Skip to main content
Log in

Psychological vulnerability to daily stressors in old age

Results of short-term longitudinal studies

Psychische Vulnerabilität gegenüber alltäglichen Stressoren im Alter

Ergebnisse kurzer Längsschnittstudien

  • Beiträge zum Themenschwerpunkt
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A growing numbers of intensive longitudinal studies examine the short-term variability of behavior in response to daily stressors. Collectively, these studies address the vulnerability for stress-related emotional burden as assessed in terms of the intraindividual association between daily stressors and negative affect (NA). This article provides a brief overview of the relevant research on so-called affective reactivity to daily stressors and focuses on findings on development of age-related stressor reactivity across the adult lifespan. Two theoretical propositions have been put forward. Firstly, it has been postulated that aging should be associated with increased affective reactivity, i.e. it has been assumed that the vulnerability in terms of physiological stress reactivity increases across the adult life span and, thus, a higher stress-induced emotional reactivity should result with increasing age. Secondly, it has been argued that due to the continued development of emotional self-regulation skills, there should be an age-related decrease in stress reactivity and, hence, an increased resilience. Findings on age differences in NA reactivity to daily stressors, however, have been inconsistent. A possible explanation for the inconsistent findings may lie in the fact that the postulated dynamics of increased vulnerability or resilience imply different time-related reactions to stressors. In particular, the activation and effectiveness of emotional self-regulation strategies increase with increasing time intervals from the stressors. This leads to the conclusion that with increasing age the resilience for longer periods of stress and accumulated stress should increase. Results from our own research support this hypothesis, where older adults reacted to multiple stressors in a more adaptive way than younger adults.

Zusammenfassung

Eine wachsende Zahl intensiver Längsschnittstudien zur kurzfristigen Variabilität des alltäglichen Stresserlebens thematisiert die Vulnerabilität für stressinduzierte emotionale Belastungen, die sich in der intraindividuellen Assoziation zwischen Maßen des Stresses und des negativen Affekts (NA) manifestiert. Der Beitrag gibt einen kurzen Überblick über die Forschung zu dieser sog. affektiven Reaktivität auf alltäglichen Stress und behandelt insbesondere Befunde zur Entwicklung der affektiven Stressreaktivität über die Lebensspanne. Postuliert wurden sowohl eine mögliche Zunahme affektiver Reaktivität über die Lebenspanne hinweg – nämlich eine erhöhte Vulnerabilität gegenüber physiologischen Stressreaktionen und dadurch auch stressinduzierten emotionalen Belastungen im hohen Alter – als auch das Gegenteil– eine mit dem Alter abnehmende Stressreaktivität und damit wachsende Resilienz infolge lebenslang fortgeschrittener Entwicklung emotionaler Selbstregulationskompetenzen. Die empirischen Befunde zur Altersunterschieden in der Reaktivität des NA auf alltägliche Stressoren sind inkonsistent. Eine mögliche Erklärung dafür besteht darin, dass die postulierten Dynamiken – erhöhte Vulnerabilität vs. Resilienz – jeweils unterschiedliche zeitliche Erstreckung der Stressreaktionen implizieren: Insbesondere emotionale Selbstregulationsstrategien werden mit zunehmendem zeitlichen Abstand zum Stressor wirksam. Daraus wäre zu folgern, dass mit zunehmendem Lebensalter insbesondere die Resilienz in verlängerten Stressphasen bei mehrtägigen Akkumulationen von Stressoren zunimmt. Befunde eigener Studien belegen diesen Alterseffekt: Ältere können auf multiplen Stress, wie er im Alltag sehr häufig auftritt, gelassener reagieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almeida DM (2005) Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 14(2):64–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Almeida DM, Piazza JR, Stawski RS (2009) Interindividual differences and intraindividual variability in the cortisol awakening response: an examination of age and gender. Psychol Aging 24(4):819–827

