Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Droplet transfer model for laser-enhanced GMAW

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laser-enhanced gas metal arc welding (GMAW) is a recent modification of conventional GMAW. It applies a low power laser to the droplet to obtain an auxiliary detaching force to help the detachment and achieve controlled metal transfer. As a primary parameter that affects the process and weld quality, the size of the droplet needs to be monitored and controlled. However, its direct measurement requires a high-speed camera and is not preferred in a manufacturing site because of its high cost and complicated system structure. Soft-sensing method was thus proposed as an alternative to obtain it in real time. Laser power intensity, wire feed speed and welding voltage were identified as the major parameters that determine the droplet size and were thus selected as the auxiliary variables to estimate the primary parameters: size and transfer rate of the droplet. Least squares (LS) regression equation, back-propagation neural network (BPNN), particle swarm optimization-based back-propagation neural network, and three swarm cooperative particle swarm optimization-based back-propagation neural network (TSCPSO-BPNN) models were established from the collected data. Simulation results were analyzed and compared among these models. It was found that the selected auxiliary variables were closely related to the primary variables. Droplet size and transfer rate estimates made based on the TSCPSO-BPNN model are similar to those based on LS regression equation. After dimension reduction, the LS equation can be simpler than TSCPSO-BPNN model while the accuracy is sufficient and meets the requirement for future control. The estimation by LS method could thus be utilized in the control of the laser-enhanced GMAW.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sadler H (1999) A look at the fundamentals of gas arc metal welding. Weld J 78(5):45–50

    Google Scholar 

  2. Thomsen JS (2006) Control of pulsed gas metal arc welding. Int J Model Identif Control 1(2):115–125

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Brien RL (1991) Welding handbook vol. 2: welding processes, 8th edn. American Welding Society, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang Y, Zhang YM (2010) Laser enhanced GMAW. Weld J 89(9):181s–188s

    Google Scholar 

  5. McAvoy TJ (1992) Contemplative stance for chemical process control. Automatica 28(2):441–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu JJ, Zhou CH (1996) Soft-sensing techniques in process control. Control Theory Appl 13(2):137–144

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Richalet J, Rault A, Testud JL, Papon J (1978) Model predictive heuristic control: applications to industrial processes. Automatica 14(5):413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Piotrowski K, Piotrowskib J, Schlesingerb J (2003) Modelling of complex liquid–vapour equilibria in the urea synthesis process with the use of artificial neural network. Chem Eng Process 42(4):285–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou Y, Hahn J, Mannan MS (2003) Fault detection and classification in chemical processes based on neural networks with feature extraction. ISA Trans 42(4):651–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liau LCK, Yang TCK, Tsai MT (2004) Expert system of a crude oil distillation unit for process optimization using neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 26(2):247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu CH, Tsai CC (2007) Generalized predictive control using recurrent fuzzy neural networks for industrial processes. J Process Control 17(1):83–92

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Björck Å (1996) Numerical methods for least squares problems. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (1986) Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moody J, Darken CJ (1988) “Learning with localized receptive fields,” Proceedings of the 1988 Connectionist Models Summer School

  15. Moody J, Darken CJ (1989) Fast learning in network of locally-tuned processing units. Neural Comput 1:281–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hagan MT, Demuth HB, Beale MH (2002) Neural network design. PWS, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  17. Colorni A, Dorigo M, and Maniezzo V, (1991) “Distributed optimization by ant colonies,” Proc. of First European Conference on Artificial Life, pp 134-142. Paris, France

  18. Dorigo M, Stützle T (2004) Ant colony optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CDJ, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Millonas MM (1994) “Swarm, phase transition, and collective intelligence,” Artificial life III. Addison Wesley, MA

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) “A new optimizer using particle swarm theory,” Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on micro machine and human science (Nagoya, Japan). IEEE, Piscataway, pp 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) “Particle swarm optimization”, Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, IV. IEEE, Piscataway, pp 1942–1948

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kim TH, Maruta I, Sugie T (2008) Robust PID controller tuning based on the constrained particle swarm optimization. Automatica 44(4):1104–1110

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Goh CK, Tan KC, Liu DS, Chiam SC (2010) A competitive and cooperative co-evolutionary approach to multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm design. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):42–54

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Sabat SL, Ali L, Udgata SK (2011) Integrated learning particle swarm optimizer for global optimization, Appl Soft Comput 11(1):574–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tandon V, (2001) “Closing the Gap between CAD/CAM and Optimized CNC End Milling,” Master’s thesis, Purdue School of Engineering and Technology, Indiana University Purdue University

  27. Wang SH, Feng NQ, Li AG (2003) A BP networks learning algorithm based on PSO. Comput Appl Softw 20(8):74–76

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chau KW (2007) Application of a PSO-based neural network in analysis of outcomes of construction claims. Autom Constr 16(5):642–646

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu ZQ, Gu XS, Chen GC (2006) Three swarms cooperative particle swarm optimization. J East China Univ Sci Technol 32(7):754–757

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang XW, Gu XS, Liu ZQ, Shang YQ (2009) Soft sensing model of C3 concentration of FCCU based on PSO-BP Neural Network. J Syst Simul 21(4):973–976

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Information Science & Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China

    XueWu Wang

  2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA

    XueWu Wang, Yi Huang & YuMing Zhang

Authors
  1. XueWu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. YuMing Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to YuMing Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, X., Huang, Y. & Zhang, Y. Droplet transfer model for laser-enhanced GMAW. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 207–217 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4014-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4014-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation