Abstract
Purpose
To construct a population pharmacokinetic model for temozolomide (TMZ), a novel imidazo-tetrazine methylating agent and its metabolites MTIC and AIC in infants and children with primary central nervous system tumors.
Methods
We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of TMZ and MTIC in 39 children (20 boys and 19 girls) with 132 pharmacokinetic studies (109 in the training set and 23 in the validation set). The median age was 7.1 years (range 0.7 to 21.9 years). Children received oral TMZ dosages ranging from 145 to 200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days in each course of therapy. Serial plasma samples were collected after the first and fifth doses of the first and third courses. Approximately eight plasma samples were collected up to 8 h after each dose, and assayed for TMZ, MTIC, and AIC by HPLC with UV detection. A one-compartment model was fitted to the TMZ and metabolite plasma concentrations using maximum likelihood estimation. Covariates, including demographics and biochemical data were tested for their effects on TMZ clearance (CL/F) and MTIC AUC utilizing a two-stage approach via linear mixed-effects modeling.
Results
The population mean (inter- and intrapatient variability expressed as %CV) for the pharmacokinetic parameters (based on the training set) were as follows: TMZ CL/F 5.4 l/h (53.4, 17.5), Vc/F 14.0 l (48.5, 39.2), Cmax 9.1 mg/l (20.8, 29.1), and MTIC AUC 1.0 μg/ml·h (13.9, 30.0). Covariate analysis showed that increasing age and body surface area (BSA) were associated with a significant increases in TMZ CL, Vc, and Cmax (P<0.05), and that increasing age was associated with significant decreases in TMZ and MTIC AUC. Indicators of liver and renal function were not significantly associated with TMZ pharmacokinetics or MTIC AUC. The final model with the significant covariates was validated using the remaining 23 pharmacokinetic studies.
Conclusions
This study extends previous work done in adults, and identified BSA and age as covariates that account for variability in TMZ disposition in infants and children with primary CNS malignancies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker SD, Wirth M, Statkevich P, Reidenberg P, Alton K, Sartorius SE, Dugan M, Cutler D, Batra V, Grochow LB, Donehower RC, Rowinsky EK (1999) Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of14C-temozolomide following oral administration to patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 5:309
Baker SD, Verweij J, Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC, Schellens JH, Grochow LB, Sparreboom A (2002) Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991–2001. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1883
Brandes AA, Pasetto LM, Monfardini S (2000) New drugs in recurrent high grade gliomas. Anticancer Res 20:1913
Britten CD, Rowinsky EK, Baker SD, Agarwala SS, Eckardt JR, Barrington R, Diab SG, Hammond LA, Johnson T, Villalona-Calero M, Fraass U, Statkevich P, Von Hoff DD, Eckhardt SG (1999) A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 5:1629
D'Argenio DZ, Schumitzky A (1990) ADAPT II user's guide. Biomedical Simulations Resource, USC, Los Angeles
de Jongh FE, Verweij J, Loos WJ, de Wit R, de Jonge MJ, Planting AS, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A (2001) Body-surface area-based dosing does not increase accuracy of predicting cisplatin exposure. J Clin Oncol 19:3733
Dhodapkar M, Rubin J, Reid JM, Burch PA, Pitot HC, Buckner JC, Ames MM, Suman VJ (1997) Phase I trial of temozolomide (NSC 362856) in patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 3:1093
Estlin EJ, Lashford L, Ablett S, Price L, Gowing R, Gholkar A, Kohler J, Lewis IJ, Morland B, Pinkerton CR, Stevens MC, Mott M, Stevens R, Newell DR, Walker D, Dicks-Mireaux C, McDowell H, Reidenberg P, Statkevich P, Marco A, Batra V, Dugan M, Pearson AD (1998) Phase I study of temozolomide in paediatric patients with advanced cancer. United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group. Br J Cancer 78:652
Gibaldi M, Perrier D (1982) Pharmacokinetics. Marcel Dekker, New York
Gurney H (1996) Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative. J Clin Oncol 14:2590
Gurney H (2002) How to calculate the dose of chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 86:1297
Hammond LA, Eckardt JR, Baker SD, Eckhardt SG, Dugan M, Forral K, Reidenberg P, Statkevich P, Weiss GR, Rinaldi DA, Von Hoff DD, Rowinsky EK (1999) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temozolomide on a daily-for-5-days schedule in patients with advanced solid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 17:2604
Jen JF, Cutler DL, Pai SM, Batra VK, Affrime MB, Zambas DN, Heft S, Hajian G (2000) Population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide in cancer patients. Pharm Res 17:1284
Lashford LS, Thiesse P, Jouvet A, Jaspan T, Couanet D, Griffiths PD, Doz F, Ironside J, Robson K, Hobson R, Dugan M, Pearson AD, Vassal G, Frappaz D (2002) Temozolomide in malignant gliomas of childhood: a United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group and French Society for Pediatric Oncology Intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 20:4684
Mathijssen RH, Verweij J, de Jonge MJ, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A (2002) Impact of body-size measures on irinotecan clearance: alternative dosing recommendations. J Clin Oncol 20:81
Newlands ES, Blackledge GRP, Slack JA, Rustin GJS, Smith DB, Stuart NSA, Quarterman CP, Hofman R, Stevens MFG, Brampton MH, Gibson AC (1992) Phase I trial of temozolomide (CCRG 81045: M&B 39831: NSC 362856). Br J Cancer 65:287
Prados MD (2000) Future directions in the treatment of malignant gliomas with temozolomide. Semin Oncol 27:41
Ratain MJ (1998) Body-surface area as a basis for dosing of anticancer agents: science, myth, or habit? J Clin Oncol 16:2297
Reid JM, Stevens DC, Rubin J, Ames MM (1997) Pharmacokinetics of 3-methyl-(triazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboximide following the administration of temozolomide to patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 3:2393
Sheiner LB, Beal SL (1981) Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 9:503
Shen F, Decosterd LA, Gander M, Leyvraz S, Biollaz J, Lejeune F (1995) Determination of temozolomide in human plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography after solid-phase extraction. J Liq Chromatogr B 667:291
Steimer JL, Mallet A, Golmard JL, Boisvieux JF (1984) Alternative approaches to estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters: comparison with the nonlinear mixed-effect model. Drug Metab Rev 15:265
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Lisa Walters, Terri Kuehner, Paula Condy, Margaret Edwards, and Sheri Ring for assistance in obtaining plasma samples, Suzan Hanna for her invaluable technical support in the laboratory, and Kathy Probst for her support with data management.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by USPHS awards CA 23099, Cancer Center CORE grant CA21765, the Schering Plough Institute, and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panetta, J.C., Kirstein, M.N., Gajjar, A. et al. Population pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and metabolites in infants and children with primary central nervous system tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 52, 435–441 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-003-0670-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-003-0670-4