Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Graspability” of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When grasping an object, our gaze marks key positions to which the fingertips are directed. In contrast, eye fixations during perceptual tasks are typically concentrated on an object’s centre of mass (COM). However, previous studies have typically required subjects to either grasp the object at predetermined sites or just look at computer-generated shapes “as a whole”. In the current study, we investigated gaze fixations during a reaching and grasping task to symmetrical objects and compared these fixations with those made during a perceptual size estimation task using real (Experiment 1) and computer-generated objects (Experiment 2). Our results demonstrated similar gaze patterns in both perception and action to real objects. Participants first fixated a location towards the top edge of the object, consistent with index finger location during grasping, followed by a subsequent fixation towards the object’s COM. In contrast, during the perceptual task to computer-generated objects, an opposite pattern in fixation locations was observed, where first fixations were closer to the COM, followed by a subsequent fixation towards the top edge. Even though differential fixation patterns were observed between studies, the area in which these fixations occurred, between the centre of the object and top edge, was the same in all tasks. These results demonstrate for the first time consistencies in fixation locations across both perception and action tasks, particularly when the same type of information (e.g. object size) is important for the completion of both tasks, with fixation locations increasing relative to the object’s COM with increases in block height.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams RA, Meyer DE, Kornblum S (1990) Eye-hand coordination: oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 16(2):248–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkering H, Adam JJ, Kingma H, Huson A, Whiting HT (1994) Reaction time latencies of eye and hand movements in single- and dual-task conditions. Exp Brain Res 97(3):471–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman I, Mezzanotte RJ, Rabinowitz JC (1982) Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cogn Psychol 14(2):143–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers D, Heilman KM (1980) Pseudoneglect: effects of hemispace on a tactile line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 18(4–5):491–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer AM, Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR (2009) Differences in fixations between grasping and viewing objects. J Vision 9(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • de Grave DDJ, Hesse C, Brouwer AM, Franz VH (2008) Fixation locations when grasping partly occluded objects. J Vision 8(7):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Greef T, Lafeber H, van Oostendorp H, Lindenberg J (2009) Eye movement as indicators of mental workload to trigger adaptive automation. Lecture notes Comput Sci (LNCS) 5638:219–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desanghere L, Marotta JJ (2008) Eye movements and visuomotor behaviour: what are you looking at!?!. J Vision 8(6):299a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deubel H, Schneider WX, Paprotta I (1998) Selective dorsal and ventral processing: evidence for a common attentional mechanism in reaching and perception. Vis Cogn 5:81–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkerman HC, McIntosh RD, Schindler I, Nijboer TCW, Milner AD (2009) Choosing between alternative wrist postures: action planning needs perception. Neuropsychologia 47(6):1476–1482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Efron R (1968) What is perception?. Humanities Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamed S, Duhamel JR, Bremmer F, Graf W (2002) Visual receptive field modulation in the lateral intraparietal area during attentive fixation and free gaze. Cereb Cortex 12(3):234–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe M, Ballard D (2005) Eye movements in natural behavior. Trends Cogn Sci 9(4):188–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayhoe MM, Shrivastava A, Mruczek R, Pelz JB (2003) Visual memory and motor planning in a natural task. J Vision 3(1):49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He PY, Kowler E (1991) Saccadic localization of eccentric forms. J Opt Soc Am A 8(2):440–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Helsen WF, Elliott D, Starkes JL, Ricker KL (2000) Coupling of eye, finger, elbow, and shoulder movements during manual aiming. J Mot Behav 32(3):241–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson J (2003) Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends Cogn Sci 7(11):498–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1988) The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell G, McCourt ME (2000) Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks. Neuropsychologia 38(1):93–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson RS, Westling G, Backstrom A, Flanagan JR (2001) Eye-hand coordination in object manipulation. J Neurosci 21(17):6917–6932

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Just MA, Carpenter PA (1976) Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cogn Psychol 8:441–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinholdermann U, Brenner E, Franz VH, Smeets JB (2007) Grasping trapezoidal objects. Exp Brain Res 180(3):415–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kowler E, Blaser E (1995) The accuracy and precision of saccades to small and large targets. Vision Res 35(12):1741–1754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Land M, Hayhoe M (2001) In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? Vision Res 41(25–26):3559–3565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Land M, Mennie N, Rusted J (1999) The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception 28(11):1311–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman SJ, Wing AM (2003) Perceptual judgement, grasp point selection and object symmetry. Exp Brain Res 152(2):156–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marotta JJ, McKeeff TJ, Behrmann M (2003) Hemispatial neglect: its effects on visual perception and visually guided grasping. Neuropsychologia 41(9):1262–1271

    Google Scholar 

  • McCourt ME, Garlinghouse M (2000) Stimulus modulation of pseudoneglect: influence of line geometry. Neuropsychologia 38(4):520–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCourt ME, Mark VW, Radonovich KJ, Willison SK, Freeman P (1997) The effects of gender, menstrual phase and practice on the perceived location of the midsagittal plane. Neuropsychologia 35(7):17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • McCourt ME, Freeman P, Tahmahkera-Stevens C, Chaussee M (2001) The influence of unimanual response on pseudoneglect magnitude. Brain Cogn 45(1):52–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGowan JW, Kowler E, Sharma A, Chubb C (1998) Saccadic localization of random dot targets. Vision Res 38(6):895–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melcher D, Kowler E (1999) Shapes, surfaces and saccades. Vision Res 39(17):2929–2946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (2006) The visual brain in action, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9(1):97–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Otto-de Haart EG, Carey DP, Milne AB (1999) More thoughts on perceiving and grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion. Neuropsychologia 37(13):1437–1444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salvucci DD, Goldberg JH (2000) Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: Proceedings of the eye tracking research and applications symposium. ACM Press, New York, pp 71–78

  • Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C (1996) Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 381(6582):520–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24:830–846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker M, Ellis R (2001) The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Vis Cogn 8:769–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Donkelaar P, Siu KC, Walterschied J (2004) Saccadic output is influenced by limb kinetics during eye-hand coordination. J Mot Behav 36(3):245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn H, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJ (2007) Grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion: the contributions of vision for perception in action. Neuropsychologia 45(8):1939–1947

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn H, van der Kamp J, de Wit M, Savelsbergh GJ (2009) Another look at the Nuller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception. Neuropsychologia 47(3):804–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Orden KF, Limbert W, Makeig S, Jung TP (2001) Eye activity correlates of workload during a visuospatial memory task. Hum Factors 1:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath D, Kowler E (2003) Localization of shapes: eye movements and perception compared. Vision Res 43(15):1637–1653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath D, Kowler E (2004) Saccadic localization in the presence of cues to three-dimensional shape. J Vision 4(6):445–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishwanath D, Kowler E, Feldman J (2000) Saccadic localization of occluded targets. Vision Res 40(20):2797–2811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werth R, Poppel E (1998) Compression and lateral shift of mental coordinate systems in a line bisection task. Neuropsychologia 8(26):741–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarbus AL (1967) Eye movements and vision. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to J.J.M. and a studentship from the Manitoba Health Research Council (MHRC) to L.D.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Perception and Action Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

    Loni Desanghere & J. J. Marotta

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, P404 Duff Roblin Bldg., 190 Dysart Road, Winnipeg, MB, R3T-2N2, Canada

    Loni Desanghere

Authors
  1. Loni Desanghere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. J. Marotta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Marotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Desanghere, L., Marotta, J.J. “Graspability” of objects affects gaze patterns during perception and action tasks. Exp Brain Res 212, 177–187 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2716-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2716-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation