Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Soil Bacterial Communities Under Diverse Agricultural Land Management and Crop Production Practices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The composition and structure of bacterial communities were examined in soil subjected to a range of diverse agricultural land management and crop production practices. Length heterogeneity polymerase chain reaction (LH-PCR) of bacterial DNA extracted from soil was used to generate amplicon profiles that were analyzed with univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Five land management programs were initiated in July 2000: conventional, organic, continuous removal of vegetation (disk fallow), undisturbed (weed fallow), and bahiagrass pasture (Paspalum notatum var Argentine). Similar levels in the diversity of bacterial 16S rDNA amplicons were detected in soil samples collected from organically and conventionally managed plots 3 and 4 years after initiation of land management programs, whereas significantly lower levels of diversity were observed in samples collected from bahiagrass pasture. Differences in diversity were attributed to effects on how the relative abundance of individual amplicons were distributed (evenness) and not on the total numbers of bacterial 16S rDNA amplicons detected (richness). Similar levels of diversity were detected among all land management programs in soil samples collected after successive years of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultivation. A different trend was observed after a multivariate examination of the similarities in genetic composition among soil bacterial communities. After 3 years of land management, similarities in genetic composition of soil bacterial communities were observed in plots where disturbance was minimized (bahiagrass and weed fallow). The genetic compositions in plots managed organically were similar to each other and distinct from bacterial communities in other land management programs. After successive years of tomato cultivation and damage from two major hurricanes, only the composition of soil bacterial communities within organically managed plots continued to maintain a high degree of similarity to each other and remain distinct from other bacterial communities. This study reveals the effects of agricultural land management practices on soil bacterial community composition and diversity in a large-scale, long-term replicated study where the effect of soil type on community attributes was removed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amann R, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 59:143–169

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bååth E (1996) Adaptation of soil bacterial communities to prevailing soil pH in different soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 19:227–237

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beauchamp EG, Hume DJ (1997) Agricultural soil manipulation: the use of bacteria, manuring and plowing. In: van Elsas JD, Trevors JT, Wellington EMH (Eds.) Modern Soil Microbiology, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, pp 643–664

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bending GD, Turner MK, Jones JE (2002) Interactions between crop residue and soil organic matter quality and the functional diversity of soil microbial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1073–1082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benizri E, Baudin E, Guckert A (2001) Root colonization by plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria. Biocontrol Sci Technol 5:557–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bossio DA, Scow KM (1998) Impacts of carbon and flooding on soil microbial communities: phospholipid fatty acid profiles and substrate utilization patterns. Microb Ecol 35:265–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bossio DA, Scow KM, Gunapala N, Graham KJ (1998) Determinants of soil microbial communities: effects of agricultural management, season and soil type on phospholipid fatty acid profiles. Microb Ecol 36:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Borneman J, Triplett E (1997) Molecular microbial diversity in soils from eastern Amazonia: evidence for unusual microorganisms and microbial population shifts associated with deforestation. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:2647–2653

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buckley DH, Schmidt TM (2001) The structure of microbial communities in soil and the lasting impact of cultivation. Microb Ecol 42:11–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bulluck LR, Ristaino JB (2002) Effect of synthetic and organic soil fertility amendments on southern blight soil microbial communities and yield of processing tomatoes. Phytopathology 92:181–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chellemi DO, Rhoads FM, Olson SM, Rich JR, Murray D, Murray G, Sylvia DM (1999) An alternative, low-input production system for fresh market tomatoes. Am J Altern Agric 14:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke KR, Green RH (1988) Statistical design and analysis for a ‘biological effects’ study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 46:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. Primer-E, Plymouth, UK

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clifford DHT, Stephenson W (1975) An introduction to numerical classification. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cole JA, Brown CM (1980) Nitrite reduction to ammonia by fermentative bacteria: a short circuit in the biological nitrogen cycle. FEMS Microbiol Lett 7:65–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, Clément C, Ait Barka E (2005) Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:4951–4959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Daffonchio D, Cherif A, Brusetti L, Rizzi A, Mora D, Boudabous A, Borin S (2003) Nature of polymorphisms in 16S-23S rRNA gene intergenic transcribed spacer fingerprinting of Bacillus and related genera. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5128–5137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. de Brito Alvarez MA, Gagne S, Antoun H (1995) Effect of compost on rhizosphere microflora of the tomato and on the incidence of plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:194–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Degens BP, Schipper LA, Sparling GP, Duncan LC (2001) Is the microbial community in a soil with reduced catabolic diversity less resistant to stress or disturbance? Soil Biol Biochem 33:1143–1153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Derry AM, Staddon WJ, Kevan PG, Trevors JT (1999) Functional diversity and community structure of micro-organisms in three arctic soils as determined by sole-carbon-source-utilization. Biodivers Conserv 8:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dollhopf SL, Hashsham SA, Tiedje J (2001) Interpreting 16S rDNA T-RFLP data: application of self-organizing maps and principal component analysis to describe community dynamics and convergence. Microb Ecol 42:495–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Drinkwater LE, Letourneau DK, Workneh F, van Bruggen AHC, Shennan C (1995) Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California. Ecol Appl 5:1098–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dunbar J, Takala S, Barns SM, Davis JA, Kuske CR (1999) Levels of bacterial community diversity in four arid soils compared by cultivation and 16S rRNA gene cloning. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1662–1669

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ellis RJ, Morgan P, Weightman AJ, Fry JC (2003) Cultivation-dependent and -independent approaches for determining bacterial diversity in heavy-metal-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:3223–3230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher MM, Triplett E (1999) Automated approach for ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of microbial diversity and its application to freshwater bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:4630–4636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fromin N, Hamelin J, Tarnawaski S, Roesti D, Jourdain-Miserez K, Forestier N, Teyssier-Cuvelle S, Gillet F, Aragno M, Rossi P (2002) Statistical analysis of denaturing gel electrophoresis (DGGE) fingerprinting patterns. Environ Microbiol 4:634–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gans J, Wolinsky M, Dunbar J (2005) Computational improvements reveal great bacterial diversity and high metal toxicity in soil. Science 309:1387–1389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Garbaye J (1994) Helper bacteria: a new dimension to the mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol 128:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Girvan MS, Bullimore J, Pretty JN, Osborn AM, Ball AS (2003) Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1800–1809

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gonzalez JM, Ortiz-Martinez A, Gonzalez-deIValle MA, Laiz L, Saiz-Jimenez C (2003) An efficient strategy for screening large cloned libraries of amplified 16S rDNA sequences from complex environmental communities. J Microbiol Methods 55:459–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorbushina AA, Krumbein WE (2005) Role of microorganisms in wear down of rocks and minerals. In: Buscot F, Varma A (Eds.) Microorganisms in Soils: Roles in Genesis and Functions, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 59–84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Graham JH, Hodge NC, Morton JB (1995) Fatty acid methyl ester profiles for characterization of Glomalean fungi and their endomycorrhizae. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:58–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Grüter D, Schmid B, Brandl H (2006) Influence of plant diversity and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levels on belowground bacterial diversity. BMC Microbiol 6:68–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Harder T, Lau SCK, Tam W-Y, Qian P-Y (2004) A bacterial culture-independent method to investigate chemically mediated control of bacterial epibiosis in marine invertebrates by using TRFLP analysis and natural bacterial populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 47:93–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hawkes CV, Wren IF, Herman DJ, Firestone MK (2005) Plant invasion alters nitrogen cycling by modifying the soil nitrifying community. Ecol Lett 8:976–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ibekwe AM, Kennedy AC (1998) Phospholipid fatty acid profiles and carbon utilization patterns for analysis of microbial community structure under field and greenhouse conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 26:151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Jamieson RC, Gordon RJ, Sharples KE, Stratton GW, Madani A (2002) Movement and persistence of fecal bacteria in agricultural soils and subsurface drainage water: a review. Can Biosyst Eng 44:1.1–1.9

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kandeler E, Stemmer M, Gerzabek MH (2005) Role of microorganisms in carbon cycling in soil. In: Buscot F, Varma A (Eds.) Microorganisms in Soils: Roles in Genesis and Functions, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 139–157

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaplan CW, Kitts CL (2003) Variation between observed and true Terminal Restriction Fragment Length is dependent on true TRF length and purine content. J Microbiol Methods 54:121–125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Kenkel NC, Orlóci L (1986) Applying metric and nonmetric multidimentional scaling studies: some new results. Ecology 67:918–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kent AD, Jones SE, Yannarell AC, Graham JM, Lauster GH, Kratz TK, Triplett EW (2004) Annual patterns in Bacterioplankton community variability in a humic lake. Microb Ecol 58:550–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirk JL, Beaudette LA, Hart M, Moutoglis P, Klironomos JN, Lee H, Trevors JT (2004) Methods of studying soil microbial diversity. J Microbiol Methods 58:169–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kruskal JB, Wish M (1978) Multidimensional scaling. Sage, Beverly Hills, California

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liu WT, Marsh TL, Cheng H, Forney LJ (1997) Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4516–4522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Lovely DR, Coates JD (1997) Bioremediation of metal contamination. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8:285–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lukow T, Dunfield PF, Liesack W (2000) Use of the T-RFLP technique to assess spatial and temporal changes in the bacterial community structure within an agricultural soil planted with transgenic and non-transgenic potato plants. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 32:241–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Lupwayi NZ, Rice WA, Clayton GW (1998) Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1733–1741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Mäder P, Fließbach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Marschner P, Rumberger A (2004) Rapid changes in the rhizosphere bacterial communities structure during re-colonization of sterilized soil. Biol Fertil Soils 40:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McCaig AE, Glover LA, Prosser JI (1999) Molecular analysis of bacterial community structure and diversity in unimproved and improved upland grass pastures. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1721–1730

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. McGarvey JA, Miller WJ, Sanchez S, Stanker L (2004) Identification of bacterial populations in dairy wastewaters by use of 16S rRNA gene sequences and other genetic markers. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4267–4275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mills DK, Fitzgerald K, Litchfield CD, Gillevet PM (2003) A comparison of DNA profiling techniques for monitoring nutrient impact on microbial community composition during bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils. J Microbiol Methods 54:57–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Müller AK, Westergaard K, Christensen S, Sørensen SJ (2002) The diversity and function of soil microbial communities exposed to different disturbances. Microb Ecol 44:49–58

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. National Organic Program Standards (2006) National Organic Program Standards, 2006. http://www.ams.usda.gov/nop/NOP/standards.html

  57. Øvreås L, Torsvik V (1998) Microbial diversity and community structure in two different agricultural soil communities. Microb Ecol 36:303–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Powell SA, Bowman JP, Snape I, Stark JS (2003) Microbial community variation in pristine and polluted nearshore Antarctic sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 45:135–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ranjard L, Brothier E, Nazaret S (2000) Sequencing bands of RISA fingerprints for the characterization and the microscale distribution of soil bacterial populations responding to mercury spiking. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5334–5339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ranjard L, Poly F, Lata J-C, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Nazaret S (2001) Characterization of bacterial and fungal soil communities by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis fingerprints: biological and methodological variability. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4479–4487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rees GN, Baldwin DS, Watson GO, Perryman S, Nielson DL (2004) Ordination and significance testing of microbial community composition derived from terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms: application of multivariate statistics. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 86:339–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Rich JJ, Myrold DD (2004) Community composition and activities of denitrifying bacteria from adjacent agricultural soil, riparian soil, and creek sediment in Oregon, USA. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1431–1441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Ridge EH (1976) Studies of soil fumigation—II Effects on bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem 8:249–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Ritchie NJ, Schutter ME, Dick RP, Myrold DD (2000) Use of length heterogeneity PCR and fatty acid methyl ester profiles to characterize microbial communities in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1668–1675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Saison C, Degrange V, Oliver R, Millard P, Commeaux C, Montange D, Roux XL (2006) Alternation and resilience of the soil microbial community following compost amendment: effects of compost level and compost-borne microbial community. Environ Microbiol 8:247–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Schutter ME, Sandeno JM, Dick RP (2004) Seasonal, soil type, and alternative management influences on microbial communities of vegetable cropping systems. Biol Fertil Soils 34:397–410

    Google Scholar 

  67. Steenwerth KL, Jackson LE, Calderón FJ, Stromberg MR, Scow KM (2003) Soil microbial community composition and land use history in cultivated and grassland ecosystems of coastal California. Soil Biol Biochem 35:489–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Stephan A, Meyer AH, Schmid B (2000) Plant diversity affects culturable soil bacteria in experimental grassland communities. J Ecol 88:988–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sturz AV, Nowak J (2000) Endophytic communities of rhizobacteria and the strategies to create yield enhancing associations with crops. Appl Soil Ecol 15:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Suzuki M, Rappe S, Giovannoni SJ (1998) Kinetic bias in estimates of coastal picoplankton community structure obtained by measurements of small-subunit rRNA gene PCR amplicon length heterogeneity. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4522–4529

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (1983) Using multivariate statistics. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  72. Thorndike RM (1978) Correlation procedures for research. Gardner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  73. Tiirola MA, Suvilampi JE, Kulomaa MS, Rintala JA (2003) Microbial diversity in a thermophilic aerobic biofilm process: analysis by length heterogeneity PCR (LH-PCR). Water Res 37:2259–2268

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Tisdall JM, Cockroft B, Uren NC (1978) The stability of soil aggregates as affected by organic materials, microbial activity and physical disruption. Aust J Soil Res 10:9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tom-Petersen A, Leser TD, Marsh TL, Nybroe O (2003) Effects of copper amendment on the bacterial community in agricultural soil analysed by the T-RFLP technique. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 46:53–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Torsvik VL, Goksøyr J (1978) Determination of bacterial DNA in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 10:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Torsvik V, Goksøyr J, Daae FL (1990) High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:782–787

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Van Diepeningen AD, de Vos OJ, Korthal GW, van Bruggen AHC (2006) Effects of organic versus conventional management on chemical and biological parameters in soils. Appl Soil Ecol 31:120–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Vestal JR, White DC (1989) Lipid analysis in microbial ecology. BioScience 39:535–541

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Waldrop MP, Balser TC, Firestone MK (2000) Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1837–1846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ed Killer, Larry Markle, and Len Therrien for their work on the field experiments and George Ingram for help with soil DNA extraction. We also thank Phat Dang and Laura Boykin for their assistance in the cloning and sequencing analysis, and three anonymous reviewers for their editorial comments on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiehang Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, T., Chellemi, D.O., Graham, J.H. et al. Comparison of Soil Bacterial Communities Under Diverse Agricultural Land Management and Crop Production Practices. Microb Ecol 55, 293–310 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9276-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-007-9276-4

Keywords

Navigation