Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of steady swimming on fish escape performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Escape maneuvers are essential to the survival and fitness of many animals. Escapes are frequently initiated when an animal is already in motion. This may introduce constraints that alter the escape performance. In fish, escape maneuvers and steady, body caudal fin (BCF) swimming are driven by distinct patterns of curvature of the body axis. Pre-existing muscle activity may therefore delay or diminish a response. To quantify the performance consequences of escaping in flow, escape behavior was examined in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus) in both still-water and during steady swimming. Escapes executed during swimming were kinematically less variable than those made in still-water. Swimming escapes also had increased response latencies and lower peak velocities and accelerations than those made in still-water. Performance was also lower for escapes made up rather than down-stream, and a preference for down-stream escapes may be associated with maximizing performance. The constraints imposed by pre-existing motion and flow, therefore, have the potential to shape predator–prey interactions under field conditions by shifting the optimal strategies for both predators and prey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altringham JD, Ellerby DJ (1999) Fish swimming: patterns in muscle function. J Exp Biol 202:3397–3403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott SA, Neil DM, Ansell AD (1999) Escape trajectories of the brown shrimp Crangon crangon, and a theoretical consideration of initial escape angles from predators. J Exp Biol 202:193–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Card GM (2012) Escape behaviors in insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 22:180–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll AM, Ambrose AM, Anderson TA, Coughlin DJ (2009) Feeding muscles scale differently from swimming muscles in sunfish (Centrarchidae). Biol Lett 5:274–277

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Catania KC (2009) Tentacled snakes turn C-starts to their advantage and predict future prey behaviour. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:11183–11187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel TL (1984) Unsteady aspects of aquatic locomotion. Am Zool 24:121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond KM, Schoenfuss HL, Walker JA, Blob RW (2016) Is fish escape performance influenced by flow? Tests in the Hawaiian stream goby Sicyopterus simpsoni. Integr Comp Biol 56(suppl 1):e53

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenici P (2010) Context-dependent variability in the components of fish escape response: integrating locomotor performance and behaviour. J Exp Zool Part A 313:59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domenici P, Blake RW (1997) The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming. J Exp Biol 200:1165–1178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domenici P, Blagburn JM, Bacon JP (2011a) Animal escapology I: theoretical issues and emerging trends in escape trajectories. J Exp Biol 214:2463–2473

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Domenici P, Blagburn JM, Bacon JP (2011b) Animal escapology II: escape trajectory case studies. J Exp Biol 214:2474–2494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Domenici P, Wilson ADM, Kurvers RHJM, Marras S, Herbert-Read JE, Steffensen JF, Krause S, Viblanc PE, Couillaud P, Krause J (2014) How sailfish use their bills to capture schooling prey. Proc R Soc B 281:20140444. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton RC, Emberley DS (1991) How stimulus direction determines the trajectory of the mauthner-initiated escape response in a teleost fish. J Exp Biol 161:469–487

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton RC, Lavender WA, Wieland CM (1981) Identification of Mauthner-initiated response patterns in goldish: evidence from simultaneous cinematography and electrophysiology. J Comp Physiol 144:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellerby DJ, Altringham JD, Williams T, Block BA (2000) Slow muscle function of Pacific bonito (Sarda chiliensis) during steady swimming. J Exp Biol 203:2001–2013

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gerry SP, Robbins A, Ellerby D (2012) Variation in fast-start performance within a polyphenic population of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Physiol Biochem Zool 85:694–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghalambor CK, Reznick DN, Walker JA (2004) Constraints on adaptive evolution: the functional trade-off between reproduction and fast-start swimming performance in the Trinidadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Am Nat 164:38–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldbogen JA, Shadwick RE, Fudge DS, Gosline JM (2005) Fast-start muscle dynamics in the rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss: phase relationship of white muscle shortening and midline curvature. J Exp Biol 208:929–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hale ME (2002) S- and C-start escape responses of the muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) require alternative neuromotor mechanisms. J Exp Biol 205:2005–2016

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harper DG, Blake RW (1991) Prey capture and the fast-start performance of Northern Pike Esox lucius. J Exp Biol 155:175–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedenström A, Rosén M (2001) Predator versus prey: on aerial hunting and escape strategies in birds. Behav Ecol 12:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock AC, Chen T, Connolly E, Darakananda K, Jeong J, Quist A, Robbins A, Ellerby DJ (2015) Trade-offs between performance and variability in the escape responses of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Biol Open. doi:10.1242/bio.201511577

