Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy and underlying mechanisms of shifting movements in cellists

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accuracy of shifting movements between two notes was examined in nine cellists (intermediate-professional skill levels). Three pairs of notes separated by different distances were tested under the same movement rate. Finger position on the string was measured by a circuit. Angular velocities of the left upper arm and forearm were measured by two angular velocity sensors; thus elbow angular velocity during shifts was estimated. Results showed that with increased elbow velocity and shifting distance endpoint variability stayed constant. The force of gravity assisted elbow extension during shifts toward higher pitched notes compared to flexion towards lower pitched notes, but faster movement velocity did not result in increased landing variability. Performance for note E on the A string was found to be less variable than other notes, suggesting that physical cue from the cello body geometry was used as a landmark for finger position. Cutaneous feedback from the thumb when hitting the body–neck junction enabled faster elbow extension velocity compared to shifts towards other notes. Cellists who showed higher performance accuracy also showed higher perceptual ability and performance proficiency. These results suggest that long-term over-training of fast and accurate movements enables musicians to maintain accuracy and variability across different movement distances and velocities. Higher perceptual ability and performance proficiency are correlated with increased accuracy but not lower variability, indicating although perceptual ability and performance proficiency are important for pitch accuracy, movement variability is still constrained by the capacity of the motor system, which is highly fine-tuned and different than non-musicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Fookson O, Poizner H (1999) Pointing in 3D space to remembered targets. II. Effects of movement speed toward kinesthetically defined targets. Exp Brain Res 125(2):200–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams JA (1971) A closed-loop theory of motor learning. J Mot Behav 3:111–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collewijn H, Erkelens CJ, Steinman RM (1988) Binocular co-ordination of human vertical saccadic eye movements. J Physiol (Lond) 404:183–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crossman ERFW, Goodeve PJ (1983) Feedback control of hand-movement and Fitts’ law. Q J Exp Psychol 35A:251–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psycol 47:381–391

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Lolley S (2001) The inertial anisotropy of the arm is accurately predicted during movement planning. J Neurosci 21(4):1361–1369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fyk J (1995) Melodic intonation, psychoacoustics, and the violin. Organon, Zielona Gora

    Google Scholar 

  • Imanaka K (1993) Information-processing mediating the location–distance interference in motor short-term memory. Ann Physiol Anthropol 12(5):269–283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kay BA, Turvey MT, Meijer OG (2003) An early oscillator model: studies on the biodynamics of the piano strike (Bernstein & Popova, 1930). Motor Control 7:1–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keele SW (1986) Motor control. In: Kaufman L, Thomas J, Boff K (eds) Handbook of perception and performance. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keele SW, Posner MI (1968) Processing visual feedback in rapid movement. J Exp Psychol 77:155–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS (1977) Motor control mechanisms underlying human movement reproduction. J Exp Psychol 3:529–543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelso JAS, Holt KJ (1980) Exploring a vibratory systems analysis of human movement production. J Neurophysiol 43:1183–1196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus A, Murphy S, McKenna I, Mon-Williams M (2005) Reduced fields of view are neither necessary nor sufficient for distance underestimation but reduce precision and may cause calibration problems. Exp Brain Res 158(3):328–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Marteniuk RG, Mackenzie CL, Jeannerod M (1987) Constraints on human arm movements trajectories. Can J Psychol 41:365–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Messier J, Kalaska JF (1999) Comparison of variability of initial kinematics and endpoints of reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 125(2):139–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JEK (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psychol Rev 95:340–370

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Smith K, Kornblum S, Abrams RA, Wright CE (1990) Speed–accuracy tradeoffs in aimed movements: toward a theory of rapid voluntary action. In: Jeannerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII: motor representation and control. Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp 173–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison S (2000) Effect of Melodic context, tuning behaviors, and experience on the intonation accuracy of wind players. J Res Music Educ 48:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer C, Meyer R (2000) Conceptual and motor learning in music performance. Psychol Sci 11:63–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Stapley P (1998) Effects of movement direction upon kinematic characteristics of vertical arm pointing movements in man. Neurosci Lett 253:103–106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper RL, Herman LM (1970) Decay and interference effects in the short-term retention of a discrete motor act. J Exp Psychol 83(2):1–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plamondon R, Alimi AM (1997) Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements. Behav Brain Sci 20:279–349

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polit A, Bizzi E (1979) Characteristics of motor programs underlying arm movements in monkeys. J Neurophysiol 42:183–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum D (1991) Human motor control. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlykowa L, Hoffmann KP, Bremmer F, Thiele A, Ehrenstein WH (1996) Monkey saccadic latency and pursuit velocity show a preference for upward directions of target motion. NeuroReport 7:409–412

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt RA, Zelaznik HN, Hawkins B, Frank JS, Quinn JT Jr (1979) Motor output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychol Rev 86:415–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach GE et al (1975) Preselection in short-term motor memory. J Exp Psychol 1:745–755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stelmach GE et al (1976) Preselection and response biasing in short-term motor memory. Mem Cogn 4:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyrnis N, Evdokimidis I, Constantinidis TS, Kastrinakis G (2000) Speed–accuracy trade-off in the performance of pointing movements in different directions in two-dimensional space. Exp Brain Res 134:21–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winold H, Thelen E, Feng J (2002) On the rebound. The Strad 514–521

  • Woodworth RS (1899) The accuracy of voluntary movement. Psychol Rev 3(13):1–114

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Dr. Paul van Donkelaar for his comments on the earlier version of this manuscript. This study was funded by a grant from the National Academy of Recoding Arts and Sciences to M. Woollacott, PI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessie Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, J., Woollacott, M. & Pologe, S. Accuracy and underlying mechanisms of shifting movements in cellists. Exp Brain Res 174, 467–476 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0483-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0483-x

Keywords

Navigation