Abstract
Humans use the same representations to code self-produced and observed actions. Neurophysiological evidence for this view comes from the discovery of the so-called mirror neurons in premotor cortex of the macaque monkey. These neurons respond when the monkey performs a particular action but also when it observes the same behavior in another individual. In humans, such direct links between perception and action seem to mediate action priming, where a response is facilitated when a similar action is observed. An issue that has not been fully resolved concerns the role of selective attention in these processes. Action priming appears to be an automatic process in the sense that the observed action can be irrelevant to the observer’s task and nevertheless prime similar responses. However, it is not known whether attention has to be oriented to the action for these processes to be engaged. It is demonstrated here that spatial attention indeed has to be oriented to the action related body site for action priming to take place. Furthermore, if attention is oriented to the appropriate body site, there need be no visual cues to action for action priming to emerge.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Please note that our paradigm does not allow us to differentiate between facilitation and interference accounts of the effect. The reason is that the ‘head’ condition is not an appropriate baseline condition. In the ‘limb’ condition, the colored targets could appear on either the feet or on the hands of the actor. In the ‘head’ condition, however, the colored targets always appeared on the actor’s head. Thus, for any given trial, the probability for a target to appear on the head is 50%, whereas it is 25% for either of the limbs (feet or hand). This should speed up detection times of the targets in the ‘head’ condition. face, which might have speeded up detection times of the colored targets.
References
Arbib MA (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behav Brain Sci 28(2):105–124
Bach P, Tipper SP (2006) Implicit action encoding influences personal-trait judgments. Cognition (in press)
Barsalou, LW, Niedenthal PM, Barbey A, Ruppert J (2003) Social embodiment. In: Ross B (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation, vol 43. Academic, San Diego, pp 43–92
Bernieri FJ (1988) Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher–student interactions. J Nonverbal Behav 12:120–138
Brass M, Bekkering H, Wohlschläger A, Prinz W (2000) Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: comparing symbolic, spatial and imitative cues. Brain Cogn 44:124–143
Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund H-J (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13:400–404
Carr L, Iacoboni M, Dubeau M-C, Mazziotta JC, Lenzi GL (2003) Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for action representation to limbic areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:5497–5502
Chaminade T, Meltzoff AN, Decety J (2005) An fMRI study of imitation: action representation and body schema. Neuropsychologia 45:115–127
Chartrand TL, Bargh JA (1999) The chameleon effect: the perception-behaviour link and social interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 76:893–891
Dapretto M, Davies MS, Pfeifer JH, Scott AA, Sigman M, Bookheimer SY, Iacoboni M (2006) Understanding emotions in others: mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders. Nat Neurosci 9:28–30
Dimberg U (1982) Facial reactions to facial expressions. Psychophysiology 19(6):643–647
DiPellegrino G, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (1992) Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp Brain Res 91:176–189
Downing PE, Jiang Y, Shuman M, Kanwisher N (2001) A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293:2470–2473
Elsner B, Aschersleben G (2003) Do I get what you get? Learning about effects of self-performed and observed actions in infants. Conscious Cogn 12(4):732–751
Fadiga L, Craighero L, Olivier E (2005) Human motor cortex excitability during the perception of others’ action. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15(2):213–218
Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119:593–609
Goldenberg G (1995) Imitating gestures and manipulating a mannikin—the representation of the human body in ideomotor apraxia. Neuropsychologia 33:63–72
Goldenberg G (1996) Defective imitation of gestures in patients with damage in the left or right hemisphere. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 61:176–180
Grèzes J, Armony L, Rowe J, Passingham RE (2003) Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 18:928–937
Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC). A framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–878
Iacoboni M, Woods RP, Brass M, Bekkering H, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G, (1999) Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286:2526–2568
Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J (2006) Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. NeuroImage 31:429–439
Kilner JM, Paulignan Y, Blakemore SJ (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Curr Biol 13:522–525
Koski L, Wohlschläger A, Bekkering H, Woods RP, Dubeau M-C, Mazziotta JC, Iacoboni M (2002) Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. Cereb Cortex 12:847–55
Leslie KR, Johnson-Frey SH, Grafton ST (2004) Functional imaging of face and hand imitation: towards a motor theory of empathy. NeuroImage 21:601–607
Maeda F, Mazziotta J. Iacoboni M (2002) Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of the human mirror neuron system. In: International Congress Series (1232). Recent Adv human brain mapping, pp 889–894
Meltzoff AN, Moore MK (1997) Explaining facial imitation. A theoretical model. Early Dev Parenting 6:179–192
Oztop E, Arbib MA (2002) Schema design and implementation of the grasp-related mirror neuron system. Biol Cybern 87:116–140
Peelen M, Downing P (2005) Is the extrastriate body area involved in motor actions. Nat Neurosci 8(2):125
Posner MI, Cohen Y (1984) Components of visual orienting. In: Bouma H, Bouwhuis DG (eds) Attention and performance X, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 531–556
Preston SD, de Waal FBM (2002) Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases. Behav Brain Sci 25:1–72
Prinz W (1990) A common-coding approach to perception and action. In: Neumann O, Prinz W (eds) Relationships between perception and action: current approaches. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 167–201
Reed CL, Farah MJ (1995) The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:334–343
Rizzolatti G, Arbib MA (1998) Language within our grasp. Trends Neurosci 21(5):188–194
Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Stumpf L, Prinz W (2005) Far from action blind: representation of others’ actions in individuals with autism. Cogn Neuropsychol 22(3–4):433–454
Stürmer B, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2000) Correspondence effects with manual gestures and postures: a study of imitation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26(6):1746–1759
Théoret H, Halligan E, Kobayashi M, Fregni F, Tager-Flusberg H, Pascual-Leone A (2005) Impaired motor facilitation during action observation in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Curr Biol 15(3):84–85
Thomas R, Press C, Haggard P (2006) Shared representations in body perception. Acta Psychologica 121:317–330
Tipper SP, Lloyd D, Shorland B, Dancer C, Howard LA, McGlone F (1998) Vision influences tactile perception without proprioceptive orienting. NeuroReport 9:1741–1744
Tipper SP, Phillips N, Dancer C, Lloyd D, Howard LA, McGlone F (2001) Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be directly viewed. Exp Brain Res 139:160–167
Tucker M, Ellis R (1998) On the relations between seen objects and the components of potential actions. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 24:830–846
Urgesi C, Berlucchi G, Aglioti SM (2004) Magnetic Stimulation of Extrastriate Body Area Impairs Visual Processing of Non-facial Body Parts. Curr Biol 14:2130–2134
Van Baaren RB, Holland RW, Kawakami K, van Knippenberg A (2004) Mimicry and prosocial behavior. Psychol Sci 15:71–74
Vaughan KB, Lanzetta JT (1980) Vicarious instigation and conditioning of facial, expressive and autonomic responses to a model’s expressive displays of pain. J Pers Soc Psychol 38:909–923
Williams JHG, Whiten A, Suddendorf T, Perrett DJ (2001) Imitation, mirror neurons and autism. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25:287–295
Wilson M (2001) Perceiving imitatable stimuli: consequences of isomorphism between input and output. Psychol Bull 127:543–553
Wilson M, Knoblich G (2005) The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychol Bull 131:460–473
Wohlschläger A, Bekkering H (2002) Is human imitation based on a mirror-neuron system? Some behavioural evidence. Exp Brain Res 143(3):335–341
Acknowledgments
The work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Progamme grant awarded to SPT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bach, P., Peatfield, N.A. & Tipper, S.P. Focusing on body sites: the role of spatial attention in action perception. Exp Brain Res 178, 509–517 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0756-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0756-4