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogland R, Morris D, Tinbergen N (1956) The spines of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus and Pygosteus) as means of defence against predators (Perca and Esox). Behaviour 10:205–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howland HC (1974) Optimal strategies for predator avoidance: the relative importance of speed and manoeuverability. J Theor Biol 47:333–350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Humphries DA, Driver PM (1970) Protean defence by prey animals. Oecologia 5:285–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husak JF (2006) Does survival depend on how fast you can run or how fast you do run? Funct Ecol 20:1080–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski PG, Strausfeld NJ (2001) Exploitation of an ancient escape circuit by an avian predator: relationships between taxon-specific prey escape circuits and the sensitivity to visual cues by a predator. Brain Behav Evol 58:218–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jayne BC, Lauder GV (1993) Red and white muscle activity and kinematics of the escape response of the bluegill sunfish during swimming. J Comp Physiol A 173:495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir G, Camhi JM (1993) Escape response of black mollies (Poecilia sphenops) to predatory dives of a pied kingfisher (Ceryle rudis). Copeia 1993:549–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir G, Intrator N (1987) Striking of underwater prey by reef herons, Egretta gularis schistaeea. J Comp Physiol A 60:517–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir G, Tamir S, Schechtman E, Hareli S, Arad Z (1999) Cattle egrets are less able to cope with light refraction than are other herons. Anim Behav 57:687–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kullberg C, Jakobsson S, Fransson T (1998) Predator induced take-off strategy in great tits (Parus major). Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1659–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotem A, Schechtman E, Katir G (1991) Capture of submerged prey by little egrets, Egretta garzetta garzetta: strike depth, strike angle and the problem of light refraction. Anim Behav 42:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marczak W (1997) Water as a standard in the measurements of speed of sound in liquids. J Acoust Soc Am 102:2776–2779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV (1972) A multi-sample uniform scores test on a circle and its parametric competitor. J R Stat Soc Ser B 34:102–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Marras S, Killen SS, Claireaux G, Domenici P, Domenici P, McKenzie DJ (2011) Behavioural and kinematic components of the fast-start escape response in fish: individual variation and temporal repeatability. J Exp Biol 214:3102–3110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miles DB (2004) The race goes to the swift: fitness consequences of variation in sprint performance in juvenile lizards. Evol Ecol Res 6:63–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauen JC, Shadwick RE (2001) The dynamics and scaling of force production during the tail-flip escape response of the California spiny lobster Panulirus interruptus. J Exp Biol 204:1817–1830

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin AM, Diamond KM, Schoenfuss HL, Blob RW (2016) Field observation of intraspecific and predatory attack behaviors of the Hawaiian sleeper fish, Eleotris sandwicensis. Integr Comp Biol 56(suppl 1):e53

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadwick RE, Gemballa S (2006) Structure, kinematics, and muscle dynamics in undulatory swimming. In: Shadwick RE, Lauder GV (eds) Fish Biomechanics. Fish Physiology vol 23. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 241–280

  • Soto A, Stewart WJ, McHenry MJ (2015) When optimal strategy matters to prey fish. Int Comp Biol 55:110–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spierts IL, van Leeuwen JL (1999) Kinematics and muscle dynamics of C- and S-starts of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). J Exp Biol 202:393–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svoboda KR, Fetcho JR (1996) Interactions between the neural networks for escape and swimming in goldfish. J Neurosci 16:843–852

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tytell ED, Lauder GV (2008) Hydrodynamics of the escape response in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis macrochirus. J Exp Biol 211:3359–3369

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeling JM (2006) Fast-start mechanics. In: Shadwick RE, Lauder GV (eds) Fish biomechanics, fish physiology, vol 23. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 333–368

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walker JA (1998) Estimating velocities and accelerations of animal locomotion: a simulation experiment comparing numerical differentiation algorithms. J Exp Biol 201:981–995

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JA, Ghalambor CK, Griset OL, McKenney D, Reznick DN (2005) Do faster starts increase the probability of evading predators? Funct Ecol 19:808–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins TB (1996) Predator-mediated selection on burst swimming performance in tadpoles of the Pacific tree frog, Pseudacris regilla. Physiol Zool 69:154–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1976) The effect of size on the fast-start performance of rainbow trout Salmo gairdneri, and a consideration of piscivorous predator-prey interactions. J Exp Biol 65:157–177

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb PW (1978) Fast-start performance and body form in seven species of teleost fish. J Exp Biol 74:211–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Weihs D (1973) The mechanism of rapid starting in slender fish. Biorheology 10:343–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wöhl S, Schuster S (2007) The predictive start of hunting archer fish: a flexible and precise motor pattern performed with the kinematics of an escape C-start. J Exp Biol 210:311–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Department of Biological Sciences at Wellesley College, a Wellesley College Faculty Research Grant, and National Science Foundation grant 1354274 to DE. All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Wellesley College.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Ellerby.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anwar, S.B., Cathcart, K., Darakananda, K. et al. The effects of steady swimming on fish escape performance. J Comp Physiol A 202, 425–433 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1090-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-016-1090-3

Keywords

Navigation