Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Increased renal papillary density in kidney stone formers detectable by CT scan is a potential marker of stone risk, but is unrelated to underlying hypercalciuria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several previous studies have reported an increase in Hounsfield unit density of the renal papillae in patients with nephrolithiasis compared with controls. Kidney stone formers (KSF) were found to have higher papillary and cortical density in both kidneys, irrespective of which side had calculi, and it was proposed that this might be related to the presence of underlying hypercalciuria. The current study was designed: (1) to determine whether recurrent KSF do have higher papillary density compared with healthy controls; (2) to test an association between higher renal papillary density and the presence of hypercalciuria in KSF. This retrospective case-matched controlled study was carried out at the Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. We investigated 111 patients, 57 of whom were KSF and 54 healthy controls. The CT attenuation values were measured within a 0.2 cm2 area of the renal papilla in the upper, middle, and lower segments of each kidney, and were compared between KSF and non-stone formers, and between KSF with and without hypercalciuria. There were no significant differences in age and sex between groups. Papillary density was significantly higher in KSF by both crude and adjusted analyses (p < 0.001). However, there was no association between higher papillary density and hypercalciuria in KSF. The papillary density measured by CT is a useful, non-invasive tool to differentiate between KSF and healthy controls. The absence of any correlation between papillary density and hypercalciuria suggests that the presence of clinically significant underlying renal stone disease, rather than urinary metabolic abnormalities, correlates with radiologically detectable increased papillary density.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Evan AP, Unwin RJ, Williams JC (2011) Renal stone disease: a commentary on the nature and significance of Randall’s plaque. Nephron Physiol 119(4):49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Evan A, Lingeman J, Coe FL, Worcester E (2006) Randall’s plaque: pathogenesis and role in calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 69:1313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bhuskute NM, Yap WW, Wah TM (2009) A retrospective evaluation of Randall’s plaque theory of nephrolithiasis with CT attenuation values. Eur J Radiol 72(3):470–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisner BH, Iqbal A, Namasivayam S, Catalano O, Kambadakone A, Dretler SP et al (2008) Differences in computed tomography density of the renal papillae of stone formers and non-stone-formers: a pilot study. J Endourol 22(10):2207–2210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baran I, Voyvoda N, Tokgöz Ö, Tokgöz H (2012) Can Hounsfield unit values of the cortex and papillae determined by computed tomography demonstrate the possibility of kidney stone formation? Eur J Radiol 81(7):1446–1449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ciudin A, Luque MP, Salvador R, Diaconu MG, Franco A, Collado-Belvis A et al (2014) The evolution of CT diagnosed papillae tip microcalcifications: can we predict the development of stones? J Endourol 28(8):1016–1021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ciudin A, Luque MP, Salvador R, Diaconu MG, Franco A, Constantin V et al (2013) Abdominal computed tomography–a new tool for predicting recurrent stone disease. J Endourol 27(8):965–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ciudin A, Luque Galvez MP, Salvador Izquierdo R, Diaconu MG, de Castro AF, Constantin V et al (2013) Validation of Randall’s plaque theory using unenhanced abdominal computed tomography. Urology 81(2):246–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Linnes MP, Krambeck AE, Cornell L, Williams JC Jr, Korinek M, Bergstralh EJ et al (2013) Phenotypic characterization of kidney stone formers by endoscopic and histological quantification of intrarenal calcification. Kidney Int 84(4):818–825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. MacIsaac R, Panagiotopoulos S, McNeil K, Smith T, Tsalamandris C, Hao H et al (2006) Is nonalbuminuric renal insufficiency in type 2 diabetes related to an increase in intrarenal vascular disease? Diabet Care 29:1560–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. MacIsaac RJ, Thomas MC, Panagiotopoulos S, Smith TJ, Hao H, Matthews DG et al (2008) Association between intrarenal arterial resistance and diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Cardiovasc Diabetol 23(7):15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McCarty MF, DiNicolantonio JJ (2014) The molecular biology and pathophysiology of vascular calcification. Postgrad Med 126(2):54–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UCL Centre for Nephrology, Royal Free Campus and Hospital, University College London Medical School, London, UK

    Linda Shavit, Daniela Girfoglio, Shabbir Moochhala & Robert Unwin

  2. Adult Nephrology Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, PO Box 3235, Jerusalem, 91031, Israel

    Linda Shavit

  3. UCL Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London Medical School, London, UK

    Alex Kirkham

  4. Urology Department, University College London Medical School, London, UK

    Darrell Allen

  5. Division of Nephrology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy

    Pietro Manuel Ferraro

Authors
  1. Linda Shavit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniela Girfoglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alex Kirkham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Darrell Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pietro Manuel Ferraro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shabbir Moochhala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Robert Unwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Shavit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest.

Disclosure

We declare that the manuscript is original research, has not been previously published and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere while under consideration. It has been seen and approved by all authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shavit, L., Girfoglio, D., Kirkham, A. et al. Increased renal papillary density in kidney stone formers detectable by CT scan is a potential marker of stone risk, but is unrelated to underlying hypercalciuria. Urolithiasis 44, 471–475 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0873-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-016-0873-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation