Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) was developed as a new precision finishing process for complicated geometries using smart magnetorheological polishing fluid. This process introduces determinism and in-process controllability of rheological behaviour of abrasive laden medium used for finishing intricate shapes. Magnetorheological polishing (MRP) fluid is comprised of carbonyl iron powder and silicon carbide abrasives dispersed in a viscoplastic base of grease and mineral oil and exhibits change in rheological behaviour in presence of external magnetic field. This smart behaviour of MRP fluid is utilized to precisely control finishing forces. The process performance in terms of surface roughness reduction depends on process variables like hydraulic extrusion pressure, magnetic flux density in the finishing zone, number of finishing cycles, and composition of MRP fluid. In the present work, experiments were conducted on a hydraulically powered MRAFF experimental setup to study the effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on the change in surface roughness of stainless steel grounded workpieces. A new observation of “illusive polishing” action with the initial increase in number of finishing cycles is reported. The actual finishing action is possible only after removal of initial loosely held material remaining after grinding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams RE, Rajurkar KP, Rhodes LJ (1989) Performance characteristics of abrasive flow machining. SME Technical Paper FC89-806:695–706

  2. Fox M, Agrawal K, Shinmura T, Komanduri R (1994) Magnetic abrasive finishing of rollers. CIRP Ann 43/1

  3. Umehera N (1994) Magnetic fluid grinding - a new technique for finishing advanced ceramics. CIRP Ann 43/1:185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kordonski WI, Jacobs SD (1996) Magnetorheological finishing. Int J Mod Phys B 10/23,24:2837–2848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kordonski W, Golini D (1999) Progress update in magnetorheological finishing. Int J Mod Phys B 13/14,15,16:2205–2212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jha Sunil, Jain VK (2004) Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44/10:1019–1029

    Google Scholar 

  7. Furst EM, Gast AP (2000) Micromechanics of magnetorheological suspensions. Phys Rev E 61/6:6732–6739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ginder JM, Davis LC (1994) Shear stresses in magnetorheological fluids: role of magnetic saturation. Appl Phys Lett 65/26:3410–3412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fang L, Zhou QD, Li YJ (1991) An explanation of the relation between wear and material hardness in three-body abrasion. Wear 151:313–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank BASF Germany for arranging carbonyl iron powders of different grades for our research work. We acknowledge the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, India for their financial support for project no. 5411/NS/02/EMR II entitled “Magnetorheological Abrasive Flow Finishing (MRAFF) Process”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. K. Jain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jha, S., Jain, V.K. & Komanduri, R. Effect of extrusion pressure and number of finishing cycles on surface roughness in magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33, 725–729 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0502-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0502-x

Keywords

Navigation