Abstract
Cognitive resource theory is a common explanation for both the performance decline in vigilance tasks, known as the vigilance decrement, and the limited ability to perform multiple tasks simultaneously. The limited supply of cognitive resources may be utilized faster than they are replenished resulting in a performance decrement, or may need to be allocated among multiple tasks with some performance cost. Researchers have proposed both domain-specific, for example spatial versus verbal processing resources, and domain general cognitive resources. One challenge in testing the domain specificity of cognitive resources in vigilance is the current lack of difficult semantic vigilance tasks which reliably produce a decrement. In the present research, we investigated whether the vigilance decrement was found in a new abbreviated semantic discrimination vigilance task, and whether there was a performance decrement in said vigilance task when paired with a word recall task, as opposed to performed individually. As hypothesized, a vigilance decrement in the semantic vigilance task was found in both the single-task and dual-task conditions, along with reduced vigilance performance in the dual-task condition and reduced word recall in the dual-task condition. This is consistent with cognitive resource theory. The abbreviated semantic vigilance task will be a useful tool for researchers interested in determining the specificity of cognitive resources utilized in vigilance tasks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ariga A, Lleras A (2011) Brief and rare mental “breaks” keep you focused: deactivation and reactivation of task goals preempt vigilance decrements. Cognition 118(3):439–443
Caggiano DM, Parasuraman R (2004) The role of memory representation in the vigilance decrement. Psychon B Rev 11(5):932–937
Chen Z, Cowan N (2009) How verbal memory loads consume attention. Mem Cognit 37:829–836
Cowan N (1995) Attention and memory: an integrated framework. Oxford University Press, New York
Darling KA, Helton WS (2014) Dual-task interference between climbing and a simulated communication task. Exp Brain Res 232(4):1367–1377
Deaton JE, Parasuraman R (1993) Sensory and cognitive vigilance: effects of age on performance and subjective workload. Hum Perform 6(1):71–97
Fernandez-Duque D, Posner MI (2001) Brain imaging of attentional networks in normal and pathological states. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 23(1):74–93
Green AL, Helton WS (2011) Dual-task performance during a climbing traverse. Exp Brain Res 215(3–4):307–313
Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of the NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of experimental and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland Press, Amsterdam, pp 139–183
Hautus MJ (1995) Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behav Res Methods Instrum 27(1):46–51
Head J, Helton WS (2012) Natural scene stimuli and lapses of sustained attention. Conscious Cogn 21(4):1617–1625
Head J, Helton WS (2014) Sustained attention failures are primarily due to sustained cognitive load not task monotony. Acta Psychol 153:87–94
Head J, Russell PN, Dorahy MJ, Neumann E, Helton WS (2012) Text-speak processing and the sustained attention to response task. Exp Brain Res 216(1):103–111
Helton WS, Russell PN (2011) Feature absence–presence and two theories of lapses of sustained attention. Psychol Res 75(5):384–392
Helton WS, Russell PN (2012) Brief mental breaks and content-free cues may not keep you focused. Exp Brain Res 219(1):37–46
Helton WS, Russell PN (2013) Visuospatial and verbal working memory load: effects on visuospatial vigilance. Exp Brain Res 224:429–436
Helton WS, Russell PN (2015) Rest is best: the role of rest and task interruptions on vigilance. Cognition 134:165–173
Helton WS, Warm JS (2008) Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance. Acta Psychol 129(1):18–25
Kurzban R, Duckworth A, Kable JW, Myers J (2013) An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. Behav Brain Sci 36(06):661–679
Langner R, Eickhoff SB (2013) Sustaining attention to simple tasks: a meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychol Bull 139(4):870
Langner R, Willmes K, Chatterjee A, Eickhoff SB, Sturm W (2010) Energetic effects of stimulus intensity on prolonged simple reaction-time performance. Psychol Res 74(5):499–512
Lim J, Wu WC, Wang J, Detre JA, Dinges DF, Rao H (2010) Imaging brain fatigue from sustained mental workload: an ASL perfusion study of the time-on-task effect. Neuroimage 49(4):3426–3435
Lim J, Quevenco FC, Kwok K (2013) EEG alpha activity is associated with individual differences in post-break improvement. Neuroimage 76:81–89
Mackworth NH (1948) The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Q J Exp Psychol 1(1):6–21
Paivio A, Yuille JC, Madigan SA (1968) Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. J Exp Psychol 76:21–25
Parasuraman R (1979) Memory load and event rate control sensitivity decrements in sustained attention. Science 205:924–927
Parasuraman R, Mouloua M (1987) Interaction of signal discriminability and task type in vigilance decrement. Percept Psychophys 41(1):17–22
Ross HA, Russell PN, Helton WS (2014) Effects of breaks and goal switches on the vigilance decrement. Exp Brain Res 232(6):1729–1737
Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-Prime user’s guide. Psychology Software Tools Inc., Pittsburgh
Shaw TH, Satterfield K, Ramirez R, Finomore V (2013) Using cerebral hemovelocity to measure workload during a spatialised auditory vigilance task in novice and experienced observers. Ergonomics 56(8):1251–1263
Simon HA (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge
Szalma JL, Warm JS, Matthews G, Dember WN, Weiler EM, Meier A, Eggemeier FT (2004) Effects of sensory modality and task duration on performance, workload, and stress in sustained attention. Hum Factors 46(2):219–233
Temple JG, Warm JS, Dember WN, Jones KS, LaGrange CM, Matthews G (2000) The effects of signal salience and caffeine on performance, workload, and stress in an abbreviated vigilance task. Hum Factors 42(2):183–194
Thomson DR, Besner D, Smilek D (2015a) A resource-control account of sustained attention evidence from mind-wandering and vigilance paradigms. Perspect Psychol Sci 10(1):82–96
Thomson DR, Smilek D, Besner D (2015b) Reducing the vigilance decrement: the effects of perceptual variability. Conscious Cogn 33:386–397
Wickens CD (2008) Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors 50:449–455
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Appendix
Appendix
Word recall list 1
Ankle, banner, bullet, cowhide, doorman, hostage, icebox, infant, leopard, locker, missile, monarch, mucous, piano, pudding, saloon, slipper, sulfur, sunburn, thicket.
Word recall list 2
Bandit, blister, butcher, fabric, fiord, harness, jelly, lobster, morgue, nectar, pepper, piston, rattle, reptile, salad, settler, singer, sultan, trumpet, typhoon.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Epling, S.L., Russell, P.N. & Helton, W.S. A new semantic vigilance task: vigilance decrement, workload, and sensitivity to dual-task costs. Exp Brain Res 234, 133–139 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4444-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4444-0