Abstract
With the increasing demand for low-volume and customer-made products, incremental sheet metal forming (ISMF), a dieless sheet metal forming process, has become one of the leading R&D topics in the industry today. We developed a new ISMF system based on incremental punching: a sheet metal is formed into the final shape by a series of small incremental punches. This paper is the first of the two papers and is focused on the theory. The theoretical model consists of two parts. First, a mechanics model is developed to predict the final shape based on the minimum energy principle. In this model, an initial geometric surface is formed by the punch positions; then based on the fact that the energy will drive the sheet metal to attain its lowest energy position, the geometry of the final shape is derived. Then, another model is developed to predict the strain and stress distributions of the part using the inverse finite element modeling (FEM), also called the one-step FEM. Several numerical examples are provided. In the second part of the two papers, the design and the building of an incremental punching machine, as well as experiment results are given.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Marciniak Z, Duncan JL, Hu SJ (2002) Mechanics of sheet metal forming. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford
Geiger M, Merklein M, Pitz M (2004) Laser and forming technology—an idea and the way of implementation. J Mater Process Technol 151:3–11. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.004
Kim H, Nargundkar N, Altan T (2007) Prediction of bend allowance and springback in air bending. J Manuf Sci Eng 129:342–351. doi:10.1115/1.2673527
Cai ZY, Li MZ, Chen XD (2006) Digitized die forming system for sheet metal and springback minimizing technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:1089–1096. doi:10.1007/s00170-004-2459-y
Wang T, Platts MJ, Levers A (2006) A process model for shot peen forming. J Mater Process Technol 172:159–162. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.006
Jeswiet J, Geiger M, Engel U, Kleiner M, Schikorra M, Duflou J, Neugebauer R, Bariani P, Bruschi S (2008) Metal forming progress since 2000. CIRP Manuf Sci Technol 1:2–17. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2008.06.005
Allwood JM, Utsunomiya H (2006) A survey of flexible forming processes in Japan. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46:1939–1960. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.034
Amino H, Ro G (2001) Dieless NC forming. J Jpn Soc Technol Plast 42:69–73
Schafer T, Schraft RD (2005) Incremental sheet metal forming by industrial robots. Rapid Prototyping J 11:278–286. doi:10.1108/13552540510623585
Levers A, Prior A (1998) Finite element analysis of shot peening. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:304–308. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00188-5
Hong T, Ooi JY, Shaw B (2008) A numerical simulation to relate the shot peening parameters to the induced residual stresses. Eng Fail Anal 15:1097–1110. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.11.017
Strano M, Ruggiero M, Carrino L (2005) Technological representation of forming limits for negative incremental forming of thin aluminum sheets. J Manuf Process 7:122–129. doi:10.1016/S1526-6125(05)70089-X
Yamashita M, Gotoha M, Atsumia S (2008) Numerical simulation of incremental forming of sheet metal. J Mater Process Technol 199:163–172. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.037
Pohlak M, Kuttner R, Majak J, Karjust K, Sutt A (2004) Simulation of incremental forming of sheet metal products. 4th Int DAAAM Conf, Tallinn, Estonia
Callegari M, Amodio D, Ceretti E, Giardini C (2007) Sheet incremental forming: advantages of pobotised cells vs. CNC machines. Industrial Robotics: Programming, Simulation and Application, ARS, Vienna, pp 493–514
Iseki H (2001) An approximate deformation analysis and FEM analysis for the incremental bulging of sheet metal using a spherical roller. J Mater Process Technol 111:150–154. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00500-3
Silva MB, Skjoedt M, Martins PAF, Bay N (2008) Revisiting the fundamentals of single point incremental forming by means of membrane analysis. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 48:73–83. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.07.004
Martins P, Bay N, Skjoedt M, Silva M (2008) Theory of single point incremental forming. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 57:247–252
Raithatha A, Jackson K, Duncan S, Allwood J (2006) New method for modeling plastic deformation in incremental sheet forming. Proc IEEE Int Conf Cntrl App, Munich, Germany
Tang BT, Zhao Z, Lu XY, Wang ZQ, Zhao XW, Chen SY (2007) Fast thickness prediction and blank design in sheet metal forming based on an enhanced inverse analysis method. Int J Mech Sci 49:1018–1028. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2007.02.003
Hu S, Li YF, Ju T, Zhu X (2001) Modifying the shape of NURBS surfaces with geometric constraints. Comput Aided Design 33:903–912. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.01.007
Batoz JL, Guo YQ, Mercier F (1998) The inverse approach with simple triangular shell elements for large strain prediction of sheet metal forming parts. J Eng Comp 15(7):864–892. doi:10.1108/02644409810236894
Lee CH, Huh H (1998) Blank design and strain estimates for sheet metal forming processes by a finite element inverse approach with initial guess of linear deformation. J Mater Process Technol 82(1–3):145–155. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00034-X
Huang Y, Chen YP, Du R (2006) A new approach to solve key issues in multi-step inverse finite element method in sheet metal stamping. Int J Mech Sci 48(6):591–600. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.01.007
Lan J, Dong XH, Li ZG (2005) Inverse finite element approach and its application in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 170(3):624–631. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.043
Naceur H, Delamiere A, Batoz JL (2004) Some improvements on the optimum process design in deep drawing using the inverse approach. J Mater Process Technol 146(2):250–262. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.015
Becker AA (2004) An introduction to finite element method. Professional Engineering Publishing, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luo, Y., He, K. & Du, R. A new sheet metal forming system based on the incremental punching, part 1: modeling and simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51, 481–491 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2634-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2634-2