Skip to main content
Log in

Tactile stimulus predictability modulates activity in a tactile-motor cortical network

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manipulating objects in the hand requires the continuous transformation of sensory input into appropriate motor behaviour. Using a novel vibrotactile device combined with fMRI, the cortical network associated with tactile sensorimotor transformations was investigated. Continuous tactile stimuli were delivered in a random or predictable pattern to the second digit on the right hand of all subjects. To better distinguish sensory and motor processes, subjects were instructed to make proportionate motor gripping responses with their left hand. A consistent cortical network of activation was revealed that included the supplementary motor, dorsal and ventral premotor, posterior parietal, primary and secondary somatosensory and primary motor cortex. Tracking the unpredictable versus predictable tactile stimulus led to greater delays in motor responses and to increased performance errors. Cortical effects due to stimulus predictability were observed in several components of the network, though it was most evident as increased cortical activation in frontal motor regions during tracking of unpredictable tactile stimuli. In contrast to the proposed hypotheses, primary and secondary somatosensory cortices contralateral to tactile input did not reveal enhanced responses during unpredictable tracking. Facilitation during unpredictable tracking was also observed in primary somatosensory cortex contralateral to motor responses, the receptive site for movement-related afference. The present study provides a novel and controlled approach to investigate the loci associated with tactile-motor processing and to measure the task-specific effect of stimulus predictability on network components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Wong EC, Hyde JS (1993) Processing strategies for time-course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Mag Res Med 30:161–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burton H (2002) Cerebral cortical regions devoted to the somatosensory system: results from brain imaging studies in humans. In: Nelson RJ (ed) The somatosensory system: deciphering the brain’s own body image. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 27–72

  • Burton H, Sinclair RJ (2000) Attending to and remembering tactile stimuli: a review of brain imaging data and single-neuron responses. J Clin Neurophysiol 17(6):575–591

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burton H, Abend NS, MacLeod AM, Sinclair RJ, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME (1999) Tactile attention tasks enhance activation in somatosensory regions of parietal cortex: a positron emission tomography study. Cereb Cortex 9:662–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen LG, Bandinelli S, Sato S, Kufta C, Hallet M (1991) Attenuation in detection for somatosensory stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81:366–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox RW (1996) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comp Biomed Res 29:162–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cox RW, Jesmanowicz A (1999) Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI. Mag Res Med 42:1014–1018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dassonville P, Lewis SM, Zhu XH, Ugurbil K, Kim SG, Ashe J (1998) Effects of movement predictability on cortical motor activation. Neurosci Res 32(1):65–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deiber MP, Passingham RE, Colebatch JG, Friston KJ, Nixon PD, Frackowiak RS (1991) Cortical areas and the selection of movement: a study with positron emission tomography. Exp Brain Res 84:393–402

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC (1995) Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Mag Res Med 33:636–647

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Francis ST, Kelly EF, Bowtell R Dunseath WJ, Folger SE, McGlone F (2000) FMRI of the responses to vibratory stimulation of digit tips. Neuroimage 11:188–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friston KJ, Buechel C, Fink GR, Morris J, Rolls E, Dolan RJ (1997) Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging. Neuroimage 6:218–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glover GH, Lai S (1998) Self-navigated spiral fMRI: interleaved versus single-shot. Mag Res Med 39:361–368

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton ST, Mazziotta JC, Woods RP, Phelps ME (1992) Human functional anatomy of visually guided finger movements. Brain 115:565–87

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham SJ, Staines WR, Nelson AJ, Plewes DB, McIlroy WE (2001) New devices to deliver somatosensory stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Mag Res Med 46:436–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guillery RW, Feig SL, Lozsadi DA (1998) Paying attention to the thalamic reticular nucleus. Trends Neurosci 21:28–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson T, Brismar T (1999) Tactile stimulation of the hand causes bilateral cortical activation: a functional magnetic resonance study in humans. Neurosci Lett 271:29–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huttunen J, Wikstrom H, Korvenoja A, Seppalainen AM, Aronen H, Ilmoniemi RJ (1996) Significance of the second somatosensory cortex in sensorimotor integration: enhancement of sensory responses during finger movements. Neuroreport 7(5):1009–12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Innocenti GM (1986) General organization of callosal connections in the cerebral cortex. In: Jones EG, Peters A (eds) Cerebral cortex. 5. Sensory-motor areas and aspects of cortical connectivity. Plenum, New York

  • Iwamura Y (2000) Bilateral receptive field neurons and callosal connections in the somatosensory cortex. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 355:267–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2002) Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologica 40:1706–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jancke L, Loose R, Lutz K, Specht K, Shah NJ (2000) Cortical activations during paced finger tapping applying visual and auditory pacing stimuli. Cogn Brain Res 10:51–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen-Berg H, Christensen V, Woolrich M, Matthews P (2000) Attention to touch modulates activity in both primary and secondary somatosensory areas. Neuroreport 11:1237–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karhu J, Tesche CD (1999) Simultaneous early processing of sensory input in human primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices. J Neurophysiol 81(5):2017–25

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz K, Specht K, Shah NJ, Jancke L (2000) Tapping movements according to regular and irregular visual timing signals investigated with fMRI. Neuroreport 11(6):1301–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manzoni T, Conti, F, Fabri M (1986) Callosal projections from area SII to SI in monkeys: anatomical organization and comparison with association projections. J Comp Neurol 252 (2):245–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews PBC (1988) Proprioceptors and their contribution to somatosensory mapping: complex messages require complex processing. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 66:430–438

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer E, Ferguson SS, Zatorre RJ, Alivisatos B, Marrett S, Evans AC, Hakim AM (1991) Attention modulates somatosensory cerebral blood flow response to vibrotactile stimulation as measured by positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 29(4):440–3

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mima T, Nagamine T, Nakamura K, Shibasaki H (1998) Attention modulates both primary and second somatosensory cortical activities in humans: a magnetoencephalographic study. J Neurophysiol 80(4):2215–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RJ (1996) Interactions between motor commands and somatic perception in sensorimotor cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 6:801–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rushworth MF, Nixon PD, Renowden S, Wade DT, Passingham RE (1997) The left parietal cortex and motor attention. Neuropsychologica 35:1261–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rushworth MF, Krams M, Passingham RE (2001) The attentional role of the left parietal cortex: the distinct lateralization and localization of motor attention in the human brain. J Cogn Neurosci 13:698–710

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarter M, Givens B, Bruno JP (2001) The cognitive neuroscience of sustained attention: where top-down meets bottom-up. Brain Res Rev 35:146–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler A, Slamelin R, Salenius S, Jousmaki V, Hari T (1995) Tactile information from the human hand reaches the ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex. Neurosci Let 200:25–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shanks MF, Pearson RCA, Powell TPS (1985) The callosal connections of the primary somatic sensory cortex in the monkey. Brain Res Rev 9:43–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staines WR, Graham S, Black S, McIlroy WE (2002) Task-relevant modulation of primary somatosensory cortex is mediated via prefrontal cortical gating system. Neuroimage 15(1):190–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz PN, Roy A, Fitzgerald PJ, Hsiao SS, Johnson KO, Neibur E (2000) Attention modulates synchronized neuronal firing pattern in primate somatosensory cortex. Nature 404(6774):187–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zangaladze A, Epstein CM, Grafton ST, Sathian K (1999) Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature 401:587–590

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) and the Natural Science and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC). A.J.N. received graduate scholarship support from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. W.R.S. received post-doctoral support from the Neuroscience Canada Foundation and the CIHR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. E. McIlroy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, A.J., Staines, W.R. & McIlroy, W.E. Tactile stimulus predictability modulates activity in a tactile-motor cortical network. Exp Brain Res 154, 22–32 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1627-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1627-x

Keywords

Navigation