Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stingless bee response to spider webs is dependent on the context of encounter

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the course of their foraging bouts, bees frequently encounter spider webs among the vegetation. The ability to see and avoid these webs is vital for the success of the individual bee’s foraging bout. In this study, we report on the response of stingless bees (Trigona carbonaria) towards the webs of the St. Andrew’s Cross spider (Argiope keyserlingi). We studied the ability of bees to avoid webs in different contexts: when bees were on their foraging path or when they were returning to the hive as well as when they were flying North or South. We show that the probability of a bee being able to avoid a web depends on the context of the bee’s flight rather than the visual appearance of the web. Furthermore, the presence of the spider seems to alert the bee to the web, resulting in bees being more able to avoid capture. We show, specifically, that the probability of being captured is higher when the bee is returning to the hive compared with when the bee is foraging. The likelihood of avoiding a web is also influenced by the compass direction of the flight, although to a lesser extent. Our results indicate that the context of the predator–prey encounter has a significant influence on a bee’s ability to escape interception by a spider web.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biesmeijer J, Giurfa M, Koedam D, Potts S, Joel D, Dafni A (2005) Convergent evolution: floral guides, stingless bee nest entrances, and insectivorous pitchers. Naturwissenschaften 92:444–450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge TA (1998) Signal conflict in spider webs driven by predators and prey. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:1991–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge TA, Wenzel JW (2001) Silk mediated defense by an orb web spider against predatory mud-dauber wasps. Behaviour 138:155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blamires SJ, Hochuli DF, Thompson MB (2008) Why cross the web: decoration spectral properties and prey capture in an orb spider (Argiope keyserlingi) web. Biol J Linn Soc 94:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce MJ (2006) Silk decorations: controversy and consensus. J Zool 269:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce MJ, Herberstein ME (2006) Web decoration polymorphism in Argiope Audouin, 1826 (Araneidae) spiders: ontogenetic and interspecific variation. J Nat Hist 39:3833–3845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce MJ, Herberstein ME, Elgar MA (2001) Signalling conflict between prey and predator attraction. J Evol Biol 14:786–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce MJ, Heiling AM, Herberstein ME (2005) Spider signals: are web decorations visible to birds and bees? Biology Letters 1:299–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1979) How honeybees know their distance from a near-by visual landmark. J Exp Biol 82:367–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng RC, Tso IM (2007) Signaling by decorating webs luring prey or deterring predators? Behav Ecol 18:1085–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmiel K, Herberstein ME, Elgar MA (2000) Web damage and feeding experience influence web site tenacity in the orb-web spider Argiope keyserlingi Karsch. Anim Behav 60:821–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Craig CL (1988) Insect perception of spider orb webs in three light habitats. Funct Ecol 2:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig CL (1994) Predator foraging behavior in response to perception and learning by its prey—interactions between orb-spinning spiders and stingless bees. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig CL, Bernard GD (1990) Insect attraction to UV-reflecting spider webs and web decorations. Ecology 71:616–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig CL, Ebert K (1994) Color and pattern in predator–prey interactions—the bright body colors and patterns of a tropical orb-spinning spider attract flower-seeking prey. Funct Ecol 8:616–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig CL, Wolf SG, Davis JLD, Hauber ME, Maas JL (2001) Signal polymorphism in the web-decorating spider Argiope argentata is correlated with reduced survivorship and the presence of stingless bees, its primary prey. Evolution 55:986–993

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dollin AE, Dollin LJ, Sakagami SF (1997) Australian stingless bees of the genus Trigona (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Invertebr Taxon 11:861–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukas K (2001) Effects of predation risk on pollinators and plants. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds). Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2007) Stabilimenta of Philoponella vicina (Araneae: Uloboridae) and Gasteracantha cancriformis (Araneae: Areinidae): evidence against a prey attractant function. Biotropica 39:216–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2008) Araneus expletus (Araneae, Araneidae): another stabilimentum that does not function to attract prey. J Arachnol 36:191–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME (2002) Conspicuous colouration attracts prey to a stationary predator. Ecol Entomol 27:686–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heard TA (1999) The role of stingless bees in crop pollination. Annu Rev Entomol 44:183–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heiling AM (1999) Why do nocturnal orb-web spiders (Araneidae) search for light? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 46:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herberstein ME (2000) Foraging behaviour in orb-web spiders (Araneidae): do web decorations increase prey capture success in Argiope keyserlingi Karsch, 1878? Aust J Zool 48:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herberstein ME, Craig CL, Coddington JA, Elgar MA (2000) The functional significance of silk decorations of orb-web spiders: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 75:649–669

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoese FJ, Law EAJ, Rao D, Herberstein ME (2006) Distinctive yellow bands on a sit-and-wait predator: prey attractant or camouflage? Behaviour 143:763–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T, Salmah S, Abbas I, Yusuf E (1985) Foraging behavior of individual workers and foraging dynamics of colonies of three Sumatran stingless bees. Res Popul Ecol 27:373–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Li DQ (2005) Spiders that decorate their webs at higher frequency intercept more prey and grow faster. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:1753–1757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL (2002) Putting predators back into behavioral predator–prey interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotto RB, Chittka L (2005) Seeing the light: illumination as a contextual cue to color choice behavior in bumblebees. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(10):3852–3856

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD (1961) Observations on the nests and behavior of Trigona in Australia and New Guinea (Hymnenoptera, Apidae). Am Mus Novit 2026:1–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Heller R (1978) Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Nature 275:642–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platnick N (2008) The world spider catalog, version 9.0. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html

  • Rao D, Cheng K, Herberstein ME (2007) A natural history of web decorations in the St Andrew’s Cross spider (Argiope keyserlingi). Aust J Zool 55:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez MG, Wall E, Medina M (2003) Web orientation of the banded garden spider Argiope trifasciata (Araneae, Araneidae) in a California coastal population. J Arachnol 31:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riechert S, Gillespie RG (1986) Habitat choice and utilization in web-building spiders. In: Shear WA (ed) Spiders: Webs, behavior and evolution. Stanford University Press, Stanford. pp 23–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruxton GD, Hansell MH (2008) Why are pitfall traps so rare in the natural world? Evol Ecol. doi:10.1007/s10682-007-9218-0

  • Seah WK, Li DQ (2002) Stabilimentum variations in Argiope versicolor (Araneae: Araneidae) from Singapore. J Zool 258:531–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1984) The behavioural response race between predator and prey. Am Nat 123:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald JC, Coates MM, Wcislo WT, Warrant EJ (2007) Flight performance in night-flying sweat bees suffers at low light levels. J Exp Biol 210:4034–4042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tso IM, Liao CP, Huang RP, Yang EC (2006) Function of being colorful in web spiders: attracting prey or camouflaging oneself? Behav Ecol 17:606–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venner S, Casas J (2005) Spider webs designed for rare but life-saving catches. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:1587–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J, Wittmann D (1993) Landmark orientation during the approach to the nest in the stingless bee Trigona-(Tetragonisca)-angustula (Apidae, Meliponinae). Insectes Soc 40:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Russell and Janine Zabel for providing Trigona hives. Thanks to Diana Perez-Staples, Greg Holwell, David Nipperess and Jochen Zeil for help with the experiments and analysis. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for insightful comments and criticism that improved the manuscript. Funding was received from Macquarie University (to DR) and the Australian Research Council (to MEH and KC). The experiments comply with the current laws of the country in which they were performed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Dinesh Rao & Marie E. Herberstein

  2. Centre for the Integrative Study of Animal Behaviour, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia

    Ken Cheng

Authors
  1. Dinesh Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ken Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marie E. Herberstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dinesh Rao.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Beekman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, D., Cheng, K. & Herberstein, M.E. Stingless bee response to spider webs is dependent on the context of encounter. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 209–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0651-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0651-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation