Skip to main content
Log in

Skin friction topology in a region enclosed by penetrable boundary

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experiments in Fluids Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-resolution skin friction fields in separated flows on a low-aspect-ratio rectangular wing are obtained by using quantitative global skin friction diagnostics based on surface luminescent oil visualizations. The topological features like the isolated singular points and the boundary switch points in regions enclosed by penetrable boundaries are identified. The conservation law given by the Poincare–Bendixson index formula for the numbers of the isolated singular points and the boundary switch points is used as a general approach to analyze the topological structure of a skin friction field in a singly connected region enclosed by a penetrable boundary in the separated flows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chapman GT, Yates LA (1991) Topology of flow separation on three-dimensional bodies. Appl Mech Rev 44(7):329–346

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chern SS (1967) Studies in global geometry and analysis. The Mathematical Association of America, Wahington, p 44

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chow SN, Hale JK (1982) Methods of bifurcation theory. Springer, Berlin, pp 65–88

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dallmann U (1983) Topological structures of three-dimensional vortex flow separation. AIAA Paper 83-1735, July, Danvers, MA, USA

  • de Leeuw WC, van Liere R (1999) Collapsing flow topology using area metrics. In: D, Gross M, Hamann B (eds) Proceedings IEEE visualization’99 Ebert, pp 349–354

  • Délery JM (1992) Physics of vortical flows. J Aircraft 29(5):856–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Délery JM (2001a) Robert Legendre and Henri Werle: toward the elucidation of three-dimensional separation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33:129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Délery JM (2001b) Robert Legendre and Henri Werle: toward the elucidation of three-dimensional separation. J Aircraft 29(5):856–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • do Carmo MP (1976) Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River Chapter 4

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Firby PA, Gardiner CF (2001) Surface topology, 3rd edn. Horwood Publishing, Chichester Chapter 7

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Foss JF (2004) Surface selections and topological constraint evaluations for flow field analyses. Exp Fluids 37:883–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foss JF (2007) Topological considerations in fluid mechanics measurements. Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Springer, Berlin Chapter 13

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman P (1964) Ordinary differential equations. Wiley, New York Chapter VII

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung H, Perry AE (1984) Some aspects of three-dimensional separation. Part 1: streamsurface bifurcation. Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforsch. 8(heft 2):77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh T, Wang KC (1996) Three-dimensional separated flow structure over a cylinder with a hemispherical cap. J Fluid Mech 324:83–108

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt JCR, Abell CJ, Peterka JA, Woo H (1978) Kinematical studies of the flows around free or surface-mounted obstacles; applying topology to flow visualization. J Fluid Mech 88(Part 1):179–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izydorek M, Rybicki S, Szafaniec Z (1996) A note on the Poincare-Bendixson index theorem. Kodai Math J 19:145–156

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey LC (1993) Topology of surface. Springer, Berlin Chapter 11

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre R (1956) Separation de l’ecoulement laminaire tridimensionell. La Recherche Aeronautique. No. 54, Nov–Dec, pp 3–8

  • Lighthill MJ (1963) Attachment and separation in three-dimensional flows. In: Rosenhead L (ed) Laminar boundary layer theory, sect. II 2.6. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 72–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Shen L (2008) Fluid flow and optical flow. J Fluid Mech 614(11):253–291

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Montefort J, Woodiga S, Merati P, Shen L (2008) Global luminescent oil-film skin friction meter. AIAA J 46(2):476–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Wang B, Woodiga S (2010) Physics-based optical flow method in global flow diagnostics, AIAA Paper 2010-4361, The 27th AIAA Aerodynamics Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, Chicago, IL, June 27–July 1

  • Ma T, Wang S (2001) A generalized Poincare-Hopf index formula and its applications to 2-D incompressible flows. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Appl 2:467–482

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Perry AE, Chong MS (1986) A series-expansion study of the Navier-Stokes equations with application to three-dimensional separation patterns. J Fluid Mech 173:207–223

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Perry AE, Chong MS (1987) A description of eddying motions and flow patterns using critical-point concepts. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 19:125–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surana A, Grunberg O, Haller G (2006) Exact theory of three-dimensional flow separation. Part 1. Steady separation. J Fluid Mech 564:57–103

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Surana A, Jacobs GB, Haller G (2007) Extraction of separation and attachment surfaces from three-dimensional steady shear flows. AIAA J 45(6):1290–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobak M, Peake DJ (1982) Topology of three-dimensional separation flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 14:61–85

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang KC (1974) Boundary layer over a blunt body at high incidence with an open-type separation. Proc R Soc Lond A 340:33–55

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Ming-de Zhou and three reviewers particularly the reviewer #1 for their constructive comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianshu Liu.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Simple derivation of the Poincare–Bendixson index formula

Consider a vector field on a surface in a region enclosed by a penetrable boundary across which vectors can move freely inward and outward. The relationship between the isolated singular points enclosed by the boundary and the inflow and outflow across the boundary exists as a topological constraint. In fact, this constraint was discussed by Hartman (1964) and Izydorek et al. (1996) in the framework of the Poincare–Bendixson theory. Furthermore, de Leeuw and van Liere (1999) gave a useful form of the constraint on the numbers of the isolated singular points and the positive and negative switch points on the boundary. Here, a more applicable form of the constraint for the flow topology analysis is given as a conservation law between the numbers of the isolated singular points and the switch points in a singly connected region enclosed a penetrable boundary on a surface. It is noted that the following result cannot be considered as a new theorem since it is a direct consequence of the previous works. The intent of this Appendix is to provide an exposition of the Poincare–Bendixson index formula for fluid dynamicists.

Consider an open set Ω ⊂ R 2 bounded by a closed boundary \( \partial \Upomega \) and define τ is a smooth 2D vector field on Ω. It is assumed that there are a finite number of the isolated singular points \( x_{1} , \ldots ,x_{n} \in \Upomega \). The index of τ at x k is denoted by I k  = w(C k ) that is defined as the winding number on a small circle C k around x k (Kinsey 1991). We denote B + as the segment of the boundary where τ moves inward across \( \partial \Upomega \) and B as the segment where τ moves outward across \( \partial \Upomega \). If there exists a point \( Z \in \partial \Upomega \) at which \( B^{ + } \) and B are divided, this point is called a switch point. There are two types of switch points. If τ in a sufficiently small neighborhood of \( Z \in \partial \Upomega \) moves inward first and then outward across \( \partial \Upomega \), this switch point is negative, which is denoted by Z . Otherwise, a switch point is positive, which is denoted by Z +, if τ moves outward first and then inward across \( \partial \Upomega \) in its neighborhood. The negative and positive switch points on a boundary are illustrated in Fig. 14. In fact, the positive and negative switch points are also called the internal and external tangent points termed by Hartman (1964) and Izydorek et al. (1996).

Fig. 14
figure 14

Boundary switch points, (a) negative one and (b) positive one

Since \( \Upomega \subset R^{2} \) is homeomorphic to a unit disk \( D = \left\{ {\,\left. {\,x \in R^{2} } \right|\,\;|x|\; < \;1\,} \right\} \), the closed boundary \( \partial \Upomega \) is topologically equivalent to a unit circle \( C = \partial D \). The Poincare index theorem for a disk indicates \( w(C) = \sum\nolimits_{k} {I_{k} } \), where \( w(C) \) is the winding number of τ on C that is also the index of C (Kinsey 1991). Further, the winding number w(C) is given by \( w(C) = {{1 + (e - h)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{1 + (e - h)} 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2} \) according to the Poincare–Bendixson theorem, where e is the number of the elliptical sectors and h is the number of the hyperbolic sectors of τ (Chow and Hale 1982, Firby and Gardiner 2001). As illustrated in Fig. 15, an elliptical sector and a hyperbolic sector correspond to a positive switch point and a negative switch point, respectively. In other words, e is equal to the number of the positive switch points and h the number of the negative switch points. Therefore, the relation between the indices of the singular points in Ω and the number of the switch points on \( \partial \Upomega \) is

$$ \sum\limits_{k} {\,I_{k} } = 1 + \frac{1}{2}\;\left( {\sum\limits_{k} {\,Z_{k}^{ + } } - \sum\limits_{k} {\,Z_{k}^{ - } } } \right) . $$
(2)

Since Eq. (2) is a direct consequence of the Poincare index theorem for a disk and the Poincare–Bendixson theorem, it is simply referred to as the Poincare–Bendixson index formula.

Fig. 15
figure 15

Sectors in the unit disk, where H, E and P denote the hyperbolic, elliptical and parabolic sectors, respectively

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, T., Woodiga, S. & Ma, T. Skin friction topology in a region enclosed by penetrable boundary. Exp Fluids 51, 1549–1562 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1171-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1171-6

Keywords

Navigation