Skip to main content
Log in

Rapid ultra-trace analysis of sucralose in multiple-origin aqueous samples by online solid-phase extraction coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Because of its widespread consumption and its persistence during wastewater treatment, the artificial sweetener sucralose has gained considerable interest as a proxy to detect wastewater intrusion into usable water resources. The molecular resilience of this compound dictates that coastal and oceanic waters are the final recipient of this compound with unknown effects on ecosystems. Furthermore, no suitable methodologies have been reported for routine, ultra-trace detection of sucralose in seawater as the sensitivity of traditional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis is limited by a low yield of product ions upon collision-induced dissociation (CID). In this work, we report the development and field test of an alternative analysis tool for sucralose in environmental waters, with enough sensitivity for the proper quantitation and confirmation of this analyte in seawater. The methodology is based on automated online solid-phase extraction (SPE) and high-resolving-power orbitrap MS detection. Operating in full scan (no CID), detection of the unique isotopic pattern (100:96:31 for [M−H], [M−H+2], and [M−H+4], respectively) was used for ultra-trace quantitation and analyte identification. The method offers fast analysis (14 min per run) and low sample consumption (10 mL per sample) with method detection and confirmation limits (MDLs and MCLs) of 1.4 and 5.7 ng/L in seawater, respectively. The methodology involves low operating costs due to virtually no sample preparation steps or consumables. As an application example, samples were collected from 17 oceanic and estuarine sites in Broward County, FL, with varying salinity (6–40 PSU). Samples included the ocean outfall of the Southern Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) that serves Hollywood, FL. Sucralose was detected above MCL in 78 % of the samples at concentrations ranging from 8 to 148 ng/L, with the exception of the WWTP ocean outfall (at pipe end, 28 m below the surface) where the measured concentration was 8418 ± 3813 ng/L. These results demonstrate the applicability of this monitoring tool for the trace-level detection of this wastewater marker in very dilute environmental waters.

Ultra-trace detection of the intact sucralose anion and it isotopic signature in waters using online SPE and orbitrap HRMS

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sharma VK, Oturan M, Kim H (2014) Oxidation of artificial sweetener sucralose by advanced oxidation processes: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 21:8525–8533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tollefsen KE, Nizzetto L, Huggett DB (2012) Presence, fate and effects of the intense sweetener sucralose in the aquatic environment. Sci Total Environ 438:510–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Soh L, Connors KA, Brooks BW, Zimmerman J (2011) Fate of sucralose through environmental and water treatment processes and impact on plant indicator species. Environ Sci Technol 45:1363–1369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Torres CI, Ramakrishna S, Chiu C-A, Nelson KG, Westerhoff P, Krajmalnik-Brown R (2011) Fate of sucralose during wastewater treatment. Environ Eng Sci 28:325–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mawhinney DB, Young RB, Vanderford BJ, Borch T, Snyder SA (2011) Artificial sweetener sucralose in U.S. drinking water systems. Environ Sci Technol 45:8716–8722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kokotou MG, Asimakopoulos AG, Thomaidis NS (2012) Artificial sweeteners as emerging pollutants in the environment: analytical methodologies and environmental impact. Anal Methods 4:3057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Oppenheimer J, Eaton A, Badruzzaman M, Haghani AW, Jacangelo JG (2011) Occurrence and suitability of sucralose as an indicator compound of wastewater loading to surface waters in urbanized regions. Water Res 45:4019–4027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mead RN, Morgan JB, Avery GB, Kieber RJ, Kirk AM, Skrabal SA, Willey JD (2009) Occurrence of the artificial sweetener sucralose in coastal and marine waters of the United States. Mar Chem 116:13–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Loos R, Gawlik BM, Boettcher K, Locoro G, Contini S, Bidoglio G (2009) Sucralose screening in European surface waters using a solid-phase extraction-liquid chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method. J Chromatogr A 1216:1126–1131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrer I, Thurman EM (2010) Analysis of sucralose and other sweeteners in water and beverage samples by liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1217:4127–4134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Minten J, Adolfsson-Erici M (2011) A method for the analysis of sucralose with electrospray LC/MS in recipient waters and in sewage effluent subjected to tertiary treatment technologies. Intern J Environ Anal Chem 91:357–366

  12. Huntscha S, Singer HP, McArdell CS, Frank CE, Hollender J (2012) Multiresidue analysis of 88 polar organic micropollutants in ground, surface and wastewater using online mixed-bed multilayer solid-phase extraction coupled to high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1268:74–83

  13. Pasquini L, Munoz J-F, Rimlinger N, Dauchy X, France X, Pons M-N, Görner T (2013) Assessment of the fate of some household micropollutants in urban wastewater treatment plant. Chem Pap 67:601–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Batchu SR, Quinete N, Panditi VR, Gardinali PR (2013) Online solid phase extraction liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SPE-LC-MS/MS) method for the determination of sucralose in reclaimed and drinking waters and its photo degradation in natural waters from South Florida. Chem Cent J 7:141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Loos R, Carvalho R, António DC, Comero S, Locoro G, Tavazzi S, Paracchini B, Ghiani M, Lettieri T, Blaha L, Jarosova B, Voorspoels S, Servaes K, Haglund P, Fick J, Lindberg RH, Schwesig D, Gawlik BM (2013) EU-wide monitoring survey on emerging polar organic contaminants in wastewater treatment plant effluents. Water Res 47:6475–6487

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrer I, Zweigenbaum JA, Thurman EM (2013) Analytical methodologies for the detection of sucralose in water. Anal Chem 85:9581–9587

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Perkola N, Sainio P (2014) Quantification of four artificial sweeteners in Finnish surface waters with isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Environ Pollut 184:391–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu M, Qian Y, Boyd JM, Hrudey SE, Le XC, Li X-F (2014) Direct large volume injection ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry determination of artificial sweeteners sucralose and acesulfame in well water. J Chromatogr A 1359:156–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zubarev RA, Makarov A (2013) Orbitrap mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 85:5288–5296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fedorova G, Randak T, Lindberg RH, Grabic R (2013) Comparison of the quantitative performance of a Q-Exactive high-resolution mass spectrometer with that of a triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer for the analysis of illicit drugs in wastewater. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 27:1751–1762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hernández F, Sancho JV, Ibáñez M, Abad E, Portolés T, Mattioli L (2012) Current use of high-resolution mass spectrometry in the environmental sciences. Anal Bioanal Chem 403:1251–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Krauss M, Singer H, Hollender J (2010) LC-high resolution MS in environmental analysis: from target screening to the identification of unknowns. Anal Bioanal Chem 397:943–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramirez CE, Wang C, Gardinali PR (2014) Fully automated trace level determination of parent and alkylated PAHs in environmental waters by online SPE-LC-APPI-MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:329–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia-Ac A, Segura PA, Viglino L, Fürtös A, Gagnon C, Prévost M, Sauvé S (2009) On-line solid-phase extraction of large-volume injections coupled to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the quantitation and confirmation of 14 selected trace organic contaminants in drinking and surface water. J Chromatogr A 1216:8518–8527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khan GA, Lindberg R, Grabic R, Fick J (2012) The development and application of a system for simultaneously determining anti-infectives and nasal decongestants using on-line solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 66:24–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. USEPA (2010) CFR 40 title 40 part 163 Appendix B: Definition and procedure for the determination of the method detection limit. 353–356

  27. Koopman B, Heaney J, Rembold M, Indeglia P, Kini G (2006) Ocean outfall study. Final Report, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, Florida

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors want to gratefully acknowledge Dr. Ken Banks and Dr. Nancy Craig from Broward County Natural Resources Planning and Management Division, Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department (EPGMD-NRPMD), for providing the logistic support needed for sample collection. We also acknowledge the support from the Thermo Scientific Corporation in the development of this work. This is contribution number 715 from the Southeast Environmental Research Center at Florida International University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cesar E. Ramirez.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 969 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Batchu, S.R., Ramirez, C.E. & Gardinali, P.R. Rapid ultra-trace analysis of sucralose in multiple-origin aqueous samples by online solid-phase extraction coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 407, 3717–3725 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8593-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-015-8593-6

Keywords

Navigation