Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare force accuracy, force variability and muscle activity during constant isometric contractions at different force levels with and without visual feedback and at different feedback gains. In experiment 1, subjects were instructed to accurately match the target force at 2, 15, 30, 50, and 70% of their maximal isometric force with abduction of the index finger and maintain their force even in the absence of visual feedback. Each trial lasted 22 s and visual feedback was removed from 8–12 to 16–20 s. Each subject performed 6 trials at each target force, half with visual gain of 51.2 pixels/N and the rest with a visual gain of 12.8 pixels/N. Force error was calculated as the root mean square error of the force trace from the target line. Force variability was quantified as the standard deviation and coefficient of variation (CVF) of the force trace. The EMG activity of the agonist (first dorsal interosseus; FDI) was measured with bipolar surface electrodes placed distal to the innervation zone. Independent of visual gain and force level, subjects exhibited lower force error with the visual feedback condition (2.53 ± 2.95 vs. 2.71 ± 2.97 N; P < 0.01); whereas, force variability was lower when visual feedback was removed (CVF: 4.06 ± 3.11 vs. 4.47 ± 3.14, P < 0.01). The EMG activity of the FDI muscle was higher during the visual feedback condition and this difference increased especially at higher force levels (70%: 370 ± 149 vs. 350 ± 143 μV, P < 0.01). Experiment 2 examined whether the findings of experiment 1 were driven by the higher force levels and proximity in the gain of visual feedback. Subjects performed constant isometric contractions with the abduction of the index finger at an absolute force of 2 N, with two distinct feedback gains of 15 and 3,000 pixels/N. In agreement with the findings of experiment 1, subjects exhibited lower force error in the presence of visual feedback especially when the feedback gain was high (0.057 ± 0.03 vs. 0.095 ± 0.05 N). However, force variability was not affected by the vastly distinct feedback gains at this force, which supported and extended the findings from experiment 1. Our findings demonstrate that although removal of visual feedback amplifies force error, it can reduce force variability during constant isometric contractions due to an altered activation of the primary agonist muscle most likely at moderate force levels in young adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baweja HS, Patel BK, Martinkewiz JD, Smith MA, Srinivasan D, Christou EA (2008) Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions. Society for Neuroscience, Washington DC

  • Brown P (2000) Cortical drives to human muscle: the Piper and related rhythms. Prog Neurobiol 60:97–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton LG (1992) Visual processing time and the control of movement. In: Proteau L, Elliott D (eds) Vision and motor control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chao EYS, An KN, Cooney WP, Linschied RL (1989) Biomechanics of the hand. A basic research study. World Scientific Publishing, Teaneack, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou EA (2005) Visual feedback attenuates force fluctuations induced by a stressor. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:2126–2133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christou EA, Tracy BL (2005) Aging and motor output variability. In: Davids K, Bennett S, Newell K (eds) Movement system variability. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, pp 199–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou EA, Grossman M, Carlton LG (2002) Modeling variability of force during isometric contractions of the quadriceps femoris. J Mot Behav 34:67–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christou EA, Jakobi JM, Critchlow A, Fleshner M, Enoka RM (2004) The 1- to 2-Hz oscillations in muscle force are exacerbated by stress, especially in older adults. J Appl Physiol 97:225–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ER, Goodeve PJ (1983) Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts’ Law. Q J Exp Psychol A 35:251–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca CJ, Erim Z (1994) Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force. Trends Neurosci 17:299–305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D, Helsen WF, Chua R (2001) A century later: Woodworth’s (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. Psychol Bull 127:342–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Enoka RM, Christou EA, Hunter SK, Kornatz KW, Semmler JG, Taylor AM, Tracy BL (2003) Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falcke M (2003) Buffers and oscillations in intracellular Ca2+ dynamics. Biophys J 84:28–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farina D, Merletti R, Enoka RM (2004) The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 96:1486–1495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulks E, Baweja HS, Patel BK, Martinkewiz JD, Srinivasan D, Christou EA (2008) Breathing amplitude influences force variability but not muscle activity during constant isometric contractions. Society for Neuroscience, Washington DC

  • Homma T, Sakai T (1991) Ramification pattern of intermetacarpal branches of the deep branch (ramus profundus) of the ulnar nerve in the human hand. Acta Anat (Basel) 141:139–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SL, Brown AJ, Newell KM (2008) Compensatory properties of visual information in the control of isometric force. Percept Psychophys 70:306–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter SK, Critchlow A, Shin IS, Enoka RM (2004) Fatigability of the elbow flexor muscles for a sustained submaximal contraction is similar in men and women matched for strength. J Appl Physiol 96:195–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter SK, Taijin T, Patel B, Rodriguez TM, Christou EA (2007) Heart rate contributes to the low-frequency oscillations in force. Society for Neuroscience, San Diego

  • Lee KM, Keller EL (2008) Neural activity in the frontal eye fields modulated by the number of alternatives in target choice. J Neurosci 28:2242–2251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Yasuda N (2007) Forced ventilation increases variability of isometric finger forces. Neurosci Lett 412:243–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZM, Pfaeffle HJ, Sotereanos DG, Goitz RJ, Woo SL (2003) Multi-directional strength and force envelope of the index finger. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18:908–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miall RC, Weir DJ, Stein JF (1993) Intermittency in human manual tracking tasks. J Mot Behav 25:53–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz CT, Barry BK, Pascoe MA, Enoka RM (2005) Discharge rate variability influences the variation in force fluctuations across the working range of a hand muscle. J Neurophysiol 93:2449–2459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prodoehl J, Yu H, Wasson P, Corcos DM, Vaillancourt DE (2008) Effects of visual and auditory feedback on sensorimotor circuits in the Basal Ganglia. J Neurophysiol 99:3042–3051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slifkin AB, Vaillancourt DE, Newell KM (2000) Intermittency in the control of continuous force production. J Neurophysiol 84:1708–1718

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM (2005) Intermittent visual information and the multiple time scales of visual motor control of continuous isometric force production. Percept Psychophys 67:335–344

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM (2006a) Aging, visual intermittency, and variability in isometric force output. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 61:P117–P124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Newell KM (2006b) Information processing limitations with aging in the visual scaling of isometric force. Exp Brain Res 170:423–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnoff JJ, Valantine AD, Newell KM (2006) Independence between the amount and structure of variability at low force levels. Neurosci Lett 392:165–169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AM, Christou EA, Enoka RM (2003) Multiple features of motor-unit activity influence force fluctuations during isometric contractions. J Neurophysiol 90:1350–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy BL (2007a) Force control is impaired in the ankle plantarflexors of elderly adults. Eur J Appl Physiol 101:629–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy BL (2007b) Visuomotor contribution to force variability in the plantarflexor and dorsiflexor muscles. Hum Mov Sci 26:796–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy BL, Dinenno DV, Jorgensen B, Welsh SJ (2007) Aging, visuomotor correction, and force fluctuations in large muscles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:469–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner DL (2002) Expiratory resistive loaded breathing in humans increases fluctuations of force production in submaximal isometric quadriceps contractions. Neurosci Lett 328:13–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Russell DM (2002) Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production. Exp Brain Res 145:275–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Slifkin AB, Newell KM (2001a) Intermittency in the visual control of force in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 138:118–127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Slifkin AB, Newell KM (2001b) Visual control of isometric force in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 39:1410–1418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Larsson L, Newell KM (2003) Effects of aging on force variability, single motor unit discharge patterns, and the structure of 10, 20, and 40 Hz EMG activity. Neurobiol Aging 24:25–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaillancourt DE, Mayka MA, Thulborn KR, Corcos DM (2004) Subthalamic nucleus and internal globus pallidus scale with the rate of change of force production in humans. Neuroimage 23:175–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh SJ, Dinenno DV, Tracy BL (2007) Variability of quadriceps femoris motor neuron discharge and muscle force in human aging. Exp Brain Res 179:219–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the help of Meredith Smith for data collection and the help of Ankit Agrawal and Deepan Srinivasan for computer programming. Supported by R01 AG031769 to EA Christou.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-4243, USA

    Harsimran S. Baweja, Bhavini K. Patel, Julie D. Martinkewiz, Julie Vu & Evangelos A. Christou

Authors
  1. Harsimran S. Baweja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bhavini K. Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julie D. Martinkewiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julie Vu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Evangelos A. Christou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos A. Christou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baweja, H.S., Patel, B.K., Martinkewiz, J.D. et al. Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions. Exp Brain Res 197, 35–47 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1883-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1883-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation