Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nest distribution affects behaviour and mating success in a marine fish

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The distribution of breeding resources, such as nest sites, can have a pronounced impact on a population by affecting the proportion of individuals that succeed to breed and hence, the variation in reproductive success. Aggregation of important resources can lead to resource monopolisation by a limited number of individuals and thus affect the intensity of sexual selection. In this study, we tested, by contrasting two experimental treatments (dispersed vs. aggregated), how nest distribution affects: (1) mating behaviour, (2) male nest occupation and mating success, and (3) reproductive success and the opportunity for selection. We used the two-spotted goby (Gobiusculus flavescens), a small marine fish with a resource-based mating system, as our model species. When nests were aggregated, a larger proportion of the males behaved aggressively, fewer males succeeded in occupying a nest, fewer males became mated, and those males that mated received fewer eggs from spawning females. These effects resulted in a higher variance in reproductive success and hence, a higher opportunity for selection (I rs ), in the aggregated treatment. We suggest that the results are a direct consequence of males defending a territory around their nest, preventing competitively inferior males from breeding. However, we found no significant selection differentials for body length or condition of males in either treatment. Our results support the hypothesis that aggregation of essential resources like nests promotes resource monopolisation. In species facing highly clumped nesting resources in the wild, monopolisation may negatively impact population productivity but could lead to strong selection on traits that promote male competitive ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahnesjö I, Kvarnemo C, Merilaita S (2001) Using potential reproductive rates to predict mating competition among individuals qualified to mate. Behav Ecol 12:397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almada VC, Gonçalves EJ, Oliveira RF, Santos AJ (1995) Courting females: ecological constraints affect sex roles in a natural population of the blenniid fish Salaria pavo. Anim Behav 49:1125–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amorim MCP, Neves ASM (2008) Male painted gobies (Pomatoschistus pictus) vocalise to defend territories. Behaviour 145:1065–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen T, Forsgren E (2001) Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. P Natl Acad Sci USA 98:13155–13160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen T, Forsgren E (2003) Male preference for colourful females affected by male size in a marine fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ (1983) Sexual selection: The interface of theory and empiricism. In: Bateson P (ed) Mate choice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 67–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: theory. Evolution 38:709–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks SC, Lindenmayer DB, McBurney L, Blair D, Knight EJ, Blyton MD (2011) Kin selection in den sharing develops under limited availability of tree hollows for a forest marsupial. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2768–2776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjelvenmark J, Forsgren E (2003) Effects of mate attraction and male–male competition om paternal care in goby. Behaviour 140:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg ÅA, Forsgren E, Magnhagen C (2002) Plastic sex-roles in the common goby—the effect of nest availability. Oikos 98:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brevik C (2007) Reirplassvalg hos tangkutling Gobiusculus flavescens. Thesis (MSc), NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

  • Candolin U (1997) Predation risk affects courtship and attractiveness of competing threespine stickleback males. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:81–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins SP (1981) Littoral and benthic investigations on the west-coast of Ireland—XIII. The biolgy of Gobiusculus flavescens (Fabricius) on the Connemara Coast. P Roy Ir Acad B 81:63–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong K (2011) Operational sex ratio and reproductive behaviour in the two-spotted goby (Gobiusculus flavescens). PhD Thesis, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

  • de Jong K, Wacker S, Amundsen T, Forsgren E (2009) Do operational sex ratio and density affect mating behaviour? An experiment on the two-spotted goby. Anim Behav 78:1229–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen ST, Oring LW (1977) Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen JM (2007) Parental care behaviour and costs in male two-spotted gobies (Gobiusculus flavescens). Thesis (MSc), NTNU, Trondheim, Norway

  • Forero MG, Tella JL, Donazar JA (1996) Can interspecific competition and nest site availability explain the decrease of lesser kestrel Falco naumanni populations? Biol Conserv 78:289–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren E, Kvarnemo C, Lindström K (1996) Mode of sexual selection determined by resource abundance in two sand goby populations. Evolution 50:646–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsgren E, Amundsen T, Borg ÅA, Bjelvenmark J (2004) Unusally dynamic sex roles in a fish. Nature 429:551–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fosså JH (1991) The ecology of the 2-spot goby (Gobiusculus flavescens Fabricius)—potential for cod enhancement. ICES Mar Sci Symp 192:147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Genner MJ, Turner GF, Hawkins SJ (1999) Resource control by territorial male cichlid fish in Lake Malawi. J Anim Ecol 68:522–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giske J, Aksnes DL, Lie U, Wakili SM, Lockwood SJ (1991) Computer-simulation of pelagic production in Masfjorden, Western Norway, and its consequences for production of released 0-group cod. ICES Mar Sci Symp 192:161–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant JWA (1993) Whether or not to defend: the influence of resource distribution. Mar Behav Physiol 23:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant JWA (1997) Territoriality. In: Godin JGJ (ed) Behavioural ecology of teleost fish. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 81–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths SP (2002) Retention of visible implant tags in small rockpool fishes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 236:307–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hop H, Gjøsæter J, Danielssen DS (1992) Seasonal feeding ecology of cod (Gadus morhua L.) on the Norwegian Skagerrak coast. ICES J Mar Sci 49:453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hop H, Danielssen DS, Gjøsæter J (1993) Winter feeding ecology of cod (Gadus morhua) in a fjord of southern Norway. J Fish Biol 43:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA, Turner AK (1987) Animal conflict. Chapman and Hall, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Itzkowitz M (1974) The effects of other fish on the reproductive behaviour of the male variegated pupfish, Cyprinodon variegatus (Pisces:Cyprinodontidae). Behaviour 48:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzkowitz M (1979) Territorial tactics and habitat quality. Am Nat 114:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacot A, Valcu M, van Oers K (2009) Experimental nest site limitation affects reproductive strategies and parental investment in a hole-nesting passerine. Anim Behav 77:1075–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen S (1945) Studies on variation in fish in northern European waters. Bergens Mus Årb Nat Rekke 4:30–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AG, Walker D, Lindström K, Kvarnemo C, Avise JC (2001a) Surprising similarity of sneaking rates and genetic mating patterns in two populations of sand goby experiencing disparate sexual selection regimes. Mol Ecol 10:461–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AG, Walker D, Kvarnemo C, Lindström K, Avise JC (2001b) How cuckholdry can decrease the opportunity for sexual selection: data and theory from a genetic parentage analysis of the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus. P Natl Acad Sci USA 98:9151–9156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Heuschele J, Jennisons MD, Kokko H (2010a) The mismeasurement of sexual selection. J Evol Biol 23:447–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klug H, Lindström K, Kokko H (2010b) Who to include in measures of sexual selection is no trivial matter. Ecol Lett 19:1094–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodric-Brown A (1983) Determinants of male reproductive success in a pupfish (Cyprinodon pecosensis). Anim Behav 31:28–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig WD, Albano SS (1986) On the measurement of sexual selection. Am Nat 127:403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Rankin DJ (2006) Lonely hearts or sex in the city? Density-dependent effects in mating systems. Philos T Roy Soc B 361:319–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvarnemo C, Ahnesjö I (1996) The dynamics of operational sex ratio and competition for mates. Trends Ecol Evol 11:404–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen T, Lindström K (2004) Changes in sexual selection resulting from novel habitat use in the sand goby. Oikos 104:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström K (1988) Male–male competition for nest sites in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Oikos 53:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindström K (2001) Effects of resource distribution on sexual selection and the cost of reproduction in sand gobies. Am Nat 158:64–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C (1992) alternative reproductive behaviour in the common goby, Pomatoschistus microps: an ontogenetic gradient? Anim Behav 44:182–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C (1994) Sneak or challenge: alternative spawning tactics in non-territorial male common gobies. Anim Behav 47:1212–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C (2006) Information about an opponent can decrease aggression in male common gobies competing for nest sites. Anim Behav 71:879–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnhagen C, Kvarnemo C (1989) Big is better—the importance of size for reproductive success in male Pomatoschistus minutus (Pallas) (Piseces, Gobiidae). J Fish Biol 35:755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone JC, Forrester GE, Steele MA (1999) effect of subcutaneous microtagsbon the growth, survival, and vulnerability to predation of small reef fishes. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 237:243–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley KB, Amundsen T, Forsgren E, Svensson PA, Jones AG (2009) Multiple mating and a low incidence of cuckoldry for nest-holding males in the two-spotted goby, Gobiusculus flavescens. BMC Evol Biol 9:6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Myhre LC, de Jong K, Forsgren E, Amundsen A (2012) Sex roles and mutual mate choice matters during mate sampling. Am Nat 179:741–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nellbring S (1986) A quantitative and experimental study of goby (Pomatoschistus spp.) nests on shallow soft bottom, Northern Baltic Proper. Ophelia 25:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellbring S (1993) Spawning of two Pomatoschistus species (Gobiidae) in realtion to nest availability and depth: a field experiment. Neth J Sea Res 31:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pélabon C, Borg ÅA, Bjelvenmark J, Forsgren E (2003) Do male two-spotted gobies prefer larger fecund females? Behav Ecol 14:787–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard M, Juraida P, Smith C (2004) Male–male interference competition decreases spawning rate in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 56:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard M, Ondračková M, Bryjová A, Smith C, Bryja J (2009) Breeding resource distribution affects selection gradients on male phenotypic traits: experimental study on lifetime reproductive success in the bitterling fish (Rhodeus amarus). Evolution 63:377–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JD (1996) Animal breeding systems. Trends Ecol Evol 11:68–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santangelo N, Itzkowitz M, Richter M, Haley MP (2002) Resource attractiveness of the male beaugregory damselfish and his decision to court or defend. Behav Ecol 13:676–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saraiva JL, Barata EN, Canario AVM, Oliveira RF (2009) The effect of nest aggregation on the reproductive behaviour of the peacock blenny Salaria pavo. J Fish Biol 74:754–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Yasukawa K (1983) Sexual selection and red-winged black-birds. Am Sci 71:166–174

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princton University Press, Princton

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer A, Kvarnemo C, Lindström K, Svensson O (2006) Genetic mating patterns studied in pools with manipulated nest site availability in two populations of Pomatoschistus minutus. J Evol Biol 19:1641–1650

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skolbekken R, Utne-Palm AC (2001) Parental investment of male two-spotted goby, Gobiusculs flavescens (Fabricus). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 261:137–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C (2011) Good fences make good neighbours: the role of landmarks in territory partitioning in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Behaviour 148:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C, Reichard M, Douglas A, Jurajda P (2006) Population consequences of behaviour in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus Cyprinidae). Ecol Freshw Fish 15:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence R, Smith C (2005) Male territoriality mediates density and sex ratio effects on oviposition in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Anim Behav 69:1317–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strubbe D, Matthysen E (2009) Experimental evidence for nest-site competition between invasive ring-necked parakeets (Psittacula krameri) and native nuthatches (Sitta europaea). Biol Conserv 8:1588–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1985) Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and account for Bateman's data. Anim Behav 33:1349–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1987) Random and deterministic components of variance in mating success. In: Bradbury JW, Andersson MB (eds) Sexual selection: Testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester, pp 209–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson PA, Pélabon C, Blount JD, Surai PF, Amundsen T (2006) Does female nuptial coloration reflect egg carotenoids and clutch quality in the two-spotted goby (Gobiusculus flavescens, Gobiidae)? Funct Ecol 20:689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker S, de Jong K, Forsgren E, Amundsen T (2012) Large males fight and court more across a range of social environments: an experiment on the two-spotted goby Gobiusculus flavescens. J Fish Biol 81:21–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1979) Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am Nat 114:742–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF (2006) No evidence of current sexual selection on sexually dimorphic traits in a bird with high variance in mating success. Am Nat 167:171–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman EA, Côté I (2004) Dominance hierarchies in group-living cleaning gobies: causes and foraging consequences. Anim Behav 67:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Erlend Grandbo Rolseth for assisting with the experiment and to Katja Heubel, Carin Magnhagen, Ralph Dobler, Ola Svensson, Marcela Gonzalez, Lori Englebert, Dennis Sprenger, the Journal Club of the Animal Evolutionary Ecology at Tübingen University, Joachim Frommen, Franziska Schädelin and one anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on the manuscript. We thank the Sven Lovén Centre of Marine Sciences at Kristineberg for use of their facilities, technical support and hospitality. The study was financially supported by the Royal Swedish Academy of Science and the EU ASSEMBLE mobility programme.

Ethical standards

The study was conducted in accordance with Swedish laws on animal research and under license from The Swedish Board for Research on Animals.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Isabel Mück

    Present address: Institute of Evolution and Ecology (Animal Evolutionary Ecology), University of Tübingen, D-72076, Tübingen, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway

    Isabel Mück, Sebastian Wacker, Lise Cats Myhre & Trond Amundsen

Authors
  1. Isabel Mück
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sebastian Wacker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lise Cats Myhre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Trond Amundsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Mück.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Frommen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mück, I., Wacker, S., Myhre, L.C. et al. Nest distribution affects behaviour and mating success in a marine fish. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67, 609–619 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1480-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1480-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation