Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of the statistical homogeneity of the Twentieth Century Reanalysis

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Twentieth Century Reanalysis (20CR) holds the distinction of having the longest record length (140-year; 1871–2010) of any existing global atmospheric reanalysis. If the record can be shown to be homogenous, then it would be the first reanalysis suitable for long-term trend assessments, including those of the regional hydrologic cycle. On the other hand, if discontinuities exist, then their detection and attribution—either to artificial observational shocks or climate change—is critical to their proper treatment. Previous research suggested that the quintupling of 20CR’s assimilated observation counts over the central United States was the primary cause of inhomogeneities for that region. The same work also revealed that, depending on the season, the complete record could be considered homogenous. In this study, we apply the Bai-Perron structural change point test to extend these analyses globally. A rigorous evaluation of 20CR’s (in)homogeneity is performed, composed of detailed quantitative analyses on regional, seasonal, inter-variable, and intra-ensemble bases. The 20CR record is shown to be homogenous (natural) for 69 (89) years at 50 % of land grids, based on analysis of the July 2 m air temperature. On average 54 % (41 %) of the grids between 60°S and 60°N are free from artificial inhomogenetites in their February (July) time series. Of the more than 853,376 abrupt shifts detected in 26 variable fields over two monthly time series, approximately 72 % are non-climate in origin; 25 % exceed 1.8 standard deviations of the preceding time series. The knock-on effect of inhomogeneities in 20CR’s boundary forcing and surface pressure data inputs to its surface analysis fields is implicated. In the future, reassessing these inhomogeneities will be imperative to achieving a more definitive attribution of 20CR’s abrupt shifts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan R, Ansell T (2006) A new globally complete monthly historical gridded mean sea level pressure dataset (HadSLP2): 1850-2004. J Climate 19(22):5816–5842. doi:10.1175/Jcli3937.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews DWK (1993) Tests for parameter instability and structural-change with unknown change-point. Econometrica 61(4):821–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell TJ, Jones PD, Allan RJ, Lister D, Parker DE, Brunet M, Moberg A, Jacobeit J, Brohan P, Rayner NA, Aguilar E, Alexandersson H, Barriendos M, Brandsma T, Cox NJ, Della-Marta PM, Drebs A, Founda D, Gerstengarbe F, Hickey K, Jonsson T, Luterbacher J, Nordli O, Oesterle H, Petrakis M, Philipp A, Rodwell MJ, Saladie O, Sigro J, Slonosky V, Srnec L, Swail V, Garcia-Suarez AM, Tuomenvirta H, Wang X, Wanner H, Werner P, Wheeler D, Xoplaki E (2006) Daily mean sea level pressure reconstructions for the European-North Atlantic region for the period 1850-2003. J Climate 19(12):2717–2742. doi:10.1175/Jcli3775.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J (1997) Estimation of a change point in multiple regression models. Rev Econ Stat 79(4):551–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Perron P (2003) Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. J Appl Econom 18(1):1–22. doi:10.1002/Jae.659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker A, Finger P, Meyer-Christoffer A, Rudolf B, Schamm K, Schneider U, Ziese M (2013) A description of the global land-surface precipitation data products of the Global Precipitation Climatology Centre with sample applications including centennial (trend) analysis from 1901-present. Earth Syst Sci Data Discuss 5:921–998. doi:10.5194/essd-5-71-2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts AK (2009) Land-surface-atmosphere coupling in observations and models. J Adv Model Earth Syst 1(4):18. doi:10.3894/JAMES.2009.1.4

    Google Scholar 

  • Compo GP, Whitaker JS, Sardeshmukh PD (2006) Feasibility of a 100-year reanalysis using only surface pressure data. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87(2):175. doi:10.1175/Bams-87-2-175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compo GP, Whitaker JS, Sardeshmukh PD, Matsui N, Allan RJ, Yin X, Gleason BE, Vose RS, Rutledge G, Bessemoulin P, Bronnimann S, Brunet M, Crouthamel RI, Grant AN, Groisman PY, Jones PD, Kruk MC, Kruger AC, Marshall GJ, Maugeri M, Mok HY, Nordli O, Ross TF, Trigo RM, Wang XL, Woodruff SD, Worley SJ (2011) The twentieth century reanalysis project. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 137(654):1–28. doi:10.1002/qj.776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compo GP, Whitaker JS, Sardeshmukh PD, Giese B (2012) Developing the Sparse Input Reanalysis for Climate Applications (SIRCA) 1850-2014. Paper presented at the 4th World Climate Research Programme International Conference on Reanalyses, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA, 7–11 May 2012

  • Dee DP, Uppala SM, Simmons AJ, Berrisford P, Poli P, Kobayashi S, Andrae U, Balmaseda MA, Balsamo G, Bauer P, Bechtold P, Beljaars ACM, van de Berg L, Bidlot J, Bormann N, Delsol C, Dragani R, Fuentes M, Geer AJ, Haimberger L, Healy SB, Hersbach H, Holm EV, Isaksen L, Kallberg P, Kohler M, Matricardi M, McNally AP, Monge-Sanz BM, Morcrette JJ, Park BK, Peubey C, de Rosnay P, Tavolato C, Thepaut JN, Vitart F (2011a) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 137(656):553–597. doi:10.1002/qj.828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee DP, Kallen E, Simmons AJ, Haimberger L (2011b) Comments on “Reanalyses suitable for characterizing long-term trends”. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 92(1):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ek MB, Mitchell KE, Lin Y, Rogers E, Grunmann P, Koren V, Gayno G, Tarpley JD (2003) Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model. J Geophys Res Atmos 108 (D22)

  • Ferguson CR, Villarini G (2012) Detecting inhomogeneities in the twentieth century reanalysis over the central United States. J Geophys Res-Atmos 117:D05123. doi:10.1029/2011jd016988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson CR, Wood EF (2011) Observed land-atmosphere coupling from satellite remote sensing and re-analysis. J Hydrometeorol 12(6):1221–1254. doi:10.1175/2011JHM1380.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson CR, Wood EF, Vinukollu RV (2012) A global inter-comparison of modeled and observed land-atmosphere coupling. J Hydrometeorol early-online. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-11-0119.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Folland CK, Parker DE (1995) Correction of instrumental biases in historical sea-surface temperature data. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 121(522):319–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Francisco R (2000) Uncertainties in regional climate change prediction: a regional analysis of ensemble simulations with the HADCM2 coupled AOGCM. Clim Dyn 16(2–3):169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang SM, Meng KC, Cane MA (2011) Civil conflicts are associated with the global climate. Nature 476(7361):438–441. doi:10.1038/Nature10311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington TG (2006) Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis. J Hydrol 319(1–4):83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishii M, Shouji A, Sugimoto S, Matsumoto T (2005) Objective analyses of sea-surface temperature and marine meteorological variables for the 20th century using ICOADS and the Kobe collection. Int J Climatol 25(7):865–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnay E, Kanamitsu M, Kistler R, Collins W, Deaven D, Gandin L, Iredell M, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Zhu Y, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Higgins W, Janowiak J, Mo KC, Ropelewski C, Wang J, Leetmaa A, Reynolds R, Jenne R, Joseph D (1996) The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 77(3):437–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanamitsu M, Alpert JC, Campana KA, Caplan PM, Deaven DG, Iredell M, Katz B, Pan HL, Sela J, White GH (1991) Recent changes implemented into the global forecast system at NMC. Weather Forecast 6(3):425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan A, Kushnir Y, Cane MA, Blumenthal MB (1997) Reduced space optimal analysis for historical data sets: 136 years of Atlantic sea surface temperatures. J Geophys Res-Oceans 102(C13):27835–27860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy JJ, Rayner NA, Smith RO, Parker DE, Saunby M (2011a) Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea surface temperature observations measured in situ since 1850: 1. Measurement and sampling uncertainties. J Geophys Res-Atmos 116:D14103. doi:10.1029/2010jd015218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy JJ, Rayner NA, Smith RO, Parker DE, Saunby M (2011b) Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea surface temperature observations measured in situ since 1850: 2. Biases and homogenization. J Geophys Res-Atmos 116:D14104. doi:10.1029/2010jd015220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kistler R, Kalnay E, Collins W, Saha S, White G, Woollen J, Chelliah M, Ebisuzaki W, Kanamitsu M, Kousky V, van den Dool H, Jenne R, Fiorino M (2001) The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means CD-ROM and documentation. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 82(2):247–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrimore JH, Menne MJ, Gleason BE, Williams CN, Wuertz DB, Vose RS, Rennie J (2011) An overview of the global historical climatology network monthly mean temperature data set, version 3. J Geophys Res-Atmos 116:D19121. doi:10.1029/2011jd016187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319(5863):607–610. doi:10.1126/science.1152339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVicar TR, Van Niel TG, Li LT, Roderick ML, Rayner DP, Ricciardulli L, Donohue RJ (2008) Wind speed climatology and trends for Australia, 1975-2006: capturing the stilling phenomenon and comparison with near-surface reanalysis output. Geophys Res Lett 35 (20)

  • Meehl GA, Hu AX, Santer BD (2009) The Mid-1970s climate shift in the pacific and the relative roles of forced versus inherent decadal variability. J Climate 22(3):780–792. doi:10.1175/2008jcli2552.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TD, Jones PD (2005) An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol 25(6):693–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TD, Carter TR, Jones PD, Hulme M, New M (2004) A comprehensive set of high-resolution grids of monthly climate for Europe and the globe: the observed record (1901-2000) and 16 scenarios (2001-2100). Tyndall Centre Working Papers No 55 (Available at http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/biblio/working-papers):30

  • Moorthi S, Pan H-L, Caplan P (2001) Changes to the 2001 NCEP oerational MRF/AVN global analysis/forecast system. Technical Procedures Bulletin 484, NOAA, NWS: Silver Spring, MD Available from http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/tpb/484.htm

  • Moritz MA, Parisien M-A, Batllori E, Krawchuk MA, Dorn JV, Ganz DJ, Hayhoe K (2012) Climate change and disruptions to global fire activity. Ecosphere 3(6). doi:10.1890/ES11-00345.1

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P (1999) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part I: development of a 1961-90 mean monthly terrestrial climatology. J Climate 12(3):829–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New M, Hulme M, Jones P (2000) Representing twentieth-century space-time climate variability. Part II: development of 1901-96 monthly grids of terrestrial surface climate. J Climate 13(13):2217–2238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettitt AN (1979) A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. Appl Stat 28:126–135. doi:10.2307/2346729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell AM, Xu JJ (2011) A new assessment of the mid-1970s abrupt atmospheric temperature change in the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and associated solar forcing implications. Theor Appl Climatol 104(3–4):443–458. doi:10.1007/s00704-010-0344-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP (eds) (1992) Numerical recipes in c: the art of scientific computing, 2 edn. Cambridge University Press, 994 pp

  • Rayner NA, Parker DE, Horton EB, Folland CK, Alexander LV, Rowell DP, Kent EC, Kaplan A (2003) Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J Geophys Res-Atmos 108(D14):4407. doi:10.1029/2002jd002670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rienecker MM, Suarez MJ, Todling R, Bacmeister J, Takacs L, Liu H-C, Gu W, Sienkiewicz M, Koster RD, Gelaro R, Stajner I, Nielson E (2008) The GEOS-5 data assimilation system-documentation of versions 5.0.1 and 5.1.0 NASA GSFC technical report series on global modeling and data assimilation. NASA/TM-2007-104606 27:92

  • Rienecker MM, Suarez MJ, Gelaro R, Todling R, Bacmeister J, Liu E, Bosilovich M, Schubert SD, Takacs L, Kim G-K, Bloom S, Chen J, Collins D, Conaty A, da Silva AM, Gu W, Joiner J, Koster RD, Lucchesi R, Molod A, Owens T, Pawson S, Pegion P, Redder CR, Reichle R, Robertson FR, Ruddick AG, Sienkiewicz M, Woollen J (2011) MERRA-NASA’s modern-era retrospective analysis for research applications. J Clim. doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Nadiga S, Thiaw C, Wang J, Wang W, Zhang Q, Van den Dool HM, Pan HL, Moorthi S, Behringer D, Stokes D, Pena M, Lord S, White G, Ebisuzaki W, Peng P, Xie P (2006) The NCEP climate forecast system. J Climate 19(15):3483–3517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan HL, Wu XR, Wang JD, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Kistler R, Woollen J, Behringer D, Liu HX, Stokes D, Grumbine R, Gayno G, Wang J, Hou YT, Chuang HY, Juang HMH, Sela J, Iredell M, Treadon R, Kleist D, Van Delst P, Keyser D, Derber J, Ek M, Meng J, Wei HL, Yang RQ, Lord S, Van den Dool H, Kumar A, Wang WQ, Long C, Chelliah M, Xue Y, Huang BY, Schemm JK, Ebisuzaki W, Lin R, Xie PP, Chen MY, Zhou ST, Higgins W, Zou CZ, Liu QH, Chen Y, Han Y, Cucurull L, Reynolds RW, Rutledge G, Goldberg M (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91(8):1015–1057. doi:10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schar C, Vidale PL, Luthi D, Frei C, Haberli C, Liniger MA, Appenzeller C (2004) The role of increasing temperature variability in European summer heatwaves. Nature 427(6972):332–336. doi:10.1038/Nature02300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider U, Becker A, Finger F, Meyer-Christoffer A, Ziese M, Rudolf B (2013) GPCC’s new land-surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle. Theor Appl Climatol. doi:10.1007/s00704-013-0860-x

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield J, Wood EF (2008) Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulations. Clim Dynam 31(1):79–105. doi:10.1007/s00382-007-0340-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TM, Reynolds RW (2003) Extended reconstruction of global sea surface temperatures based on COADS data (1854-1997). J Climate 16(10):1495–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Team RDC (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. For Stat. Comput., Vienna

  • Thorne PW, Vose RS (2010) Reanalyses suitable for characterizing long-term trends are they really achievable? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91(3):353. doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2858.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troy TJ, Sheffield J, Wood EF (2012) The role of winter precipitation and temperature on northern Eurasian streamflow trends. J Geophys Res-Atmos 117:D05131. doi:10.1029/2011jd016208

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313(5789):940–943. doi:10.1126/science.1128834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker JS, Hamill TM (2002) Ensemble data assimilation without perturbed observations. Mon Weather Rev 130(7):1913–1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmott CJ, Rowe CM, Philpot WD (1985) Small-scale climate maps: a sensitivity analysis of some common assumptions associated with grid-point interpolation and contouring. Am Cartographer 12(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worley SJ, Woodruff SD, Reynolds RW, Lubker SJ, Lott N (2005) ICOADS release 2.1 data and products. Int J Climatol 25(7):823–842. doi:10.1002/joc.1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeileis A, Kleiber C (2005) Validating multiple structural change models: a case study. J Appl Econom 20(5):685–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Kraemer W, Hornik K (2003) Testing and dating of structural changes in practice. Comput Stat Data Anal 44:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Gilbert Compo and Prashant Sardeshmukh for valuable discussions on this topic. The lead author was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowship for Foreign Researchers P10379: Climate change and the potential acceleration of the hydrological cycle. The second author received financial support from the Iowa Flood Center, IIHR-Hydroscience & Engineering. Support for the Twentieth Century Reanalysis (20CR) Project dataset is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science Innovative and Novel Computational Impact on Theory and Experiment (DOE INCITE) program, and Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER), and by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate Program Office. The 20CR version 2.0 and HadISST v1.1 data were obtained from the Research Data Archive (RDA; http://dss.ucar.edu), which is maintained by the Computational and Information Systems Laboratory (CISL) at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). 20CR every-member data was obtained from the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC; http://portal.nersc.gov/project/20C_Reanalysis/). Chesley McColl provided the 20CR assimilated observation count dataset. HadSLP2 was obtained from the Met Office Hadley Centre for Climate Change (www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadslp2/). The CRU TS3.1 dataset was obtained in May 2011 from the British Atmospheric Data Centre (BADC; http://badc.nerc.ac.uk). The GPCC v6 Full Data Reanalysis was obtained from the Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD; gpcc.dwd.de), operated under the auspices of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). The COBE SST dataset was obtained from the Japan Meteorological Agency Tokyo Climate Center (http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/products/elnino/cobesst/cobe-sst.html). ERSST v3b was obtained from the NOAA National Climate Data Center (ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/ersst/v3b/netcdf).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Craig R. Ferguson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 7585 kb)

Appendices

Appendix 1: Every member analyses for Geneva and Rondonia

In this section, we evaluate variability among the 56 ensemble members from which we assess only the ensemble mean (i.e., official 20CR product) in our study. We focus on two grid points: Geneva, Switzerland (46.20°N, 6.15°E) and Rondonia, Brazil (24.0°S, 51.0°W). The significance of these locations is the dichotomy of their supporting observational record. The record at Geneva benefits from a steady stream of approx. 300 observations per month over the period of availability. In contrast, not a single observation was ever assimilated at Rondonia.

Figures 14 and 15 present results of the Bai-Perron test performed on the 56-member monthly T a and P data at Geneva and Rondonia, respectively. In general, but particularly for Geneva, the confidence interval for the ensemble mean change point encompasses much of the cumulative 56-member confidence interval range. The figures show that a change point in the ensemble mean could be triggered by abrupt shifts in as few as five ensemble members. On the other hand, there are cases in which clusters of 20 ensemble member change points over 9 years (Fig. 15a, September) do not cause an equally significant shift in the ensemble mean. At Geneva, most of the variable-months are homogenous. This suggests, to us, that if a climate shift did occur, it was weak. At Rondonia, on the other hand, change points manifest in all variable-months (except July for T a), which we interpret as evidence of a strong shift.

Fig. 14
figure 14

Summary of the Bai-Perron test results for 20CR a T a and b P at Geneva, Switzerland. The horizontal magenta lines at the top of each subpanel (where detected) are the change points and associated 95 % confidence intervals computed from the 20CR ensemble mean field. The gray-filled area is the histogram of cumulative confidence intervals summed over 20CR’s 56 ensemble members. Vertical magenta bars show the number of ensemble members for which a change point is detected, multiplied by three for emphasis. Results from CRU T a (blue) and GPCC P (orange) are also included (where detected). Notice that no change points are detected for the latter. Also, note that the vertical scale in (b) varies

Fig. 15
figure 15

As in Fig. 14 but for Rondonia, Brazil. The tripling of cumulative change point counts for visual effect places the representative magenta bars outside plotting extents in May 1936 (38/56 ensemble members) for T a and the following cases for P: January 1988 (26/56 ensemble members); February 1985 (38/56 ensemble members); March 1951 (33/56 ensemble members) and 1973 (37/56 ensemble members); October 1972 (24/56 ensemble members); November 1965 (19/56 ensemble members); December 1976 (36/56 ensemble members)

Figure 15 exposes limitations of the Bai-Perron detection algorithm. Specifically, evidence of competing models (in a Bai-Perron sense) and detection limits can be seen [e.g., Fig. 15a: April, October, and November; Fig. 15b: October and December]. For example, at Rondonia, 17, 15, and 16 members of the T a ensemble had change points in November 1962, 1969, and 1978, respectively. In other words, three potential shifts were identified within a 17-year time period. Because of the imposed 21-year minimum segment length (Sect. 2.3.2), only one change point was resolved.

Appendix 2: Temperature spread fields over ocean

See Fig. 16.

Fig. 16
figure 16

For ocean domains, the area-averaged (at 2°) time series of 20CR July a assimilated observations, b T a ensemble spread, and c TMIN ensemble spread. Notice the y-axis scales of (b) and (c) vary substantially

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, C.R., Villarini, G. An evaluation of the statistical homogeneity of the Twentieth Century Reanalysis. Clim Dyn 42, 2841–2866 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1996-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1996-1

Keywords

Navigation