Abstract
A major function of the otolith organ is to detect linear acceleration generated by two different head conditions, dynamic linear translation and static tilt relative to gravity. To investigate these sensory functions of the otolith organ, we analyzed vertical eye position in response to steady-state sinusoidal fore–aft translation over a range of frequencies (0.5–4 Hz) and amplitudes (0.10–0.33 g) in three monkeys. Vertical vestibuloocular reflexes elicited by linear acceleration (LVORs) during sinusoidal fore–aft translation were divided into translational LVOR component and tilt LVOR component taking vertical gaze-dependent properties into account. Based on geometrical considerations, the translational LVOR component, but not the tilt LVOR component, depended on vertical gaze eccentricity. To quantify these two components, we used a V-shaped function model, plotting vertical eye sensitivities (deg/cm) against vertical gaze eccentricities (deg). The slope (deg/cm per degree) and intercept (sensitivity at zero gaze eccentricity) of this function approximately reflected the translational and tilt LVOR components, respectively. Our data show that the tilt LVOR component is independent of the reciprocal of the fixation distance (MA), whereas the translational LVOR component is almost linearly related to MA. The gain of the tilt LVOR component, characterized by low-pass dynamics, was greatest (0.36) at 0.5 Hz. Visual information clearly reduced the gain of the tilt LVOR component, by approximately 50%. There was no difference between the effects of large-field and small-spot stimuli. These findings demonstrate that steady-state sinusoidal fore–aft translation at lower frequencies stimulates the otolith organs and produces a pseudo-pitch tilt in cooperation with the gravito-inertial force and as a result elicits an ocular response equivalent to the tilt LVOR.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelaki DE (1998) Three-dimensional organization of otolith–ocular reflexes in rhesus monkeys. III. Response to translation. J Neurophysiol 80:680–695
Angelaki DE, Hess BJ (1994) Inertial representation of angular motion in the vestibular system of rhesus monkeys. I. Vestibuloocular reflex. J Neurophysiol 71:1222–1249
Angelaki DE, McHenry MQ, Hess BJ (2000) Primate translational vestibuloocular reflex. I. High-frequency dynamics and three-dimensional properties during lateral motion. J Neurophysiol 83:1637–1647
Baloh RW, Honrubia V (1990) The central vestibular system. In: Baloh RW, Honrubia V (eds) Clinical Neurophysiology of the vestibular system, F.A. Davis, Philadelphia, pp 44–87
Baarsma EA, Collewijn H (1975) Eye movements due to linear accelerations in the rabbit. J Physiol 245:227–247
Bush G.A, Miles FA (1996) Short-latency compensatory eye movements associated with a brief period of free fall. Exp Brain Res 108:337–340
Collewijn H, Van Der Steen J, Ferman L, Jansen TC (1985) Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recording. Exp Brain Res 59:185–196
Fernandez C, Goldberg JM (1976) Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. J Neurophysiol 39:970–984
Fuchs AF, Robinson DA (1966) A method for measuring horizontal and vertical eye movement chronically in the monkey. J Appl Physiol 21:1068–1070
Goltz HC, Wada Y, Paige G.D (2000) Human linear vestibulo-ocular reflex during naso-occipital motion. Neurosci Abstr 26:1713
Groen E, Bos JE, de Graaf B (1999) Contribution of the otoliths to the human torsional vestibulo-ocular reflex. J Vestib Res 9:27–36
Hays AV, Richmond BJ, Optican LM (1982) A UNIX-based multiple process system for real-time data acquisition and control. WESCON Conf Proc 2/1:1–10
Hess BJM, Angelaki DE (1999) Oculomotor control of primary position discriminates between translation and tilt. J Neurophysiol 81:394–398
Judge SJ, Richmond BJ, Chu FC (1980) Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: an improved method. Vision Res 20:535–538
Kingma H, Stegeman P, Vogels R (1997) Ocular torsion induced by static and dynamic visual stimulation and static whole body roll. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 254(Suppl 1):61–63
Kodaka Y, Wada Y, Kawano K (2003) Vergence responses to forward motion in monkeys. Visual modulation at ultra-short latencies. Exp Brain Res 148:541–544
Lisberger SG (1994) Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. III. Computational and behavioral analysis of the sites of learning. J Neurophysiol 72:974–998
MacDougall HG, Curthoys IS, Betts GA, Burgess AM, Halmagyi GM (1999) Human ocular counterrolling during roll-tilt and centrifugation. Ann NY Acad Sci 871:173–180
Markham CH, Diamond SG (2002–2003) Ocular counterrolling in response to static and dynamic tilting: implications for human otolith function. Vestib Res 12:127–134
McHenry MQ, Angelaki DE (2000) Primate translational vestibuloocular reflexes. II. Version and vergence responses to fore–aft motion. J Neurophysiol 83:1648–1661
Merfeld DM, Zupan LH (2002) Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. III. Modeling tilt and translation responses. J Neurophysiol 87:819–833
Merfeld DM, Park S, Gianna-Poulin C, Black FO, Wood S (2005) Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during translation and tilt. J Neurophysiol 94:186–198
Paige GD (1989) The influence of target distance on eye movement responses during vertical linear motion. Exp Brain Res 77:585–593
Paige GD, Tomko DL (1991a) Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. I. Basic characteristics. J Neurophysiol 65:1170–1182
Paige GD, Tomko DL (1991b) Eye movement responses to linear head motion in the squirrel monkey. II. Visual-vestibular interaction and kinetic conditions. J Neurophysiol 65:1183–1196
Ramat S, Zee DS (2003) Ocular motor responses to abrupt interaural head translation in normal humans. J Neurophysiol 90:887–902
Sanderson J (2002) Aviation physiology. In: Private pilot manual, Jeppesen Sanderson Inc., Denver, p 11
Seidman SH, Telford L, Paige GD (1995) Vertical, horizontal, and torsional eye movement responses to head roll in the squirrel monkey. Exp Brain Res 104:218–226
Seidman SH, Telford L, Paige GD (1998) Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration. Exp Brain Res 119:307–314
Shitara A, Yagi T (2000) Three-dimensional analysis of eye movements induced by roll and pitch tilt. Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 103:748–753
Telford L, Seidman SH, Paige GD (1997) Dynamics of squirrel monkey linear vestibuloocular reflex and interactions with fixation distance. J Neurophysiol 78:1775–1790
Wada Y, Goltz HC, Seidman SH, Paige GD (1998) Human vestibulo-ocular reflex during low frequency translation. Soc Neurosci Abstr 24:416
Wada Y, Kodaka Y, Kawano K (2007) Vertical ocular responses to constant linear acceleration generated by fore–aft head translation in monkeys. Neurosci Res 57:240–247
Zhou W, Tang BF, Newland SD, King WM (2006) Responses of monkey vestibular-only neurons to translation and angular rotation. J Neurophysiol 96:2915–2930
Acknowledgments
We thank K. Miura for helpful discussion relevant to the model. This research was supported by “Ground-based Research Announcement for Space Utilization” promoted by the Japan Space Forum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wada, Y., Kodaka, Y. & Kawano, K. Vertical eye position responses to steady-state sinusoidal fore–aft head translation in monkeys. Exp Brain Res 185, 75–86 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1137-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1137-3