Skip to main content
Log in

Optimized Multisite Ventricular Pacing in Postoperative Single-Ventricle Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ventricular dyssynchrony is associated with morbidity and mortality after palliation of a single ventricle. The authors hypothesized that resynchronization with optimized temporary multisite pacing postoperatively would be safe, feasible, and effective. Pacing was assessed in the intensive care unit within the first 24 h after surgery. Two unipolar atrial pacing leads and four bipolar ventricular pacing leads were placed at standardized sites intraoperatively. Pacing was optimized to maximize mean arterial pressure. The protocol tested 11 combinations of the 4 different ventricular lead sites, 6 atrioventricular delays (50–150 ms), and 14 intraventricular delays. Optimal pacing settings were thus determined and ultimately compared in four configurations: bipolar, unipolar, single-site atrioventricular pacing, and intrinsic rhythm. Each patient was his or her own control, and all pacing comparisons were implemented in random sequence. Single-ventricle palliation was performed for 17 children ages 0–21 years. Pacing increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) versus intrinsic rhythm, with the following configurations: bipolar multisite pacing increased MAP by 2.2 % (67.7 ± 2.4 to 69.2 ± 2.4 mmHg; p = 0.013) and unipolar multisite pacing increased MAP by 2.8 % (67.7 ± 2.4 to 69.6 ± 2.7 mmHg; p = 0.002). Atrioventricular single-site pacing increased MAP by 2.1 % (67.7 ± 2.4 to 69.1 ± 2.5 mmHg: p = 0.02, insignificant difference under Bonferroni correction). The echocardiographic fractional area change in nine patients increased significantly only with unipolar pacing (32 ± 3.1 to 36 ± 4.2 %; p = 0.02). No study-related adverse events occurred. Multisite pacing optimization is safe and feasible in the early postoperative period after single-ventricle palliation, with improvements in mean arterial pressure and fractional area shortening. Further study to evaluate clinical benefits is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL et al (2002) Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 346:1845–1853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bacha EA, Zimmerman FJ, Mor-Avi V et al (2004) Ventricular resynchronization by multisite pacing improves myocardial performance in the postoperative single-ventricle patient. Ann Thorac Surg 78:1678–1683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaca AM, Jaggers JJ, Dudley LT et al (2008) Repair of congenital heart disease: a primer–part 1. Radiology 247:617–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garofalo CA, Cabreriza SE, Quinn TA et al (2006) Ventricular diastolic stiffness predicts perioperative morbidity and duration of pleural effusions after the Fontan operation. Circulation 114:156–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hershenson JA, Zaidi AN, Texter KM et al (2010) Differences in tissue Doppler imaging between single ventricles after the Fontan operation and normal controls. Am J Cardiol 106:99–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Janousek J, Vojtovic P, Hucin B et al (2001) Resynchronization pacing is a useful adjunct to the management of acute heart failure after surgery for congenital heart defects. Am J Cardiol 88:145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson CK, Cabreriza SE, Sahar RL et al (2012) Clinical validation of a real-time data processing system for cardiac output and arterial pressure measurement during intraoperative biventricular pacing optimization. ASAIO J 58:191–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leon AR, Abraham WT, Brozena S et al (2005) Cardiac resynchronization with sequential biventricular pacing for the treatment of moderate-to-severe heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:2298–2304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Moiduddin N, Texter KM, Zaidi AN et al (2010) Two-dimensional speckle strain and dyssynchrony in single right ventricles versus normal right ventricles. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:673–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson GS, Berger RD, Fetics BJ et al (2000) Left ventricular or biventricular pacing improves cardiac function at diminished energy cost in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block. Circulation 102:3053–3059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen H, Havalad V, Wang DY et al (2013) Temporary biventricular pacing decreases the vasoactive-inotropic score after cardiac surgery: a substudy of a randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 146:296–301

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pham PP, Balaji S, Shen I et al (2005) Impact of conventional versus biventricular pacing on hemodynamics and tissue Doppler imaging indexes of resynchronization postoperatively in children with congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:2284–2289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prasso JE, Berberian G, Cabreriza SE et al (2005) Validation of mean arterial pressure as an indicator of acute changes in cardiac output. ASAIO J 51:22–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinstein BJ, Wang DY, Cabreriza SE et al (2012) Response of mean arterial pressure to temporary biventricular pacing after chest closure during cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:1445–1452

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J et al (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:685–713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Salukhe TV, Francis DP, Clague JR, Sutton R, Poole-Wilson P, Henein MY (2005) Chronic heart failure patients with restrictive LV filling pattern have significantly less benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy than patients with late LV filling pattern. Int J Cardiol 100:5–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang DY, Richmond ME, Quinn TA et al (2010) Optimized temporary biventricular pacing acutely improves intraoperative cardiac output after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass: a substudy of a clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 141:1002–1008

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zimmerman FJ, Starr JP, Koenig PR, Smith P, Hijazi ZM, Bacha EA (2003) Acute hemodynamic benefit of multisite ventricular pacing after congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 75:1775–1780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the contributions of Jonathan Chen, Alexandra Murata, Max Cohen, and Bryan Velez De Villa. This study was funded by a Columbia University Department of Surgery startup Grant. Dr. Spotnitz is the George H. Humphreys, II, Professor of Surgery.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinod Havalad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Havalad, V., Cabreriza, S.E., Cheung, E.W. et al. Optimized Multisite Ventricular Pacing in Postoperative Single-Ventricle Patients. Pediatr Cardiol 35, 1213–1219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-0918-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-0918-2

Keywords

Navigation