Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MRI of the liver—how to do it

  • Review
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article details indications, patient preparation, pulse sequences/protocols, and contrast agents for pediatric hepatobiliary MRI. When performed well, MRI provides superior diagnostic information relative to CT for evaluation of hepatic tumors, liver transplants, and biliary disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Finn JP, Hall-Craggs MA, Dicks-Mireaux C et al (1990) Primary malignant liver tumors in childhood: assessment of resectability with high-field MR and comparison with CT. Pediatr Radiol 21:34–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Kroeker MA et al (1992) Focal liver disease: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and T2-weighted fat-suppressed, FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 184:687–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinreb JC, Cohen JM, Armstrong E et al (1986) Imaging the pediatric liver: MRI and CT. Am J Roentgenol 147:785–790

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roebuck DJ, Aronson D, Clapuyt P et al (2007) 2005 PRETEXT: a revised staging system for primary malignant liver tumours of childhood developed by the SIOPEL group. Pediatr Radiol 37:123–132, quiz 149–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roebuck DJ, Olsen O, Pariente D (2006) Radiological staging in children with hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Radiol 36:176–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arcement CM, Meza MP, Arumanla S et al (2001) MRCP in the evaluation of pancreaticobiliary disease in children. Pediatr Radiol 31:92–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Delaney L, Applegate KE, Karmazyn B et al (2008) MR cholangiopancreatography in children: feasibility, safety, and initial experience. Pediatr Radiol 38:64–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chavhan GB, Roberts E, Moineddin R et al (2008) Primary sclerosing cholangitis in children: utility of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Pediatr Radiol 38:868–873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrara C, Valeri G, Salvolini L et al (2002) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in primary sclerosing cholangitis in children. Pediatr Radiol 32:413–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamada Y, Tanano A, Takada K et al (2004) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography on postoperative work-up in children with choledochal cysts. Pediatr Surg Int 20:43–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Irie H, Honda H, Jimi M et al (1998) Value of MR cholangiopancreatography in evaluating choledochal cysts. Am J Roentgenol 171:1381–1385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim MJ, Han SJ, Yoon CS et al (2002) Using MR cholangiopancreatography to reveal anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union in infants and children with choledochal cysts. Am J Roentgenol 179:209–214

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krause D, Cercueil JP, Dranssart M et al (2002) MRI for evaluating congenital bile duct abnormalities. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:541–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fishbein M, Castro F, Cheruku S et al (2005) Hepatic MRI for fat quantitation: its relationship to fat morphology, diagnosis, and ultrasound. J Clin Gastroenterol 39:619–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fishbein MH, Gardner KG, Potter CJ et al (1997) Introduction of fast MR imaging in the assessment of hepatic steatosis. Magn Reson Imaging 15:287–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Qayyum A, Goh JS, Kakar S et al (2005) Accuracy of liver fat quantification at MR imaging: comparison of out-of-phase gradient-echo and fat-saturated fast spin-echo techniques—initial experience. Radiology 237:507–511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ et al (2007) Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(1207–1213):e1202

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fujita T, Ito K, Honjo K et al (2002) Hepatic parenchymal enhancement in the cirrhotic liver: evaluation by triple-phase dynamic MRI. Abdom Imaging 27:29–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JK, Dixon WT, Ling D et al (1984) Fatty infiltration of the liver: demonstration by proton spectroscopic imaging. Preliminary observations. Radiology 153:195–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wood JC, Enriquez C, Ghugre N et al (2005) MRI R2 and R2* mapping accurately estimates hepatic iron concentration in transfusion-dependent thalassemia and sickle cell disease patients. Blood 106:1460–1465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dagia C, Ditchfield M (2008) 3 T MRI in paediatrics: challenges and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 68:309–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schindera ST, Merkle EM, Dale BM et al (2006) Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio? Acad Radiol 13:1236–1243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Runge VM, Clanton JA, Partain CL et al (1984) Respiratory gating in magnetic resonance imaging at 0.5 Tesla. Radiology 151:521–523

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim BS, Kim JH, Choi GM et al (2008) Comparison of three free-breathing T2-weighted MRI sequences in the evaluation of focal liver lesions. Am J Roentgenol 190:W19–W27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klessen C, Asbach P, Kroencke TJ et al (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence with navigator triggered prospective acquisition correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SS, Byun JH, Hong HS et al (2007) Image quality and focal lesion detection on T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver: comparison of two high-resolution free-breathing imaging techniques with two breath-hold imaging techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:323–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Busse RF, Hariharan H, Vu A et al (2006) Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 55:1030–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hennig J, Weigel M, Scheffler K (2003) Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS). Magn Reson Med 49:527–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kijowski R, Davis KW, Woods MA et al (2009) Knee joint: comprehensive assessment with 3D isotropic resolution fast spin-echo MR imaging—diagnostic performance compared with that of conventional MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 252:486–495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mugler JPK, Brookeman JR (2000) Three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging of the brain using very long spin-echo trains. International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 8th Meeting, Denver, CO, p 687

  31. Nandalur KR, Hussain HK, Weadock WJ et al (2008) Possible biliary disease: diagnostic performance of high-spatial-resolution isotropic 3D T2-weighted MRCP. Radiology 249:883–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Miyazaki T, Yamashita Y, Tang Y et al (1998) Single-shot MR cholangiopancreatography of neonates, infants, and young children. Am J Roentgenol 170:33–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Carlos RC, Branam JD, Dong Q et al (2002) Biliary imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA: is a 20-minute delay sufficient? Acad Radiol 9:1322–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Koelblinger C, Schima W, Weber M et al (2009) Gadoxate-enhanced T1-weighted MR cholangiography: comparison of 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Rofo 181:587–592

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee NK, Kim S, Lee JW et al (2009) Biliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and its clinical applications. Radiographics 29:1707–1724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Seale MK, Catalano OA, Saini S et al (2009) Hepatobiliary-specific MR contrast agents: role in imaging the liver and biliary tree. Radiographics 29:1725–1748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Takao H, Akai H, Tajima T et al (2009) MR imaging of the biliary tract with Gd-EOB-DTPA: effect of liver function on signal intensity. Eur J Radiol Aug 31 [Epub ahead of print]

  38. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB et al (2007) Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs. CE-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:966–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Katoh M, Buecker A, Stuber M et al (2004) Free-breathing renal MR angiography with steady-state free-precession (SSFP) and slab-selective spin inversion: initial results. Kidney Int 66:1272–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital, Stanford University School of Medicine, 725 Welch Road Rm. 1681, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

    Shreyas S. Vasanawala

Authors
  1. Shreyas S. Vasanawala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shreyas S. Vasanawala.

Additional information

Dr. Vasanawala has indicated that he has no relevant financial relationships or potential conflicts of interest related to the material presented.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vasanawala, S.S. MRI of the liver—how to do it. Pediatr Radiol 40, 431–437 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1522-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1522-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation