Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human motor behavior is remarkably accurate, even though many everyday skills require flexible adjustments between motor activity and its consequences in extracorporeal space. The present study addressed two questions: first, how do people compensate for unpredictable changes in the environment, and second, how do they adapt to such changes? In Experiment 1, participants repeatedly and continuously drew up and down strokes on a writing pad. After drawing under a base mapping, either (a) a change of target position, or (b) a change of gain, or (c) both occurred. Compensation for gain changes occurred later than compensation for changes in target position. In addition, there were aftereffects of the previous movement in accuracy and movement time. Adaptation to changes occurred in reference to extracorporeal space, with motor constraints as a limiting factor. In Experiment 2 we obtained similar effects when participants had more time to adapt. The view that movements are planned in reference to their goals in extracorporeal space is supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A–C
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3A–F
Fig. 4A–D

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abend W, Bizzi E, Morasso P (1982) Human arm trajectory formation. Brain 105:331–348

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atkeson CG, Hollerbach JM (1985) Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. J Neurosci 5:2318–2330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford FL (1994) Of computer mice and men. Cahiers Psychol Cognit 13:405–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner E, Smeets JBJ (1997) Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position. J Mot Behav 29:297–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancause N, Ptito A, Levin MF (2002) Error correction strategies for motor behavior after unilateral brain damage: short term motor learning processes. Neuropsychologia 40:1313–1323

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmurget M, Jordan M, Prablanc C, Jeannerod M (1997) Constrained and unconstrained movements involve different control strategies. J Neurophysiol 77:1644–1650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitts PM, Peterson JR (1964) Information capacity of discrete motor responses. J Exp Psychol 67:103–112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Rao AK (1995) Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol 74:2174–2178

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Henis E (1991) Arm trajectory modifications during reaching towards visual targets. J Cogn Neurosci 3:220–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Flash T, Hogan N (1985) The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. J Neurosci 5:1688–1703

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T, Ashe J (2003) Adaptation of arm trajectory during continuous drawings movements in different dynamic environments. Exp Brain Res 148:95–104 (DOI 10.1007/s00221-002-1260-0)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghahramani Z, Wolpert DM, Jordan MI, Jordon MI (1996) Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation. J Neurosci 16:7085–7096

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghilardi MF, Gordon J, Ghez C (1995) Learning a visuomotor transformation in a local area of work space produces directional biases in other areas. J Neurophysiol 73:2535–2539

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM (1998) Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J Neurophysiol 79:1825–1838

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM (1999) The effect of visuomotor displacements on arm movement paths. Exp Brain Res 127:213–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald AG (1970) Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: with special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychol Rev 77:73–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan N, Flash T (1987) Moving gracefully: quantitative theories of motor coordination. Trends Neurosci 10:170–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel B, Müsseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action. Behav Brain Sci 24:869–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Imamizu H, Uno Y, Kawato M (1995) Internal representations of the motor apparatus: Implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 21:1174–1198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imamizu H, Miyauchi S, Tamada T, Sasaki Y, Takino R, Putz B, Yoshioka T, Kawato M (2000) Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool. Nature 403:192–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890) The principles of psychology. Holt, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones KE, Wessberg J, Valbo A (2001) Proprioceptive feedback is reduced during adaptation to a visuomotor transformation: preliminary findings. Neuroreport 12:4029–4033

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagerer FA, Contreras-Vidal JL, Stelmach GE (1997) Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Exp Brain Res 115:557–561

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kantowitz BH, Elvers GC (1988) Fitts’ law with an isometric controller: effects of order of control and control-display gain. J Mot Behav 20:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblich G, Kircher TTJ (2004) Deceiving oneself about being in control: conscious detection of changes in visuo-motor coupling. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:657–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechsner F, Kerzel D, Knoblich G, Prinz W (2001) Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination. Nature 414:69–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer DE, Abrams RA, Kornblum S, Wright CE, Smith JEK (1988) Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements. Psych Rev 95:340–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mottet D, Bardy BG, Athenes S (1994) A note on data smoothing for movement analysis: the relevance of a nonlinear method. J Mot Behav 26:51–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellizzer G, Richter H, Georgopoulos AP (1999) Drawing under visuomotor incongruence. Exp Brain Res 125:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Prablanc C, Tzavaras A, Jeannerod M (1975) Adaptation of hand tracking to rotated visual coordinates. Percept Psychophys 17:325–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1992) Why don’t we perceive our brain states? Eur J Cogn Psychol 4:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz W (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9:129–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogosky BJ, Rosenbaum DA (2000) Frames of reference for human perceptual-motor coordination: space-based versus joint-based adaptation. J Mot Behav 32:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum DA, Gregory RW (2002) Development of a method for measuring movement-related effort: biomechanical considerations and implications for Fitts’ law. Exp Brain Res 142:365–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman E (1979) Levels of sensorimotor representation. J Math Psychol 20:91–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidt RA, Dingwell JB, Mussa-Ivaldi FA (2001) Learning to move amid uncertainty. J Neurophysiol 86:971–985

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi F (1994) Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci 14:3208–3224

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Flanders M (1989) Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. J Neurophysiol 62:595–608

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soechting JF, Lacquaniti F (1983) Modification of trajectory of a pointing movement in response to a change in target location. J Neurophysiol 49:548–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoroughman KA, Shadmehr R (2000) Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407:742–747

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tong C, Flanagan JR (2003) Task-specific internal models for kinematic transformations. J Neurophysiol 90:578–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter P, Wolpert DM (2000) Context estimation for sensorimotor control. J Neurophysiol 84:1026–1034

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch R (1986) Adaptation of space perception. In: Boff R, Kaufmann L, Thomas J (eds) Handbook of perception and human performance, vol.1. Wiley, New York, pp 24/1–24/45

  • Welford AT (1968). Fundamentals of skill. Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2001) Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11:R729–R732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1994) Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements. Exp Brain Res 98:153–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res 103:460–470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dirk Kerzel and Lothar Knuf for providing helpful computer routines and Mark Grosjean for his help in the use of MATLAB. Further thanks go to Christian Ginglseder, Ursula Weber and Milena Yosifova for their help with collecting and preparing the data. We also thank Fiorello Banci for building the cover for the writing pad. In addition, we thank two anonymous reviewers for constructive comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Amalienstrasse 33, 80799, Munich, Germany

    Martina Rieger, Günther Knoblich & Wolfgang Prinz

Authors
  1. Martina Rieger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Günther Knoblich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfgang Prinz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Rieger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rieger, M., Knoblich, G. & Prinz, W. Compensation for and adaptation to changes in the environment. Exp Brain Res 163, 487–502 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2203-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-004-2203-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation