends to adsorb better on the ink than anionic surfactant above the PZC in the absence of calcium. As the cationic surfactant concentration is varied between 0.005 and 25 mM, the zeta potential of the ink particles reverses from negative to positive owing to adsorption of cationic surfactant. For anionic surfactants, added calcium probably forms a bridge between the negatively charged ink and the negatively charged surfactant head groups, which synergizes adsorption of the surfactant and aids deinking. In contrast, calcium competes for adsorption sites with cationic and nonionic surfactants, which inhibits deinking. All the surfactants studied here disperse ink particles effectively in the washing bath above pH 3 except for the ethoxylated amine surfactant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rader CP, Stockel RF (1995) In: Rader CP, Baldwin SD, Cornell DD, Sadler GD, Stockel RF (eds) Plastic, rubber and paper recycling. ACS Symposium Series 609. American Chemical Society, New York, pp 2–10

  2. Stein RS (1995) In: Rader CP, Baldwin SD, Cornell DD, Sadler GD, Stockel RF (eds) Plastic, rubber and paper recycling. ACS Symposium Series 609. American Chemical Society, New York, pp 27–46

  3. Vandenberg N (1991) BioCycle 32:67

    Google Scholar 

  4. Saba RG, WE Rearson (1995) In: Rader CP, Baldwin SD, Cornell DD, Sadler GD, Stockel RF (eds) Plastic, rubber and paper recycling. ACS Symposium Series 609. American Chemical Society, New York, pp 11–26

  5. Gecol H, Scamehorn JF, Christian SD, Grady BP, Riddell FE (2001) Colloids Surf A 189:55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gecol H, Scamehorn JF, Christian SD, Grady BP, Riddell FE (2002) J Surfactants Deterg 5:363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Walser, HP (1996) In: Brandrup J, Bittner M, Michael W, Gleds M (eds) Recycling and recovery of plastics, Hanser, Cincinnati, OH, p 242

  8. Gecol H, Scamehorn JF, Christian SD, Riddell FE (2003) Colloid Polym Sci 281:1172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Chabot B, Daneault C, Lapointe M, Marchildon L (1993) Prog Pap Recycl 8:21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maust MJ (1993) Tappi J 76:95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerstenberg KW (1994) Int Polym Sci Technol 21:13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JH, Kim HG, Khang GS, Lee HB, Jhon MS (1992) J Colloid Inter Sci 151:563

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Carlsson DJ, Wiles DM (1969) Macromolecules 2:587

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carlsson DJ, Wiles DM (1970) Can J Chem 48:2398

    Google Scholar 

  15. Catoite B, Bouriot P, Demuth O, Baszkin A, Chevrier M (1984) Polymer 25:766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lange RK (1994) Detergents and Cleaners. Hanser, New York, pp 29–41, 142–146

  17. Stellner KL, Scamehorn JF (1989) Langmuir 5:70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson LD (1993) Pulp Pap Can 94:23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Riviello AE (1997) Surfactant behavior in the mechanisms of ink removal from secondary fiber in flotation deinking. Dissertation. University of Oklahoma, pp 42–127

  20. Stellner KL, Scamehorn JF (1989) Langmuir 5:77

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez CH (1997) The thermodynamics and kinetics of precipitation of anionic surfactants and surfactant mixtures. Dissertation. University of Oklahoma, pp 46–79

  22. Rosen MJ (1989) Surfactants and interfacial phenomena, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, pp 5, 8, 122–126

  23. Lange RK (1994) Detergents and cleaners. Hanser, New York, pp 52–71

  24. Riddick TH (1968) Control of colloid stability through zeta potential. Zeta Meter, New York, pp 1–3

  25. Somasundaran P, Healy TW, Fuerstenau DW (1964) J Phys Chem 68:3562

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Adamson AW (1976) Physical chemistry of surfaces. Wiley, New York, pp 31–94

  27. (a) Brooks DE (1973) J Colloid Interface Sci 43:687; (b) Brooks DE (1973) J Colloid Interface Sci 43:700; (c) Brooks DE (1973) J Colloid Interface Sci 43:714

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hunter RJ (1981) Zeta potential in colloid science. Academic, New York, pp 324–325, 334–340

  29. Han KN, Healy TW, Fuerstenau DW (1973) J Colloid Interface Sci 44:407

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mukerjiee P, Mysels KJ (1971) Critical micelle concentration of aqueous surfactant systems. NSRDS-NBS, Washington, DC, p 137

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this work was provided by Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Oklahoma Alliance for Public Policy Research, and NSF grant no. EPS 9720161. In addition, support was received from industry sponsors of the Institute for Applied Surfactant Research: Akzo Nobel Chemicals Inc., Albemarle Corporation, Amway Corporation, Colgate-Palmolive Company, Clorox, Dial Company, Dow Chemical, DowElanco, E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Company, Halliburton Services Corporation, Henkel Corporation, Hunstsman Company, ICI Americas Inc., Kerr-McGee Corporation, Lever Brothers Company, Lubrizol Corporation, Nikko Chemicals Ltd., Phillips Petroleum Corporation, Pilot Chemical Company, Procter & Gamble, Reckitt Benckiser North America, Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Shell Chemical Company, Sun Chemical Company, Unilever Inc., and Witco Corporation. Furthermore, authors thank Dr. Scamehorn, the Asahi Glass Chair in Chemical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma for the financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hatice Gecol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gecol, H., Scamehorn, J.F., Christian, S.D. et al. Use of surfactants to remove water-based inks from plastic film: effect of calcium ion concentration and length of surfactant hydrophobe. Colloid Polym Sci 283, 154–163 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-004-1082-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-004-1082-7

Keywords

Navigation