Skip to main content
Log in

Free triples, large indifference classes and the majority rule

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We study classes of voting situations where agents may exhibit a systematic inability to distinguish between the elements of certain sets of alternatives. These sets of alternatives may differ from voter to voter, thus resulting in personalized families of preferences. We study the properties of the majority relation when defined on restricted domains that are the cartesian product of preference families, each one reflecting the corresponding agent’s objective indifferences, and otherwise allowing for all possible (strict) preference relations among alternatives. We present necessary and sufficient conditions on the preference domains of this type, guaranteeing that majority rule is quasi-transitive and thus the existence of Condorcet winners at any profile in the domain, and for any finite subset of alternatives. Finally, we compare our proposed restrictions with others in the literature, to conclude that they are independent of any previously discussed domain restriction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Black D (1948) On the rationale of group decision-making. J Polit Econ 56: 23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demange G (1982) Single-peaked orders on a tree. Math Soc Sci 3: 389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demange G (2004) On group stability in hierarchies and networks. J Polit Econ 112: 754–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta B, Jackson MO, Le Breton M (2001) Strategic candidacy and voting procedures. Econometrica 69: 1013–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner W (2001) Domain conditions in social choice theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grandmont J-M (1978) Intermediate preferences and the majority rule. Econometrica 46: 317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inada K-I (1964) A note on the simple majority decision rule. Econometrica 32: 525–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inada K-I (1969) The simple majority decision rule. Econometrica 37: 490–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Castrillo JD, Wettstein David (2002) Choosing wisely: a multi-bidding approach. Am Econ Rev 92: 1577–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plott CR (1973) Path independence, rationality, and social choice. Econometrica 41: 1075–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salles M (1976) Characterization of transitive individual preferences for quasi-transitive collective preference for simple games. Int Econ Rev 17: 308–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Pattanaik PK (1969) Necessary and sufficient conditions for rational choice under majority decision. J Econ Theory 1: 178–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Ehlers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barberà, S., Ehlers, L. Free triples, large indifference classes and the majority rule. Soc Choice Welf 37, 559–574 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0584-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-011-0584-8

Keywords

Navigation