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Almeida DM, Wethington E, Kessler RC (2002) The Daily Inventory of Stressful Experiences (DISE): an interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment 9(1):41–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bolger N, Schilling EA (1991) Personality and the problems of everyday life: the role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. J Pers 59(3):355–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bolger N, Zuckerman A (1995) A framework for studying personality in the stress process. J Pers Soc Psychol 69(5):890–902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolger N, DeLongis A, Kessler RC, Schilling EA (1989) Effects of daily stress on negative mood. J Pers Soc Psychol 57(5):808–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bonanno GA, Westphal M, Mancini AD (2011) Resilience to loss and potential trauma. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 7:511–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carstensen LL, Fung HH, Charles ST (2003) Socioemotional Selectivity Theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motiv Emot 27(2):103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charles ST (2010) Strength and vulnerability integration: a model of emotional well-being across adulthood. Psychol Bull 136(6):1068–1091

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Charles ST, Piazza JR, Mogle J, Sliwinski MJ, Almeida DM (2013) The wear and tear of daily stressors on mental health. Psychol Sci 24(5):733–741

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Charles ST, Reynolds CA, Gatz M (2001) Age-related differences and change in positive and negative affect over 23 years. J Pers Soc Psychol 80(1):136–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Conway CC, Slavich GM, Hammen C (2014) Dysfunctional attitudes and affective responses to daily stressors: separating cognitive, genetic, and clinical influences on stress reactivity. Cogn Ther Res. doi:10.1007/s10608-014-9657-1

  13. Diehl M, Hay EL (2010) Risk and resilience factors in coping with daily stress in adulthood: the role of age, self-concept incoherence, and personal control. Dev Psychol 46(5):1132–1146

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Folkman S, Moskowitz JT (2000) Positive affect and the other side of coping. Am Psychol 55(6):647–654

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fuller JA, Stanton JM, Fisher GG, Spitzmuller C, Russell SS, Smith PC (2003) A lengthy look at the daily grind: time series analyses of events, mood, stress, and satisfaction. J Appl Psychol 88(6):1019–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gable SL, Reis HT, Elliot AJ (2000) Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. J Pers Soc Psychol 78(6):1135–1149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gerstorf D, Ram N, Mayraz G, Hidajat M, Lindenberger U, Wagner GG, Schupp J (2010) Late-life decline in well-being across adulthood in Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States: something is seriously wrong at the end of life. Psychol Aging 25(2):477–485

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grzywacz JG, Almeida DM (2008) Stress and binge drinking: a daily process examination of stressor pile-up and socioeconomic status in affect regulation. Int J Stress Manag 15(4):364–380

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grzywacz JG, Almeida DM, McDonald DA (2002) Work-family spillover and daily reports of work and family stress in the adult labor force. Fam Relat 51:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hay EL, Diehl M (2010) Reactivity to daily stressors in adulthood: the importance of stressor type in characterizing risk factors. Psychol Aging 25(1):118–131

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffman L, Stawski RS (2009) Persons as contexts: evaluating between-person and within-person effects in longitudinal analysis. Res Hum Dev 6(2–3):97–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jacobs N, Myin-Germeys I, Derom C, Delespaul P, van Os J, Nicolson NA (2007) A momentary assessment study of the relationship between affective and adrenocortical stress responses in daily life. Biol Psychol 74:60–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krantz DS, McCeney MK (2002) Effects of psychological and social factors on organic disease: a critical assessment of research on coronary heart disease. Annu Rev Psychol 53:341–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kunzmann U (2008) Differential age trajectories of positive and negative affect: further evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 63B(5):P261–P270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Magai CM (2001) Emotions over the lifespan. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW (eds) Handbook of the psychology of aging, 5th edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 399–426

  26. Mroczek DK, Almeida DM (2004) The effect of daily stress, personality, and age on daily negative affect. J Pers 72(2):355–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mroczek DK, Kolarz CM (1998) The effect of age on positive and negative affect: a developmental perspective on happiness. J Pers Soc Psychol 75(5):1333–1349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Neupert SD, Almeida DM, Mroczek DK, Spiro A (2006) Daily stressors and memory failures in a naturalistic setting: findings from the VA Normative Aging Study. Psychol Aging 21(2):424–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ong AD, Bergeman CS, Bisconti TL, Wallace KA (2006) Psychological resilience, positive emotions, and successful adaptation to stress in later life. J Pers Soc Psychol 91(4):730–749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Piazza JR, Almeida DM, Dmitrieva NO, Klein LC (2010) Frontiers in the use of biomarkers of health in research on stress and aging. J Gerontol Psychol Soc Sci 65B(5):513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Piazza JR, Charles ST, Sliwinski MJ, Mogle J, Almeida DM (2013) Affective reactivity to daily stressors and long-term risk of reporting a chronic physical health condition. Ann Behav Med 45:110–120

