Abstract
Canopy-forming seaweeds are important foundation species or ecosystem engineers in intertidal habitats. By limiting a variety of abiotic stresses during low tides, algal canopies improve the performance of many understory organisms. The reduction of heat stress through substrate shading and moisture retention has received considerable attention in marine biology. However, the thermal influence of canopies during winter has not been empirically evaluated. Using intertidal fucoid canopies (Ascophyllum nodosum) from Atlantic Canada, we did a field experiment contrasting canopy-covered and no-canopy areas to test the hypothesis that canopies limit low temperatures during winter low tides. During 35 days between January and March, mid-intertidal temperature was often negative near the time of the lowest daily tides, on average more than 1 °C lower on bare substrate than under full canopy cover. The difference between both canopy treatments was higher around spring tides than around neap tides. Temperature on bare substrate was once even up to 10 °C lower than under a full canopy. Previous studies have shown that single occurrences of lethal negative temperatures and frequent occurrences of sublethal temperatures kill intertidal organisms every winter. Thus, our study suggests that, in addition to their bioprotective role during summer, canopy-forming seaweeds might also play a relevant facilitative role during winter.
References
Adey WH, Hayek LC (2005) The biogeographic structure of the western North Atlantic rocky intertidal. Cryptogam Algologie 26:35–66
Altieri AH, van de Koppel J (2014) Foundation species in marine ecosystems. In: Bertness MD, Bruno JF, Silliman BR, Stachowicz JJ (eds) Marine community ecology and conservation. Sinauer, Sunderland, pp 37–56
Anderson DR (2008) Model-based inference in the life sciences: a primer on evidence. Springer, New York
Ansart A, Vernon P (2003) Cold hardiness in molluscs. Acta Oecol 24:95–102
Beermann AJ, Ellrich JA, Molis M, Scrosati RA (2013) Effects of seaweed canopies and adult barnacles on barnacle recruitment: the interplay of positive and negative influences. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 448:162–170
Bertness MD, Leonard GH, Levine JM, Schmidt PR, Ingraham AO (1999) Testing the relative contribution of positive and negative interactions in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 80:2711–2726
Bourget E (1983) Seasonal variations of cold tolerance in intertidal mollusks and relation to environmental conditions in the St. Lawrence Estuary. Can J Zool 61:1193–1201
Braby CE (2007) Cold stress. In: Denny MW, Gaines SD (eds) Encyclopedia of tidepools and rocky shores. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 148–150
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2004) Multimodel inference. Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociol Methods Res 33:261–304
Collén J, Davison IR (1999) Reactive oxygen production and damage in intertidal Fucus spp. (Phaeophyceae). J Phycol 35:54–61
Coombes MA, Viles HA, Naylor LA, La Marca EC (2017) Cool barnacles: do common biogenic structures enhance or retard rates of deterioration of intertidal rocks and concrete? Sci Total Environ 580:1034–1045
Core Team R (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Dudgeon SR, Davison IR, Vadas RL (1990) Freezing tolerance in the intertidal red algae Chondrus crispus and Mastocarpus stellatus: relative importance of acclimation and adaptation. Mar Biol 106:427–436
Government of Canada (2018) Environment and natural resources. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment.html. Accessed 18 June 2018
Harley CDG (2011) Climate change, keystone predation, and biodiversity loss. Science 334:1124–1127
Hunt HL, Scheibling RE (2001) Patch dynamics of mussels on rocky shores: integrating process to understand pattern. Ecology 82:3213–3231
Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386
Loomis SH (1995) Freezing tolerance of marine invertebrates. Oceanogr Mar Biol 33:337–350
McCook LJ, Chapman ARO (1991) Community succession following massive ice scour on an exposed rocky shore: effects of Fucus canopy algae and mussels during late succession. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 154:131–169
Morley JW, Batt RD, Pinsky ML (2017) Marine assemblages respond rapidly to winter climate variability. Global Change Biol 23:2590–2601
Mota CF, Engelen AH, Serrão EA, Pearson GA (2015) Some don’t like it hot: microhabitat-dependent thermal and water stresses in a trailing edge population. Funct Ecol 29:640–649
Murphy DJ, Johnson LC (1980) Physical and temporal factors influencing the freezing tolerance of the marine snail Littorina littorea (L.). Biol Bull 158:220–232
Pomeroy JW, Brun E (2001) Physical properties of snow. In: Jones HG, Pomeroy JW, Walker DA, Hoham RW (eds) Snow ecology. An interdisciplinary examination of snow-covered ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–126
Roland W, Ring RA (1977) Cold, freezing, and desiccation tolerance of the limpet Acmaea digitalis (Eschscholtz). Cryobiology 14:228–235
Scrosati RA (2011) Subarctic shores without an ice foot: low extremes in intertidal temperature during winter. Curr Dev Oceanogr 3:153–160
Scrosati R, Eckersley LK (2007) Thermal insulation of the intertidal zone by the ice foot. J Sea Res 58:331–334
Somero G (2007) Heat stress. In: Denny MW, Gaines SD (eds) Encyclopedia of tidepools and rocky shores. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 266–270
Tide and Current Predictor (2018) Tidal height and current site selection. http://tbone.biol.sc.edu/tide/index.html. Accessed 18 June 2018
Umanzor S, Ladah L, Calderón-Aguilera LE, Zertuche-González JA (2017) Intertidal macroalgae influence macroinvertebrate distribution across stress scenarios. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 584:67–77
Watt CA, Scrosati RA (2013) Bioengineer effects on understory species richness, diversity, and composition change along an environmental stress gradient: experimental and mensurative evidence. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 123:10–18
Zuur AF, Hilbe JM, Ieno EN (2013) A beginner’s guide to GLM and GLMM with R: a frequentist and Bayesian perspective for ecologists. Highland Statistics, Newburgh
Acknowledgements
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Funding
This project was funded by grants awarded to Ricardo A. Scrosati by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant #311624), the Canada Foundation for Innovation (Leaders Opportunity Grant #202034), and the Canada Research Chairs program (CRC Grant #210283) and by a postdoctoral fellowship (#91617093) awarded to Julius A. Ellrich by the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: F. Bulleri.
Reviewed by Undisclosed experts.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scrosati, R.A., Ellrich, J.A. Thermal moderation of the intertidal zone by seaweed canopies in winter. Mar Biol 165, 115 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3374-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-018-3374-3