Abstract
Rationale
Post-error slowing has long been considered a sign of healthy error detection and an important component of cognitive function. However, the neuropharmacological processes underlying post-error slowing are poorly understood.
Objectives
This study investigated the effect of the dopamine agonist d-amphetamine on post-error slowing and secondarily, the potential mediator of drug-induced euphoria and potential moderators of personality and baseline task performance.
Methods
Healthy male and female participants (N = 110) completed four study sessions, at which d-amphetamine (placebo 5, 10, 20 mg) was administered under double-blind, counter-balanced conditions. At each session, participants completed subjective drug effect assessments and a working memory task (N-back) to measure post-error slowing. They completed the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) during screening.
Results
Amphetamine (20 mg) reduced post-error slowing, consistent with a dampened behavioral reactivity to errors. This was not related to drug-induced euphoria. Although higher scores on MPQ constraint were related to less post-error slowing under placebo conditions, neither personality nor baseline cognitive performance moderated the effects of amphetamine on post-error slowing.
Conclusions
The finding that amphetamine reduced post-error slowing supports the idea that dopamine plays a role in error stimulus processing. The finding is discussed in relation to an existing literature on the mechanisms and function of behavioral and electrophysiological indices of error sensitivity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edn, text revision. American Psychiatric Association
Bush G, Luu P, Posner MI (2000) Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 4:215–222. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01483-2
Callicott JH, Mattay VS, Bertolino A, Finn K, Coppola R, Frank JA, Goldberg TE, Weinberger DR (1999) Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI. Cerebr Cortex 9:20–26. doi:10.1093/cercor/9.1.20
Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD (1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280:747–749. doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.747
Castellar EN, Kühn S, Fias W, Notebaert W (2010) Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 10:270–278. doi:10.3758/cabn.10.2.270
Chevrier A, Schachar RJ (2010) Error detection in the stop signal task. NeuroImage 53:664–673. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.056
de Bruijn ERA, Hulstijn W, Verkes RJ, Ruigt GSF, Sabbe BGC (2004) Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 177:151–160. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-1915-6
de Wit H, Engasser JL, Richards JB (2002) Acute administration of d-amphetamine decreases impulsivity in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology 27:813–825. doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(02)00343-3
Dehaene S, Posner MI, Tucker DM (1994) Localization of a neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 5:303–305. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00630.x
Delaney HD, Maxwell SE (1981) On using analysis of covariance in repeated measures designs. Multivar Behav Res 16:105–123
Depue RA, Luciana M, Arbisi P, Collins P et al (1994) Dopamine and the structure of personality: relation of agonist-induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. J Pers Soc Psychol 67:485–498. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.485
Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Hoormann J, Blanke L (1991) Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 78:447–455. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(91)90062-9
Gehring WJ, Goss B, Coles MG, Meyer DE et al (1993) A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychol Sci 4:385–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00586.x
Hajcak G, McDonald N, Simons RF (2004) Error-related psychophysiology and negative affect. Brain Cogn 56:189–197. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2003.11.001
Holroyd CB, Coles MGH (2002) The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 109:679–709. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679
Holroyd CB, Yeung N, Coles MGH, Cohen JD (2005) A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. J Exp Psychol Gen 134:163–191. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.163
Johanson CE, Uhlenhuth EH (1980) Drug preference and mood in humans: d-amphetamine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 71:275–279. doi:10.1007/bf00433062
Jonkman LM, van Melis JJM, Kemner C, Markus CR (2007) Methylphenidate improves deficient error evaluation in children with ADHD: an event-related brain potential study. Biol Psychol 76:217–229. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.004
Laming D (1979) Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychol (Amst) 43:199–224. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-x
Luu P, Collins P, Tucker DM (2000) Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring. J Exp Psychol Gen 129:43–60. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.43
Mattay VS, Callicott JH, Bertolino A, Heaton I, Frank JA, Coppola R, Berman KF, Goldberg TE, Weinberger DR (2000) Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation. NeuroImage 12:268–275. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0610
Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Egan MF, Kolachana B, Callicott JH, Weinberger DR (2003) Catechol O-methyltransferase val 158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:6186–6191. doi:10.1073/pnas.0931309100
Notebaert W, Houtman F, Van Opstal F, Gevers W, Fias W, Verguts T (2009) Post-error slowing: an orienting account. Cognition 111:275–279. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.002
Pailing PE, Segalowitz SJ, Dywan J, Davies PL (2002) Error negativity and response control. Psychophysiology 39:198–206. doi:10.1017/s0048577202010247
Patrick CJ, Curtin JJ, Tellegen A (2002) Development and validation of a brief form of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire. Psychol Assess 14:150–163. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.2.150
Paus T (2001) Primate anterior cingulate cortex: where motor control, drive and cognition interface. Nat Rev Neurosci 2:417–424. doi:10.1038/35077500
Rabbitt PM (1966) Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. J Exp Psychol 71:264–272. doi:10.1037/h0022853
Ridderinkhof KR, Ullsperger M, Crone EA, Nieuwenhuis S (2004) The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 306:443–447. doi:10.1126/science.1100301
Ruchsow M, Br H, Wiesend C, Grön G, Spitzer M, Kiefer M (2004) The effect of erroneous responses on response monitoring in patients with major depressive disorder: a study with event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 41:833–840. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00237.x
Schachar RJ, Chen S, Logan GD, Ornstein TJ, Crosbie J, Ickowicz A, Pakulak A (2004) Evidence for an error monitoring deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. J Abnorm Child Psychol 32:285–293. doi:10.1023/B:JACP.0000026142.11217.f2
Schultz W (2002) Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 36:241–263
Sergeant JA, Van der Meere J (1988) What happens after a hyperactive child commits an error? Psychiatry Res 24:157–164. doi:10.1016/0165-1781(88)90058-3
Smallwood J, Fitzgerald A, Miles LK, Phillips LH (2009) Shifting moods, wandering minds: negative moods lead the mind to wander. Emotion 9:271–276. doi:10.1037/a0014855
Stemmer B, Segalowitz SJ, Dywan J, Panisset M, Melmed C (2007) The error negativity in nonmedicated and medicated patients with Parkinson's disease. Clin Neurophysiol 118:1223–1229. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.02.019
Thakkar KN, Polli FE, Joseph RM, Tuch DS, Hadjikhani N, Barton JJS, Manoach DS (2008) Response monitoring, repetitive behaviour and anterior cingulate abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Brain 131:2464–2478. doi:10.1093/brain/awn099
Tops M, Boksem MAS (2010) Absorbed in the task: personality measures predict engagement during task performance as tracked by error negativity and asymmetrical frontal activity. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 10:441–453. doi:10.3758/cabn.10.4.441
Vlamings PHJM, Jonkman LM, Hoeksma MR, van Engeland H, Kemner C (2008) Reduced error monitoring in children with autism spectrum disorder: an ERP study. Eur J Neurosci 28:399–406. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06336.x
Wiersema J, Van Der Meere J, Roeyers H (2005) ERP correlates of impaired error monitoring in children with ADHD. J Neural Transm 112:1417–1430. doi:10.1007/s00702-005-0276-6
Yeung N, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD (2004) The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychol Rev 111:931–959. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.4.931
Zirnheld PJ, Carroll CA, Kieffaber PD, O'Donnell BF, Shekhar A, Hetrick WP (2004) Haloperidol impairs learning and error-related negativity in humans. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1098–1112. doi:10.1162/0898929041502779
Acknowledgments
A. Yang was supported by NIDA DA021336 (PI: A.A. Palmer), H. de Wit by DA02812 (PI: H. de Wit), and M. Wardle by T32 DA007255. The authors report no biomedical interests or potential conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wardle, M.C., Yang, A. & de Wit, H. Effect of d-amphetamine on post-error slowing in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology 220, 109–115 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2462-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-011-2462-6