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pinquart M (2001) Age differences in perceived positive affect, negative affect, and affect balance in middle and old age. J Happiness Stud 2:375–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Röcke C, Li SC, Smith J (2009) Intraindividual variability in positive and negative affect over 45 days: do older adults fluctuate less than young adults? Psychol Aging 24(4):863–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schilling OK, Diehl M (2014) Reactivity to stressor pile-up in adulthood: effects on daily negative and positive affect. Psychol Aging 29(1):72–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Schilling OK, Diehl M (2015) Emotional reactivity to accumulated daily stress: the older, the cooler? In: Simm A (Chair), Stress and healthy aging: a contradiction in terms? Symposium conducted April 26th 2015 at the 8th Congress of the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics European Region, Dublin, Ireland

  36. Schilling OK, Wahl HW, Wiegering S (2013) Affective development in advanced old age: analyses of terminal change in positive and negative affect. Dev Psychol 49(5):1011–1020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schneiderman N, Ironson G, Siegal SD (2005) Stress and health: psychological, behavioral, and biological determinants. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 1:607–628

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Serido J, Almeida DM, Wethington E (2004) Chronic stressors and daily hassles: unique and interactive relationships with psychological distress. J Heal Soc Behav 45:17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR (2008) Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:1–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Smyth J, Ockenfels MC, Porter L, Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DH, Stone AA (1998) Stressors and mood measured on a momentary basis are associated with salivary cortisol secretion. Psychoneuroendocrinology 23(4):353–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sliwinski MJ, Almeida DM, Smyth J, Stawski RS (2009) Individual change and variability in daily stress processes: findings from two measurement burst studies. Psychol Aging 24(4):828–840

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stawski RS, Almeida DM, Lachman ME, Tun PA, Rosnick CB, Seeman T (2011) Associations between cognitive function and naturally occurring daily cortisol during middle adulthood: timing is everything. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 66B(S 1):i71–i81

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Stawski RS, Cichy KE, Piazza JR, Almeida DM (2013) Associations among daily stressors and salivary cortisol: findings from the national study of daily experiences. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38:2654–2665

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stawski RS, Mogle JA, Sliwinski MJ (2013) Associations among fluid and crystallized cognition and daily stress processes in older adults. Psychol Aging 28(1):57–63

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Stawski RS, Sliwinski MJ, Almeida DM, Smyth JM (2008) Reported exposure and emotional reactivity to daily stressors: the roles of adult age and global perceived stress. Psychol Aging 23(1):52–61

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Uchino BN, Berg CA, Smith TW, Pearce G, Skinner M (2006) Age-related differences in ambulatory blood pressure during daily stress: evidence for greater blood pressure reactivity with age. Psychol Aging 21(2):231–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Uchino BN, Birmingham W, Berg CA (2010) Are older adults less or more physiologically reactive? A meta-analysis of age-related differences in cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory tasks. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 65B(2):154–162

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Vogel N, Schilling OK, Wahl HW, Beekman ATF, Penninx BWJH (2013) Time-to-death-related change in positive and negative affect among older adults approaching the end of life. Psychol Aging 28(1):128–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Watson D, Wiese DW, Vaidya J, Tellegen A (1999) Two general activation systems of affect: structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 76(5):820–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Windsor TD, Gerstorf D, Luszcz MA (2015) Social resource correlates of levels and time-to-death-related changes in late-life affect. Psychol Aging 30(1):136–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Karl Schilling.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

O.K. Schilling and M. Diehl state that there are no conflicts of interest.

This article does not contain any studies on human or animal subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schilling, O., Diehl, M. Psychological vulnerability to daily stressors in old age. Z Gerontol Geriat 48, 517–523 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-015-0935-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-015-0935-7

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation