Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II study of lapatinib and capecitabine in second-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer

  • Clinical Trial Report
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer typically have poor survival. Erlotinib, a targeted therapy that inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activity (overexpressed in 40–60 % of pancreatic cancers), was FDA approved for the treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), another member of the ErbB family of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, has also been a therapeutic target of interest in pancreatic cancer; HER-2 overexpression is found in 20 % of pancreatic cancers. Lapatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that binds to both EGFR and HER-2. We conducted a single-arm phase II study to evaluate the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine in the second-line treatment of metastatic, gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Seventeen patients with metastatic, unresectable pancreatic cancer whose disease had progressed on first-line gemcitabine-based therapy were selected for this study. Patients were required to have an adequate performance status (ECOG 0–2) and normal hepatic and renal function prior to being enrolled. Patients received lapatinib 1250 mg PO daily 1 h before or after meals, and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 PO twice daily on days 1–14 of the 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was median overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and the safety profile of the combination therapy. Clinical toxicities were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Radiographic response was evaluated by RECIST criteria.

Results

Clinically, six of the 17 patients treated had disease progression (PD) after two cycles, six of 17 patients had stable disease (SD) and received more than four cycles (SD, range 4–22 cycles). For all patients, median PFS was 2.6 months (95 % CI 1.3–3.8) and median OS was 5.2 months (95 % CI 3.4–9). Treatment-related toxicities were limited to three (17 %) patients developing grade 3 adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue. When stratifying patients by treatment response, we found a statistically significant difference in median PFS and OS: median PFS was 1.4 months (95 % CI 1.0–1.8) in the PD group versus 4.0 months (95 % CI 1.8–6.3) in the SD group (P value = 0.001). Median OS was 2.9 months (95 % CI 0–7.3) in the PD group versus 8.3 months (95 % CI 0–21.2) in the SD group (P value = 0.023).

Conclusions

The combination of lapatinib and capecitabine is a tolerable regimen for patients with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer; however, this observation is based on the small number of patients enrolled in the trial. A subset of the enrolled patients had clinical benefit from treatment. Predictive biomarkers that allow selection of patients that will respond to this regimen should be further investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J et al (2010) Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60:277–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Burris HA III, Moore MJ, Anderson J et al (1997) Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 15:2403–2413

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, et al (2013) Final results of a randomized phase III study of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium, Abstract LBA 148

  4. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364:1817–1825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pelzer U, Kubica K, Stieler J, et al (2008) A randomized trial in patients with gemcitabine refractory pancreatic cancer. Final results of the CONKO 003 study. J Clin Oncol 26: suppl abstr 4508

  6. Boeck SH, Wilkowski R, Bruns CJ et al (2007) Oral capecitabine in gemcitabine-pretreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center study. J Clin Oncol 25(18S):15085

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cantore M, Rabbi C, Fiorentini G, Oliani C, Zamagni D, Iacono C, Mambrini A, Del Freo A, Manni A (2004) Combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced pre-treated pancreatic cancer. Oncology 67(2):93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoo C, Hwang JY, Kim JE, Kim TW, Lee JS, Park DH, Lee SS, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Han DJ, Kim SC, Lee JL (2009) A randomised phase II study of modified FOLFIRI.3 vs modified FOLFOX as second-line therapy in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 101(10):1658

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sudo K, Yamaguchi T, Nakamura K, Denda T, Hara T, Ishihara T, Yokosuka O (2011) Phase II study of S-1 in patients with gemcitabine-resistant advanced pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 67(2):249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemoine NR, Hughes CM, Barton CM et al (1992) The epidermal growth factor receptor in human pancreatic cancer. J Pathol 166:7–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dancer J, Takei H, Ro JY et al (2007) Coexpression of EGFR and HER-2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a comparative study using immunohistochemistry correlated with gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Oncol Rep 18:151–155

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tobita K, Kijima H, Dowaki S et al (2003) Epidermal growth factor receptor expression in human pancreatic cancer: significance for liver metastasis. Int J Mol Med 11:305–309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamanaka Y, Friess H, Kobrin MS et al (1993) Coexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and ligands in human pancreatic cancer is associated with enhanced tumor aggressiveness. Anticancer Res 13:565–569

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uegaki K, Nio Y, Inoue Y et al (1997) Clinicopathological significance of epidermal growth factor and its receptor in human pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 17:3841–3847

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kimura K, Sawada T, Komatsu M et al (2006) Antitumor effect of trastuzumab for pancreatic cancer with high HER-2 expression and enhancement of effect by combined therapy with gemcitabine. Clin Cancer Res 12:4925–4932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Larbouret C, Robert B, Navarro-Teulon I et al (2007) In vivo therapeutic synergism of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor and anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies against pancreatic carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 13:3356–3362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Xia W, Mullin RJ, Keith BR et al (2002) Antitumor activity of GW572016: a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocks EGF activation of EGFR/erbB2 and downstream Erk1/2 and AKT pathways. Oncogene 21:6255–6263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cameron D, Casey M, Press M et al (2008) A phase III randomized comparison of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in women with advanced breast cancer that has progressed on trastuzumab: updated efficacy and biomarker analyses. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112:533–543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. (2009) Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), Version 4.0 (v4.03; 2010). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. http://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf

  21. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Elisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghaneh P, Kawesha A, Evans JD et al (2002) Topics: pancreatic cancer-new horizons in diagnosis and treatment: molecular prognostic markers in pancreatic cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 9:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu J, Amiji M (2012) Therapeutic gene delivery and transfection in human pancreatic cancer cells using epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted gelatin nanoparticles. J Vis Exp 59:e3612

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Troiani T, Martinelli E, Capasso A et al (2012) Targeting EGFR in pancreatic cancer treatment. Curr Drug Targets 13:802–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang ZY, Yuan JQ, Di MY et al (2013) Gemcitabine plus erlotinib for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 8:e57528

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarkar S, Dubaybo H, Ali S et al (2013) Down-regulation of miR-221 inhibits proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells through up-regulation of PTEN, p27(kip1), p57(kip2), and PUMA. Am J Cancer Res 3:465–477

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aiwu Ruth He.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, Z., Gabrielson, A., Hwang, J.J. et al. Phase II study of lapatinib and capecitabine in second-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 76, 1309–1314 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2855-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2855-z

Keywords

Navigation